Bad and Negative SEO to your main website

[Unreliable Witness]

your strategy seems logic. i will give it a try. thanks

You could also try a news release that links back to your site using URLs or brand in order to try to rebalance any remaining mass of spam that you haven't picked up by other means. It isn't perfect, but might just help.

 

[christianizer]

Moving your site and redirecting would be a good option.

 

[mbreezy]

If Google was that smarter we wouldn't have been discussing negative SEO at all.

Agreed. That is why I first recommended to disavow links. Nonetheless, Penguin 4.0 is smarter than previous versions.

 

[sachin_panwar1996]

this is funny stuff. the better Google do their anti-negative seo algorhitm, the worse their blackhat seo algorhitm will be. What i mean is that, the more they ignore these shitty links (link is a link btw), the equally more bad links a beginner can do without getting penalty.
it's a lose:lose for them.
However old domains seem to not give a f about negative seo. I didnt test that i just heard and it makes sense.

exactly my thought.. its a kind of double-edged sword for google... if they start ignoring gsa , automated kind of links... people ll start throwing the shit (links) on the wall n ll hope the good ones will stick n rest ll be ignored.........

 

[aidenhera]

exactly my thought.. its a kind of double-edged sword for google... if they start ignoring gsa , automated kind of links... people ll start throwing the shit (links) on the wall n ll hope the good ones will stick n rest ll be ignored.........

its not only about gsa. its about everything, raising a limit of allowed duplicate content, spin content, not-enough diversified anchors,etc before they land a penalty on someone.

also, i think currently theres no way to differentiate negative seo if it was done properly for google. The only way to survive, is to have many good backlinks. Older domains survive negative seo, because they have 99k of natural backlinks, so it doesnt matter if u shoot 5k shitlinks at them hoping they will get penalty. You might start from expired domains to protect yourself, as they have already big backlink profile, but i prefer to make it on my own.

they might do eventually somethnig in direction of indexing these shitlinks, which becomes harder and harder.

 

[Nestory]

i did the disavow link, but no results. i am thinking to do this:

(Website with BAD ANCHORS) 301 => (NEW WEBSITE) 301 => (NEW WEBSITE)

or

(Website with BAD ANCHORS) article with d0f0ll0w link to => (NEW WEBSITE)

 

[Daniel from Linxact]

this is funny stuff. the better Google do their anti-negative seo algorhitm, the worse their blackhat seo algorhitm will be. What i mean is that, the more they ignore these shitty links (link is a link btw), the equally more bad links a beginner can do without getting penalty.
it's a lose:lose for them.
However old domains seem to not give a f about negative seo. I didnt test that i just heard and it makes sense.

I disagree.

 

[Unreliable Witness]

i did the disavow link, but no results. i am thinking to do this:

(Website with BAD ANCHORS) 301 => (NEW WEBSITE) 301 => (NEW WEBSITE)

or

(Website with BAD ANCHORS) article with d0f0ll0w link to => (NEW WEBSITE)

If you disavow, it can take weeks for Google to take notice of it. You have force it to crawl all disavowed links (most of which it doesn't want to do because the quality of the page is low and is therefore a waste of resources to crawl). Then you have to wait for it to process the pages.

If you 301 a "penalised" site to a new one, you're transferring the anchor text profile to the new one as well. Doing this won't solve your problem.

Linking to your new site is much better.