PBN blogposts vs. SAPE links

YT vid is a parasite, I wouldn't bother with velocity there.

For me, web 2.0s (non expired with filtered spam or cheap PBN links on tier 2) don't do crap either.

For a new site be careful though. Let it rest for a month or so before you start building links. Unless it's a churn and burn stuff. Then fire away.
 
What do you mean YT vid is parasite?

I meant building PBN for a money YT vid, what is your feedback for that?

That new algo kicked so hard web 2 I'm finding but who knows
 
That its actual location is on the strong domain, which won't get penalized easily. Which is Youtube.com. I know what you meant and my answer remains the same.
 
What do you mean you won't bother with velocity? Can you share your exp with PBN only and YT?

you would wait a month then build links to YT or were you referring to a regular website?
 
Jesus mate, I am drunk, but I still don't think I am not making myself clear.

Don't bother with velocity = BLAST THE FUCK AWAY ALL GUNS BLAZING MURICAAAAARGH!

Clearer now?

I was referring to regular website with waiting. With vids - see my answer 2 lines above.

EDIT: Yeh and I hate that breed of dogs you got on the profile pics. Sorry, had to say that, whisky talking. #catperson
 
Seems not too many of the guys that gave a big NO to SAPE ever found high quality sape links :D For more than 1 year I used SAPE links on 3 different websites all with awesome results. Just last months I stopped because of the G algo update, it seem not to work any longer. However, will use them again once we know more about the G update!

RuthSam bought from me for over a year.

I can verify that they've worked pretty well over the past (even through a web 2.0 like I did for RuthSAm).

However, from what I'm seeing in my case study here here www.blackhatworld.com/seo/case-study-gsa-directly-on-one-page-affiliate-offers.852187/, Russian language homepage footer/sidebar links don't work nearly as well as they used to.

I'm still ranking higher than where I was before adding the SAPE links, but all three sites I used SAPE on have dropped to their pre-SAPE levels.

I'm going to switch the links off using only romanic script sites and see what happens.
 
Not sure if it was in this thread or a different one, but I was using just non-russian sites. All were either English, Italian, etc. And the results were just the same. Basically none. Feel free to give it a shot. I am curious myself. But for me, the Sape is basically dead. HOWEVER! What might be profitable is to use sape in order to rank in Bing and Yahoo. The traffic there is getting better and better and a few cheap sape links may do magic. Just a food for thought.
 
I guess not many PBN and YT much

YT is taking a longggg time to index the back links wow!!!
 
Not sure if it was in this thread or a different one, but I was using just non-russian sites. All were either English, Italian, etc. And the results were just the same. Basically none. Feel free to give it a shot. I am curious myself. But for me, the Sape is basically dead. HOWEVER! What might be profitable is to use sape in order to rank in Bing and Yahoo. The traffic there is getting better and better and a few cheap sape links may do magic. Just a food for thought.

I don't think they've stopped working entirely seeing as how the sites I was testing settled higher than before I added them, but I can almost 100% say for sure that noncontextual links have been devalued again.
 
Back
Top