PBN blogposts vs. SAPE links

[bignose]

Of course PBN. Your sites are your assets forever. But bought links...

 

[Splorks]

PBN by far. I've used SAPE links and don't believe they are nearly as powerful. SAPE links are cheaper, but power per dollar is not worth it.

 

[Serik]

the grid more efficient, but it is very labor-intensive and too expensive in terms of money, so it's up to you to decide

 

[Web Nike]

First you done OnPage with focusing on main factors, then start getting pbn links. Believe me you will boost.

 

[jacker818]

PBN all day, sape is to risky IMO..

 

[tjoans]

Would it be safe to say that on the blackhat/whitehat spectrum:

Sape = more blackhat

PBN = more whitehat

Although they're both considered blackhat in general?

 

[kudanil]

I choose PBN like other said

 

[andrew1978]

i tried SAPE on 3 separate occasions

nothing EVER happened

 

[DigitalCon]

Would it be safe to say that on the blackhat/whitehat spectrum:

Sape = more blackhat

PBN = more whitehat

Although they're both considered blackhat in general?

Sape= Blackhat
PBN= Blackhat

In general:

Every link you make for your site to manipulate its rankings = Blackhat

 

[Deleted member 755860]

PBN only and forget other link types? The new G algo is throwing me off

 

[bekemew]

PBNs of course. PBNs are extremely powerful in ranking any keyword While SAPE can give you good results but it's usually short lived

 

[Purush]

pbn is better option here

 

[RuthSam]

Seems not too many of the guys that gave a big NO to SAPE ever found high quality sape links For more than 1 year I used SAPE links on 3 different websites all with awesome results. Just last months I stopped because of the G algo update, it seem not to work any longer. However, will use them again once we know more about the G update!

 

[whiteblackseo]

SAPE can be VERY useful if you find the right links instead of the spammy links that are usually there. But overall I would pick a PBN mainly because of how easier it is.

 

[macdonjo3]

Personally, I usually combine the efforts of the 2. There's no need for comparison.

 

[Deleted member 755860]

What do you think about PBN as the only back links you need?

 

[Nargil]

What do you think about PBN as the only back links you need?

Basically, it's true. Can you rank with PBN links only? Yes. However, most of the people like to diversify the links especially for the anchors. That way you can use partial/exact anchors on PBNs and brand/URL on the diversity low linkjuice links. Entire strategy is up to you.

 

[soa0611]

Basically, it's true. Can you rank with PBN links only? Yes. However, most of the people like to diversify the links especially for the anchors. That way you can use partial/exact anchors on PBNs and brand/URL on the diversity low linkjuice links. Entire strategy is up to you.

thats what i do now (did, now waiting out the update)
PBN exact/lsi + Web2.0s for naked/brand, thats all
and a bit of FB shares and some tweets

 

[Nargil]

Don't overdo it with the exacts and partials. Unless it's a churn and burn project.

 

[Deleted member 755860]

Don't you love the waiting aspect?

How quickly do you build PBN for a new site or YT vid?

I'm trying to determine if using PBN only links are a good idea for YT vids.

The recent update has made me change my strategy.

Web 2 does f all it seems so far but who knows