So with 10 transistors you'll have... giving > receiving > giving > receiving > giving .... > money site ?
Does this only work with domains or can you use web 2.0's like blogger, tumblr?
I have a strong feeling this is all bullshit but fuck it
No, that's wrong. You would have 10 pairs of 2 websites each, one giving and one receiving. All link to the website that you want to rank, site 3.
You can't use web 2.0's, I will explain later if someone asks again why exactly you can't use that.
maybe we could try this expired domains instead of new sites
That's not good as well, you see, expired domains rank higher because of the trust they've accumulated over time with traffic and because they might have links already. You need two websites to constantly race eachother to get more Google trust compensation.
You said the updates for yandex will most likely happen with google.
Does this mean you haven't actually tested it with google.
I did, but I never focused on Google. I indirectly tested it by seeing that I had more traffic from Google, which would it mean that it did rank on Google. On a pretty competitive niche.
Can u show the structure of the linking sites? And how this get boosted?
Linking sites? I don't understand which you mean. There are a lot of sites that link there in different ways. I've uploaded a photo.
What technology, this will have no value as long as you cannot show some evidences
Why don't you just try it, it will cost you pennies. Make a experiment or something like that, 2 sites, one gets 2 normal links that have no backlinks to them and the other gets 1 transistor link.
Been following the thread since you started it OP and I think all these are bullshit
If not, show us evidence.
@mickyfu Bless this new guy using your heavenly words, who knows he might stop talking those transistor stuff
Same as above.
People, wether you believe or not OP, he's sharing information that need to be though on. Everything he says makes sense and would explain a lot of things in the actual algorithm.
I still have one remaining question left unanswered : How do you link site 2 to site 3 (receiving to money site). Is it from homepage or subpages ?
Once i get back from holidays, I'll conduct testing.
Thanks, you link from the homepage only, because that's where site1 links to.
If you think it's bullshit, then leave the thread and don't follow it, no one is forcing you.
Thank you.
If I start a thread claiming if you "build exactly 57 links from one Tumblr page and no other links you'll shoot straight to rank 1!" all I should have is people getting on my dick for how great I am?
People are right to hold this up to scrutiny and while OP is under no obligation to show a domain a domain the only thing this really has going for it is wishful thinking.
Well this is my biggest issue with the concept.
OP mentioned you can't build other links because that would tell the search engine you no longer need the compensation (I'd quote it but I'm on a tiny laptop - scroll up though it's there). But I can't remember the last time I saw a keyword in a medium niche with one link from another new domain.
OP said the example site he posted there used to rank on Google.ru but only fell because it was outdated. I can accept it would fall off the page but I've had sites with no updates for longer than these two and if they fall they might slip a few positions or even pages but fall out of the serps entirely?
If anyone has an SEMrush guru account they scrape Google.ru if you stick the domains in there you won't see historic ranking data for them.
You can build links to site3, but if you build the links to transistors it will make them unstable. You then will get a chance that they will both lose all of their compensation from Google.
Also I never said that you can only rank with transistors, I want to tell you all that it's just more cost effective. And safer since you use less links.
the no links only applies to site 1 and site 2 so you receive the compensation? Or does it carry over to site 3
Yes, you can build links to site3.
Your points about receiving and giving structures are redundant, as every sub page of a site also links to many other pages on the same site, making them also a giving structure not a receiving structure.
That's the whole point, the first Google update, Google doesn't see that, because the the site2 that site1 linked to didn't give away all of it's trust and didn't get bonus trust. The second update it does and ranks higher than site1. Which then third update causes site1 to get also a compensation and rank higher than site2, which goes in a loop.
Nice OP.
I need a confirmation about this thread.
So, if we would like to test your technic, we need :
- fresh domain (site 1),
- fresh domain (site 2).
Content orientation :
Site 1 : Explaination on a single keyword niche
Site 2 : Commercial content on the same keyword niche (site 1).
Site 1 :
- Play with links (wikipedia & co.) ,
- No links on home page to articles ("stati" as you explained it),
- 8 articles with link to the home page,
- 1 link on the home page to the site 2 (optimized anchor).
Site 2 :
- Commercial content on home page,
- No link to the money site (for the moment),
- Links to the subpages autorized.
After many crawls by Google, your sites (1 & 2) are powerfull and you can link to your money site.
Is it right ?
Thanks for your reply OP
Yes that's right, however you do need a link to articles. An irellevant link to your articles page where all articles are listed and there links to articles. Each article then links to the homepage at it's title or in the tirst sentence with anchor to homepage of the keyword. You need as many articles that are related as the amount of keywords you're going to use.
"the algorithm of Google has no differences from the algorithm of Yandex for the reference ranking." False
"You need a mix of informational and commercial sites otherwise you will be penalized." False
Don't take my words in exact meaning. Let's say Vasya and Petya are both different boys, but both have a penis, why are you saying that one of them is a girl then without inspecting what's under the trousers? That's your answer on your first statement.
If two Mexicans are both selling a cactus, then one Mexican can't recommend buying a cactus from the other Mexican, can he? Otherwise why would he be standing there? Wasting martketplace square metres? He will get penalized. Of course if both of the websites have a huge spectrum of different keywords, then it won't make a difference. However the sites I am talking about using in a transistor need to be point-on-point exact in their keywords. Then it is a big difference and they will gey penalized. That's why one has to be commercial and the other informational.
I absolutely agree successful SEO is all about testing. And if someone had posted this as an interesting theory on how Google would compensate sites linking out and the balance between trust and relevance I'd be down. But it's not theory crafting it's making some pretty big claims. Ok the guy posting "this is bullshit" wasn't adding value to the conversation but if I start telling people to buy domains and post photos of my junk for easy rankings you're going to leave me to it? If we didn't question information shared then this forum wouldn't be worth shit. If OP really is a big player in Russian SEO then no doubt skepticism from an SEO forum isn't a surprise.
I don't want to argue. I'm sure we both have better things to do. But it's not wrong to question SEO tactics whether they're charging for them or not.
The example domains you posted. You said one ranked first page for well drilling but SEMrush has nothing for historic rankings on Google.ru. If we assume that's just down to them not crawling .ru properly that still leaves one issue.
I checked the old caches of that site it hasn't changed. If I don't change a site for that long it might not hold a page 1 ranking but it won't fall out of the organic search entirely.
I'd expect a site which was ranking #1 for a competitive keyword to at least be in the top #100 with no changes so something doesn't add up there.
This isn't calling "this is bullshit" this is just a fact. It would not be normal for a site to slip completely out of the results on every page for not being updated.
If we ignore that and assume it's down a weird quirk in abusing this compensation then that still leaves the big important question in my head. The same one I mentioned before.
If this makes a link x10 more powerful. It's still just a link from a brand new domain. Even x10 that's not going to carry a lot of weight. I had a quick poke at the google.ru "make money online" SERPS and I'm yet to see a result which looks like this.
Russian google has problems with geotargeting foreign keywords. Actually Google is horrible in other languages. That's why it doesn't see for which region the website was ranked for. Of course your website stayed there, as long as a website gets traffic, it will keep ranking.
