SEO relevancy amplifiying method [GIVEAWAY]

Status
Not open for further replies.
THUNDERELVI said:
If you think it's bullshit, then leave the thread and don't follow it, no one is forcing you.
Click to expand...

If I start a thread claiming if you "build exactly 57 links from one Tumblr page and no other links you'll shoot straight to rank 1!" all I should have is people getting on my dick for how great I am?

People are right to hold this up to scrutiny and while OP is under no obligation to show a domain a domain the only thing this really has going for it is wishful thinking.

ThePortugueseDude said:
maybe we could try this expired domains instead of new sites
Click to expand...

Well this is my biggest issue with the concept.

OP mentioned you can't build other links because that would tell the search engine you no longer need the compensation (I'd quote it but I'm on a tiny laptop - scroll up though it's there). But I can't remember the last time I saw a keyword in a medium niche with one link from another new domain.

OP said the example site he posted there used to rank on Google.ru but only fell because it was outdated. I can accept it would fall off the page but I've had sites with no updates for longer than these two and if they fall they might slip a few positions or even pages but fall out of the serps entirely?

If anyone has an SEMrush guru account they scrape Google.ru if you stick the domains in there you won't see historic ranking data for them.
 
Advertise on BHW
tar729 said:
Explanation :

*) There are two types of ranking factors that links pass on, trust and semantic power. Trust means that a website has vouched for you, it passes on from any type of link that is ********, it's the basis of algorithms. Semantic means meaning or information. As you've all known already, Semantic power, a word that you don't use on this forum, comes mainly from sources such as Wikipedia, social bookmarks and so on. You can't say it doesn't pass any link juice, because a site with more semantic power will rank higher than a site with less Semantic power assuming everything else is the same.

*) There are three types of structures that we can categorise all websites in : giving, receiving and just a normal website.
The giving structure gives out all of it's semantic power and trust from it's homepage onto it's internal pages. Because the homepage doesn't have any semantic power left, it receives a "compensation" from Search engines, extra trust. So that it can rank for all the keywords that it has in the menu that lead to internal pages, otherwise it would be at the bottom of every SERP with 0 semantic power and 0 trust.
The receiving structure takes in all the semantic power and a bit of trust from it's internal pages, it's loaded with semantic power.

*) Trust and semantic power in the eyes of search engines don't have a big difference, that's why the homepage of a giving structure website will rank approximately the same as the homepage of a receiving structure website. Semantic power can not be given away, it can't be shared, if you give it away it will get multiplied, but it can't be exploited.

*) When the first update happens after both of the sites launch, the website with the giving structure website ( site 2 ) receives semantic power through a link from the website with the receiving( site 1 ) structure. Because the giving structure website( site 2 ) now has compensation trust + semantic power that it received from the receiving structure website site 1 multiplied together, it now ranks higher for it's keyword. Because the giving structure website( site 2 ) now ranks higher through the extra semantic power that it received from the receiving structure website : technically the receiving structure website( site 1 ) has now given/shared away it's semantic power and now receives bonus compensation trust from Google, that's where all the magic amplification happens. The next update the receiving structure website( site 1 ) will rank higher than the giving structure website( site 2 ), Google will once again give bonus trust onto the giving structure website( site 2 ) which will rank higher again than the receiving structure website( site 1 ). And this will go on and on in a continuous update cycle. This update cycle keeps adding bonus trust to both of the websites, to one website per update. This cycle is not lineair and will not continue infinetely, however it does give a huge boost, approximately amplification of 5-10 times. With time the variations will "stabilize".
Click to expand...
Which russian forums has good information about seo and which is best to learn it?
 
coma123 said:
Which russian forums has good information about seo and which is best to learn it?
Click to expand...
on the Russian forums do not share important information. To read them is meaningless. if someone places an important and valuable it is immediately placed in a ban.
all moderators are corrupt. hard totalitarianism.
Russian forums specifically pay trolls. Their goal is to dilute the valuable information nonsense. From this, people are confused in their thoughts and more in need of counseling. Profit.
this Russian world, baby :)
all relevant information in closed groups, Facebook and other
 
Last edited:
the no links only applies to site 1 and site 2 so you receive the compensation? Or does it carry over to site 3
 
florinovic said:
total delirium:eek:
Click to expand...
no. just trolls in the scheme of monetization of the forum. trolls have the highest reputation and most of the money for the consult. Moderators have profit from web services. Their goal is to send to the web services people.
 
dondada7 said:
the no links only applies to site 1 and site 2 so you receive the compensation? Or does it carry over to site 3
Click to expand...
can't answer correctly without a translator. Wait, ask more questions to all will reply
 
Your points about receiving and giving structures are redundant, as every sub page of a site also links to many other pages on the same site, making them also a giving structure not a receiving structure.
 
FutureProofSeo said:
Your points about receiving and giving structures are redundant, as every sub page of a site also links to many other pages on the same site, making them also a giving structure not a receiving structure.
Click to expand...
you are not right. I'll explain later. the essence of the importance of content types and links. what you call redundancy - there is a tuning. It has little impact on the relevance of the keyword.
 
seo83 said:
Did i get this right , op?
To get the extra boost i will need to have the following set up:

PBN2=>PBN1=>Moneysite

PBN2: Internal Links to homepage from subpages, no links from homepage to subpages. Does this mean subpages are not in site navigation, or dou you talk about contextual backlinks?
PBN1: Internal Links to subpages from homepage, no links from subpages to homepage.
Click to expand...

Yes this is exact formula.
Think what you can achive if you have this
PBN4=>PBN3=>PBN2=>PBN1=>Moneysite up to 9 levels.This is the final that Google Algorithm will supports this.
You all can't imagine how powerful SEO is this.
And yes another catch is that I suggest until Google Developers noticed this Article and indexed this to be moved to protected area VIP and so on.This is Gold Mine of Google.
I beg admin and moderators of BHW this Thread to be moved to protected area and reward OP with VIP status.
This is my proposal.
 
subnetweb said:
Yes this is exact formula.
Think what you can achive if you have this
PBN4=>PBN3=>PBN2=>PBN1=>Moneysite up to 9 levels.This is the final that Google Algorithm will supports this.
You all can't imagine how powerful SEO is this.
And yes another catch is that I suggest until Google Developers noticed this Article and indexed this to be moved to protected area VIP and so on.This is Gold Mine of Google.
I beg admin and moderators of BHW this Thread to be moved to protected area and reward OP with VIP status.
This is my proposal.
Click to expand...
the cascade series connection of amplifiers will not work for a single anchor.
will ban
for one anchor need one tandem sit1 sit2.
the weight is too big
optional
the devil is in the details

I think you do not understand the principle of amplification.
ask questions to understand this problem. The essence of it.
you don't see positive feedback, which is repeated in tandem on 4-5 occasions. The iteration gain remain not understood for you
Here are more questions to ask. about iteration.
they occur in a single tandem several times.
 
Last edited:
dondada7 said:
tuning?
Click to expand...
yes.
to website looked decent.
it is necessary to place the purpose of his existence. Unique selling proposition or unique infobusiness. Sites should carry favor for visitors. Otherwise, it is banned.
Вся мощность за счет статей и контента на домашней странице. Остальное не имеет большого значения.
I will not answer without an interpreter.
I'm afraid I will not correct understanding.
 
Nice OP.

I need a confirmation about this thread.

So, if we would like to test your technic, we need :
- fresh domain (site 1),
- fresh domain (site 2).

Content orientation :
Site 1 : Explaination on a single keyword niche
Site 2 : Commercial content on the same keyword niche (site 1).

Site 1 :
- Play with links (wikipedia & co.) ,
- No links on home page to articles ("stati" as you explained it),
- 8 articles with link to the home page,
- 1 link on the home page to the site 2 (optimized anchor).

Site 2 :
- Commercial content on home page,
- No link to the money site (for the moment),
- Links to the subpages autorized.

After many crawls by Google, your sites (1 & 2) are powerfull and you can link to your money site.
Is it right ?

Thanks for your reply OP :)
 
Don't worry about that Everyone is watching this thread very closely.

There is a reason why the big guns around here are not commenting.
 
Xcepty said:
Nice OP.

I need a confirmation about this thread.

So, if we would like to test your technic, we need :
- fresh domain (site 1),
- fresh domain (site 2).

Content orientation :
Site 1 : Explaination on a single keyword niche
Site 2 : Commercial content on the same keyword niche (site 1).

Site 1 :
- Play with links (wikipedia & co.) ,
- No links on home page to articles ("stati" as you explained it),
- 8 articles with link to the home page,
- 1 link on the home page to the site 2 (optimized anchor).

Site 2 :
- Commercial content on home page,
- No link to the money site (for the moment),
- Links to the subpages autorized.

After many crawls by Google, your sites (1 & 2) are powerfull and you can link to your money site.
Is it right ?

Thanks for your reply OP :)
Click to expand...
wait. I've said too much without a translator.
 
nikchaing said:
Is this the same tar729 from the sape forum?
Click to expand...

the owner of the exchange Sapa-one of my investors at the initial stage of my startup web service...do not forget about it.
https://www.searchengines.ru/kto_vlozhilsya_v_sozdanie.html
I recommend to translate

you don't trust the largest players on Russian market of seo?
Do you think that before investing in technology they are not invited to audit the best of its experts?
It would be naive.

I'm not lying when I said I'm one of the five leading specialists in Russian seo :)
I give you a lot of information for free. Appreciate it and not miss a moment to ask the important question.
 
Last edited:
Advertise on BHW
Status
Not open for further replies.
Sign up now!

Main Menu

Home Main Forum List Black Hat SEO White Hat SEO BHW Newbie Guide Blogging Black Hat Tools Social Media Downloads

Marketplace

Account Selling Content / Copywriting EBooks / Methods Hosting Misc Proxies For Sale SEO - Link building SEO - Packages Social Media Social Media - Panels Web Design More

Making Money

Affiliate Programs Hire a Freelancer IM Journeys Making Money Pay Per Click Site Flipping Want to Buy

BlackHat World

Dispute Resolution Forum Suggestions & Feedback Introductions Lounge
Back
Top