CheeseyGorditaCrunch
Registered Member
- Nov 2, 2015
- 97
- 51
The Good - Finalized a great backlink for website #1 today from a leader in my niche. They have backlinks from a lot of the most popular new stations across the U.S., links from many diversified sources as well as the top leaders in my niche. I got an do-follow, exact match anchor text for the 35,000 monthly keyword I'm sitting around position 13 for. I think I could finally break page 1, and at the best time of the year.
The Bad - I made a stupid mistake that I should have noticed with website #2. I've been outsourcing the product reviews which are around 400-500 words long, and I just now realized that the content is not unique. My writer has been taking sentences and sometimes copy pasting complete paragraphs. This will not do. I probably spend about $250 or $300 on this content, and I have another $90 article being written right now.
So what I'm going to do is turn this into another experiment. I think Internet Marketing is almost entirely using empirical evidence to test common SEO beliefs and then reproducing the positive effects on later websites. If I learn that I can rank rehashed, somewhat copied content, then that's a new trick in my book that I may be able to take advantage of later.
That being said, I will not be using that writer anymore so long as the content is not unique. While I will leave the current poor quality articles to see if I can rank them like the unique articles, the rest will be unique.
I also snagged a pretty good back-link for website #2. Cost was about $100 for 3 months, which is cheap, but the pages also get a few thousand impressions per month.
The Bad - I made a stupid mistake that I should have noticed with website #2. I've been outsourcing the product reviews which are around 400-500 words long, and I just now realized that the content is not unique. My writer has been taking sentences and sometimes copy pasting complete paragraphs. This will not do. I probably spend about $250 or $300 on this content, and I have another $90 article being written right now.
So what I'm going to do is turn this into another experiment. I think Internet Marketing is almost entirely using empirical evidence to test common SEO beliefs and then reproducing the positive effects on later websites. If I learn that I can rank rehashed, somewhat copied content, then that's a new trick in my book that I may be able to take advantage of later.
That being said, I will not be using that writer anymore so long as the content is not unique. While I will leave the current poor quality articles to see if I can rank them like the unique articles, the rest will be unique.
I also snagged a pretty good back-link for website #2. Cost was about $100 for 3 months, which is cheap, but the pages also get a few thousand impressions per month.