Parasites PWN! - Leeching From Authority Sites = $$$$

Does anyone else experience that it takes forever for Google to list the site in the SERPS for the keywords? They're all indexed, but not showing for relevant keywords.

Depends on a lot of factors but sure. It can take a loong time. For instance, the first YT video I ever spam ranked took >>4 months of spamming just to show on page 1 for 1, 4 word phrase, 720 SM keyword. Then an additional 2-3 weeks to show for it's broader, 3 word phrase (4,000 SM). THEN, it took nearly a month after that to rank for 2 variations of its broader phrase. Which I didn't expect to happen at all I just kept spamming.

But that 1 video made me a good deal of money so it was worth it.

I've had other keywords rank in 2 months. Some in 3, some never rank. There's just so many factors that come into play. I just saw some dude rank for a very competitive hosting keyword using a facebook page + PBN in only 2 months.

All in all, the real goal I've learned (with spam parasites) is to just throw a bunch of shit at the wall and see what sticks. Seems on average out of every 10 campaigns (10 different niches) 2-3 will rank with ease, 3-4 will show vague improvements & I keep them live, 3-4 don't do shit and I shut it down. Also, since I'm seeing dudes ranking FB pages real fast with PBN links that's something I plan on testing very soon. I'm in the process of building out a PBN myself. But I'm digging deep through these guys networks and noticing some super shitty, but very efficient marketing. Like all PBN sites 3 pages deep, duplicate content everywhere, interlinking between the PBN, footprints everywhere... meanwhile that PBN is keeping 2 FB pages, 2 .coms and 1 .org all in the top 4 of Googe. For keywords that could easily make $500-$1000 / day.

This is why I gotta get my PBN skills in order. If some idiot can rank a 40k month buyer keyword with 94 links from 30 something shitty PBN sites (just 1/5 of the platforms he's ranking) I'm sure I can do better. I know I can do better. Just a matter of technicalities at this point. :)

-BB
 
Last edited:
Heh.. You're waiting for someone to prove it works in 2015? God what is it with you people... Test it yourself! Stop waiting to be spoon fed every single grain of rice. It really isn't hard to see parasites work all you have to do is google something then open your eyes you'll see parasites all over the top results, there is also a parasite finding guide posted a few posts back from SERPWoo which teaches you how to find parasites ranking in YOUR niche - it's doesn't get any simpler! Sick of repeating myself here.

No t0mmy I'm not asking to be spoonfed lol but I really don't want to enter a quicksand in SERP. what I mean by that is just knowing that parasite ranked top doing give you the complete picture if they have PBN mofos linking to them, it's a quicksand which no matter how hard you spam you will not out rank it. All the money is in the top 3 SERP. ... also I don't honestly know why I need to use serpwoo or the guide you posted to find parasite because can't I just Google the keyword and see if parasites are ranked top or am I missing something?

Depends on a lot of factors but sure. It can take a loong time. For instance, the first YT video I ever spam ranked took >>4 months of spamming just to show on page 1 for 1, 4 word phrase, 720 SM keyword. Then an additional 2-3 weeks to show for it's broader, 3 word phrase (4,000 SM). THEN, it took nearly a month after that to rank for 2 variations of its broader phrase. Which I didn't expect to happen at all I just kept spamming.

But that 1 video made me a good deal of money so it was worth it.

I've had other keywords rank in 2 months. Some in 3, some never rank. There's just so many factors that come into play. I just saw some dude rank for a very competitive hosting keyword using a facebook page + PBN in only 2 months.

All in all, the real goal I've learned (with spam parasites) is to just throw a bunch of shit at the wall and see what sticks. Seems on average out of every 10 campaigns (10 different niches) 2-3 will rank with ease, 3-4 will show vague improvements & I keep them live, 3-4 don't do shit and I shut it down. Also, since I'm seeing dudes ranking FB pages real fast with PBN links that's something I plan on testing very soon. I'm in the process of building out a PBN myself. But I'm digging deep through these guys networks and noticing some super shitty, but very efficient marketing. Like all PBN sites 3 pages deep, duplicate content everywhere, interlinking between the PBN, footprints everywhere... meanwhile that PBN is keeping 2 FB pages, 2 .coms and 1 .org all in the top 4 of Googe. For keywords that could easily make $500-$1000 / day.

This is why I gotta get my PBN skills in order. If some idiot can rank a 40k month buyer keyword with 94 links from 30 something shitty PBN sites (just 1/5 of the platforms he's ranking) I'm sure I can do better. I know I can do better. Just a matter of technicalities at this point. :)

-BB

God... There are keyword which can generate 1000 bucks a freaking day and isn't some brand name?? Stuff like that pumps me of and gives me confidence there is serious bank to be made in 2015. I really hope it's not a lead gen type keyword. Need to revamp on sniffing competitors PBN.
 
also I don't honestly know why I need to use serpwoo or the guide you posted to find parasite because can't I just Google the keyword and see if parasites are ranked top or am I missing something?BN.

Clearly you're not the best at reading. No one said you NEED to use anything it was merely a helpful suggestion.. Actually if you read again or read the countless times I've now said this to people like yourself - open google, check some keywords, play a game of spot the parasite.

This shit isn't hard but I don't think you will grasp it based on your attitude it seems like you do want everything handed to you without putting in any work in... Do competitor research to check their link profiles before starting obviously.. here you go i wrote a guide on it just last night...

http://www.blackhatworld.com/blackhat-seo/white-hat-seo/746351-complete-noobz-guide-competitor-link-research.html
 
Last edited:
Depends on a lot of factors but sure. It can take a loong time. For instance, the first YT video I ever spam ranked took >>4 months of spamming just to show on page 1 for 1, 4 word phrase, 720 SM keyword. Then an additional 2-3 weeks to show for it's broader, 3 word phrase (4,000 SM). THEN, it took nearly a month after that to rank for 2 variations of its broader phrase. Which I didn't expect to happen at all I just kept spamming.

But that 1 video made me a good deal of money so it was worth it.

I've had other keywords rank in 2 months. Some in 3, some never rank. There's just so many factors that come into play. I just saw some dude rank for a very competitive hosting keyword using a facebook page + PBN in only 2 months.

All in all, the real goal I've learned (with spam parasites) is to just throw a bunch of shit at the wall and see what sticks. Seems on average out of every 10 campaigns (10 different niches) 2-3 will rank with ease, 3-4 will show vague improvements & I keep them live, 3-4 don't do shit and I shut it down. Also, since I'm seeing dudes ranking FB pages real fast with PBN links that's something I plan on testing very soon. I'm in the process of building out a PBN myself. But I'm digging deep through these guys networks and noticing some super shitty, but very efficient marketing. Like all PBN sites 3 pages deep, duplicate content everywhere, interlinking between the PBN, footprints everywhere... meanwhile that PBN is keeping 2 FB pages, 2 .coms and 1 .org all in the top 4 of Googe. For keywords that could easily make $500-$1000 / day.

This is why I gotta get my PBN skills in order. If some idiot can rank a 40k month buyer keyword with 94 links from 30 something shitty PBN sites (just 1/5 of the platforms he's ranking) I'm sure I can do better. I know I can do better. Just a matter of technicalities at this point. :)

-BB

Thanks for the insight!

Do you just let GSA rip, or do you turn it off from time to time?
 
Clearly you're not the best at reading. No one said you NEED to use anything it was merely a helpful suggestion.. Actually if you read again or read the countless times I've now said this to people like yourself - open google, check some keywords, play a game of spot the parasite.

This shit isn't hard but I don't think you will grasp it based on your attitude it seems like you do want everything handed to you without putting in any work in... Do competitor research to check their link profiles before starting obviously.. here you go i wrote a guide on it just last night...

http://www.blackhatworld.com/blackh...ete-noobz-guide-competitor-link-research.html

I'm not looking to get spoonfed man, im just pessimistic and very skeptical. Read traffic leak.
two days back. I will start a bloody journey thread to show how serious I am. Sick of being poor. Thanks for this thread and the one you linked. Will read them carefully. Also I do through entire threads before posting.
 
Im just pessimistic and very skeptical.

With all due respect but you will remain poor with that attitude man, you need to pay your dues, test, fuck up and learn what you did wrong, improve it test and fuck it up again that is how you make money in SEO/IM, if your not willing or you maintain that piss-pot mentality you have right now, go get yourself a or don't quite your dayjob cus this is not for you.
 
no one has an opinion on my question? seems like responding to negative people is more fun lol
 
this is such a great thread. I dont understand all these dummies saying it doesnt work.

One thing i musunderstood was the affliate angle. I thought this method would work for ranking your money site.

I have a very reputable parasite that is linking to my money site. I am planning on blasting a couple url shorters, a tweet that links to the parasite and a couple 2.0s that link to the parasite.

can anyone shed some light on how they think this will work? I am going to try it anyways but im just wondering since most people seem to be using this method differently

Yeah man this question has been answered several times... you're not using it as a parasite if you are linking to your money site then you are using it as a normal link or buffer. The point of parasites is to rank them quickly unlike conventional sites and direct to an offer from them. Using them to pass link juice to a money site has never been something I've paid any notice to...
 
Hey Tommy, this is awesome. I've got my parasite ranked in a few days thanks to it being non-competitive yet. However, it's only around 5-15 position in average of around 80 keywords. I must let gsa do its magic. However, it links to a money site review page and not to a redirect offer. I've got to move on to other projects, and test and test.

Ah, and one more thing: my evernote account is getting full of your articles! thanks so much
 
I'm still running some serious parasite testing. When I get a moment I'll post up some figures and results.
 
Just need to clear up some points, so please bear with me.


  • Under what metrics do you believe for the given keywords, its best to build a parasite page and rank it over creating your own niche and ranking it? If there are lots of Ebay/Amazon/Yahoo answers shown in the top 10 SERPs, is making the parasite the right way to tackle it?
  • When people mentioned to build parasite in "churn and burn" style, do they mean if I create one high quality article and publish it on a single web 2.0 lets say blogspot and then create spun version of it and keep making more and more blogspot? Or do they mean to create one high quality article and to publish across all web 2.0s? Spambomb with backlinks and see which web 2.0 ranks the highest?
 
Okay, here's my update. All of these are UK based and have at least 5000 searches a month (according to Adwords keyword planner)

Wordpress.com
GSA Links - 11,843
Position - 27

Google sites
GSA links - 3,607
Position - 1 (but a crap keyword)

Tumblr
GSA links - 11,353
Position - nowhere

Topix
GSA links - 3,825
Position - nowhere

Yahoo answers
GSA links - 3,900
Position - nowhere

Kindle
GSA links tier 1 - 323
GSA links tier 2 - 710
GSA links tier 3 - 903
Position - 20

Hubpages
GSA links - 6,892
Position - nowhere (was about 90ish)
 
Alright, I'll say it... I fail to see how this is any different than traditional tiered blasting of web 2.0's. You pick a 3rd party site (essentially a web2.0 or social) and then spam blast the hell out of it. This sounds aan awful lot like a new name for a tactic that has been around forever. This used to work great with MySpace pages back in the day. I'm not saying it won't work now, but why call it a parasite rather than a T1 or a web2.0?
 
Alright, I'll say it... I fail to see how this is any different than traditional tiered blasting of web 2.0's. You pick a 3rd party site (essentially a web2.0 or social) and then spam blast the hell out of it. This sounds aan awful lot like a new name for a tactic that has been around forever. This used to work great with MySpace pages back in the day. I'm not saying it won't work now, but why call it a parasite rather than a T1 or a web2.0?

Heh... this ain't nothing new dude, as I've said countless times now this is as old as tea ffs.. on every other IM forum I frequent it's talked about daily, but seems like "BHW" is lacking in it.. so thought I'd try to help eradicate that.. Well there's a bit more effort to it than that if you actually want to get somewhere - the hunt for "prime" parasites is a complete mission in itself.. find the perfect one which isn't raped yet and you're on to a winner.. but yeah ;)
 
Back
Top