Google Pulls Out oF RUSSIA!

Status
Not open for further replies.
There was no genocide, that was my statement, there was war

Well. to be fair, I bet even the staunchest national socialists kept on denying the Holocaust until the day they died. Not all Serbs live in a state of delusion though, thank god. But by all means, keep on being a living anachronism if it gets you through the day.
 
That same rule applies to America. Keep in mind that Fox, ABC, NBC, CNN, etc.. are all controlled by Uncle Sam. So what they are permitted to report on must comply with Obama's propaganda machine.

The same rules don't apply at all actually.
cD0v0OS

source

Unless you believe that wikipedia must also comply with the fascist Obama regime that is.
 
The same rules don't apply at all actually.
cD0v0OS

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_freedom_indices

Unless you believe that wikipedia must also comply with the fascist Obama regime that is.

Wikipedia also believes that ads on websites are anti-freedom.
 
Wikipedia also believes that ads on websites are anti-freedom.

No, they believe that ads on Wikipedia diametrically oppose Wikipedia's purpose (the purpose of being a neutral, unbiased encyclopedia).

Regardless, your misinformed opinion about Wikipedia's stance on advertising has nothing to do with the sources cited in that particular article.
 
@grizzy your grapic is a poor joke

Am asking really myself if you are unable to see yourself about the neutrality of this graphic source

@trepanated

Why ?They are discussing in a civil manner.No one is using abusive words or anything.Its better to dicuss than using real force .
Each country has its own propaganda and own view.If people want to unite they need to learn to talk.
I'm currently in an eastern country which is full of hate of germans because of ww2 even after 70 years.But guess what they are full of hate because they only know
the side of their countries propaganda.When listening to it i can tell you it seems like this country has white dress even in reality it was a major factor for breaking out ww2 and their bad side of the history got completly deleted/forgaten .
But a good side is when people from these 2 nations are meeting in person they mostly like each user seeing there is no diffrence between them and that they even have the same intrest
 
No, they believe that ads on Wikipedia diametrically oppose Wikipedia's purpose (the purpose of being a neutral, unbiased encyclopedia).

Regardless, your misinformed opinion about Wikipedia's stance on advertising has nothing to do with the sources cited in that particular article.

Its not a legit source, they are just saying Russia is not democratic because the people coming up with the list are off another culture.

Also they can remain unbiased, they have enough traffic to demand their own terms when it comes to ads.
 
There was no genocide, that was my statement, there was war, Serbs were fighting Muslims, they were killing each other, it was carnage.

Prior to Srebrenica muslims destroyed all the Serbian villages around Srebrenica, killed all the population and they were protected in Srebrenica by UN troops.
When people came home to see that their daughters and wifes were killed, they did what they did. Killed majority of male population in the city.

Was it wrong? Yes. Would I do it? I hope I would never find an answer to that question.

http://www.ic-mp.org/press-releases/over-7000-srebrenica-victims-recovered/

Interesting link. That is why I have stated that all sides were not perfect. But I would never deny those accusations because they HAVE happened, just like the genocide happened. Now in your opinion, it wasn't a genocide because there was a war going on, which is right. But there were 50+ children victims, were they part of the war? No. They were innocent as the bosnian serbs that have died at the hands of the muslim extremists. Naser Oric was no good man, just like Mladic was no good man. If they were protected, then the 7k deaths would not have happened. But denying the genocide is just wrong and good mouthing Milosevic is also wrong, but I guess that's just my opinion. Although, you've ignored the quotes from one of your Leaders, which is Biljana Plavsic. Is there a particual reason why?
 
http://www.ic-mp.org/press-releases/over-7000-srebrenica-victims-recovered/

Interesting link. That is why I have stated that all sides were not perfect. But I would never deny those accusations because they HAVE happened, just like the genocide happened. Now in your opinion, it wasn't a genocide because there was a war going on, which is right. But there were 50+ children victims, were they part of the war? No. They were innocent as the bosnian serbs that have died at the hands of the muslim extremists. Naser Oric was no good man, just like Mladic was no good man. If they were protected, then the 7k deaths would not have happened. But denying the genocide is just wrong and good mouthing Milosevic is also wrong, but I guess that's just my opinion. Although, you've ignored the quotes from one of your Leaders, which is Biljana Plavsic. Is there a particual reason why?
I said it was not genocide cause it was not genocide, it was war crime. Biljana Plavsic? Please.....she is left in the ruins of the history, no one will hate her in the SEO forums, not anyone will quote her, she is insignificant like you and me, even more.

P.S. No one is my leader, especially Serbian politicians, bunch of losers sold for a fist of dollars.
 
@grizzy your grapic is a poor joke

It's not my graphic. It's based off of data collected by a massive group of non-government independent research and educational institutes from countries all around the world. Was that really your attempt to counter the claim that Russia has shite freedom of press?

oh please, you really believe in that?
Sure, I believe that's their goal. Are they able to 100% eliminate all bias? Nope. But again, that really has nothing to do with the particular sources cited in the article does it?
 
Each and every dead of civilians is horrible.
In WW1 arround 10% civilians died
In WW2 arround 40% civilians died
In current US wars arround 90% civilians die (result of their pseudo high targeted weapon)


500.000 childs murdered and the us foreign minister telling the price is worth it.
How sick is that ?US is attacking Afghanistan because of 3000 dead people and here she claims that murdering 500.000 childs is worth the price ?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I said it was not genocide cause it was not genocide, it was war crime. Biljana Plavsic? Please.....she is left in the ruins of the history, no one will hate her in the SEO forums, not anyone will quote her, she is insignificant like you and me, even more.

P.S. No one is my leader, especially Serbian politicians, bunch of losers sold for a fist of dollars.

What is wrong with Biljana? She pled guilty to the crimes she was charged for. At least someone is being honest. A crime against humanity, call it whatever you want it my friendo. Although I am done with this thread as it'll get closed soon anyway I assume.

tito.jpg


It's getting late.


Whatever your ethnciity may be, still wish you the best as a fellow bhwer.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top