T2 links - GSA is dead

[moonlighsunligh]

i use them for tier 1 .i stopped building tier 2 for about 2 months.only tier 1

Even with real web 2.0's you had the T2 problems? (such as wordpress.com)

 

[moonlighsunligh]

Ah it's okay. I've seen you about on the forum and you seem to know your stuff pretty good I was starting to wonder if your account had been taken over by a newbie or something ha ha!

Anyway, back to the problem. The short answer to your problem IMHO is have patience, give it a week or two and see how your SERPS pan out.

If it's still tanked then it's time to re-visit your strategy and get to tweaking.

GSA is definitely not dead, believe me, it's one of the best tools out there for reasonably cheap ranking power.

In the meantime, have you looked up Matthew Woodwards video tuts on tiered link building? For anyone fairly new to GSA it's a must watch guide IMHO.

I read the http://www.matthewwoodward.co.uk/tutorials/the-ultimate-guide-to-tiered-link-building-part-6/
and http://www.jacobking.com/broken-tiered-link-building

I do a bit differently since I use 100% manually written articles on T1 and manually spun ones on T2 and T3.

I do just one post per T1 otherwise the job would be to time consuming or costly.

 

[twilightofidols]

Ranking a web site doesn't quite work that way.

It's very common for rankings to drop after link building, and then rebound at a later time. I have pages on my sites that disappear from the SERP for months at a time after link building for certain keywords and reappear later on the first page.

You should be thinking in terms of months, not in terms of days.

 

[TheTysons]

You need to diversity t1 as well, also what is your anchor distribution like?

 

[Execute]

Are you sure that your links were indexed or even seen by Google in that 5 days you waited? Try and wait at least 2 weeks for any definite changes.

 

[moonlighsunligh]

Ranking a web site doesn't quite work that way.

It's very common for rankings to drop after link building, and then rebound at a later time. I have pages on my sites that disappear from the SERP for months at a time after link building for certain keywords and reappear later on the first page.

You should be thinking in terms of months, not in terms of days.

This is a 1K searches per month keyword term. Probably the easiest keyword i have ever found and at the start ot was #20. Now it is #16.

It isn't worth to wait for months for such a keyword.

For some big keyword maybe a month would be realistic but not much more than that. After all ranking usually last for few months long before site got de-ranked anyways, so waiting for few months doesn't make much sense.

 

[moonlighsunligh]

Are you sure that your links were indexed or even seen by Google in that 5 days you waited? Try and wait at least 2 weeks for any definite changes.

Very few but I am working on that. I am adding pligg links to T2 and I put all of these link into a indexer.

 

[moonlighsunligh]

You need to diversity t1 as well, also what is your anchor distribution like?

T1 - Web 2.0. T2 and T3 - All GSA platforms. Anchors are (T1) - 10% main kw, 10% LSI, rest are urls and general anchors. On T2 I use 15-20% main keyword and the rest is the same.

 

[Laubster]

Interesting point BUT Google only has access to organic traffic (the traffic they generate). With that being said, I really cant think of a way for Google to know a specific page gets X visitors in a specific time as you are totally forgetting about people that type your url, come from backlinjs, come from social media and so on.

It doesnt mean that a site that gets 10 visitors a day from google doesnt have more visitors from other sources and therefore generating backlinks.

This is right. People give Google's algo way too much credit. Thinking there is some conspiracy where they spy on your site and know how many visitors should have based on every single hypothetical keyword ranking you have. It doesn't work that way. Do your onsite SEO right, build high quality links to your site, boom - rankings. Might not happen overnight, but it's not as complicated as some people make it.

 

[SERPdaddy]

Build manual Web 2, Social Bookmarking, Social Profile and PDF
Use FSCnetwork or RankWyz as tier2 with article builder
Then use GSA, Senuke and Scrapebox for Tier3

 

[mlkykhan]

i posted few weeks ago about tier 2 links.the last g00gle update i think has focused on that.i had done some senuke campaigns to a site of mine and after 3-4 senuke campaign my site start ranking page 1-2 and page #3.but i was looking for better results and i start building tier 2-3 links to my senuke links and guess what,my site got fucked.i said WTF is not first site i got fucked,so i keep building tier 2-3 links to other sites also and i got them fucked too.i am testing now on another website to do tier 2 same quality as tier 1 links ,all with senuke.gsa just can't build quality links,it can just build quantity

I used hand spun articles on Tier 2 using Senuke. Everything is going good so far. Ranked a youtube video on page one for 4 keywords and one keyword is #1 while a few on 2nd page.

 

[moonlighsunligh]

5 days...? Really? I don't want to sound like my dad but you youngsters want everything yesterday It is very common for sites to disappear and then come back in. I have had one site go from numbers 9 through to 62 (and back up again) in the space of 2 weeks and it now sits at number 21 so more work needed.
This will always happen when you are actively building links.

So now it is a almost a month but the rank is hardly improved (#11 - #12) and i have build few thousands GSA links and added them to a indexer. Also i have built a few high pr comments. 5-6 web 2.0 sites that have links to my site are on top 100 in the niche for the main keyword of my site.

Edit: I am now adding more quality web 2.0 as T2 using Zsubmitter on the 4 other sites I am working on as well as this site. So you think something like 100 web 2.0 as T2 + 2000 GSA as T3 would be OK? Each of the sites would have around 10 manually made web 2.0 sites with unique content as T1.

 

[AsgharSK]

Maybe GSA work properly ..