Does Youtube churn and "burn" work with Scrapebox blasts?

[Heraclitus]

Hi! I was wondering if ranking YT video with churn and burn method (aka spamming ) works with scrapebox blasts.

I am currently testing this method but has anyone else tried this?

Any related information / suggestions / experiences are very welcome!

Seems after all that it doesn't work this way with scrapebox. But what the hell, I got GSA

 

[CityNomad]

It doesn't work anymore...

 

[Heraclitus]

It doesn't work anymore...

You mean YT churn and burn or scrapebox blasts?

Thanks for replying

 

[BassTrackerBoats]

Blasting videos does not seem to have an impact on their rankings. We have been testing that the past 3 or 4 weeks and have not seen any significant movement.

 

[alexistheboss15]

danggggggg

there goes my GSA for youtube plan

 

[Heraclitus]

Blasting videos does not seem to have an impact on their rankings. We have been testing that the past 3 or 4 weeks and have not seen any significant movement.

I'm pretty sure it works, just don't know if it works with scrapebox blasts.

 

[BassTrackerBoats]

danggggggg

there goes my GSA for youtube plan

Yeah, and what I am using is more aggressive than GSA or SB.

 

[Heraclitus]

danggggggg

there goes my GSA for youtube plan

GSA can be used for other things apart from youtube blasting, if you just raised the quality of your projects a bit I'm sure you could rank plenty of stuff.

 

[mickyfu]

Never really been into churn and burn videos, but when I have tried with simply mass links, they seem to vanish quick.

 

[Heraclitus]

Never really been into churn and burn videos, but when I have tried with simply mass links, they seem to vanish quick.

I have ranked a couple of videos with the GSA, I just made the project medium quality and only send ~2000-5000 verified backlinks, idk it ranked in a few days.

 

[Scritty]

Link promotion of Youtube videos certainly works. Still does as effectively as ever.
However, I've not used Scrapebox alone to do it for a long time, not really varied enough.

A good link promotion for me is a few hundred decent links not millions of crap ones. Sorting through the lists of potential link targets for 30 minutes and picking those with some relevance and decent quality metrics still works. With enough targets to choose from you are bound to find some that are "on the nose" for your niche and your vid

Scritty

 

[alaltaierii]

Yes it works but is not enough to rank. Scrapebox blast + gsa blast+web 2.0's with video embed = Win.
Ps: Make sure to have a good anchor text diversity when blasting.

 

[BreaknBrix]

Blasting videos does not seem to have an impact on their rankings. We have been testing that the past 3 or 4 weeks and have not seen any significant movement.

No offense man but blasting videos is how I've been ranking them for the last 18 months.

I make a full time income just from blasting YT videos with GSA.

This is the method I use -

1) [Most Important Step] I use a custom keyword app that finds ONLY video keywords. So basically, it will scrape through thousands of keywords, but it only pulls out keywords that have videos in the top 5 of Google. If a keyword does not have a video, it filters OUT those keywords. This way, 100% of the keywords I go after ALREADY have a video ranking in the top 5. Then the bot also extracts views, likes, searches, backlinks and other shit.

2) Once I have my list, I go after video keywords with the most searches and least amount of competition. Depending on the criteria I set, the app highlights all the best keywords in green, and those are the ones I go after.

3) I make the videos and upload them.

4) I start boosting them with retention views and likes. I also get subs and comments.

5) I set up a campaign in GSA for each video. Low competition keywords get 1 tier high competition get 5 tier and really high competition I mix in high pr web2.0 links from blackhatlinks. All links get send to indexification and I regularly send the same batch of links multiple times. These helps increase my index rate.

I have 114 campaigns right now running on my server. More than 60 of those campaigns are just maintenance campaigns to maintain videos that are already on page 1.
The other campaigns are newer.

It typically takes me between 4-12 weeks to rank a video on page 1. Some videos have taken more than 4 months just to hit page 1.

With all that said, I only have about 10 campaigns set up after the May 15th update. And those campaigns were only started about 12 days ago. 1 video has already moved up to #6 on Google. The rest are still being boosted / blasted.

What I can say for a fact, I was ranking videos VERY consistently with this method for the last 18 months. The only thing I can't say is what if any effect this last update has had. But previous to that spam was working GREAT to rank videos. You just have to target video keywords. And I'll see in 4-6 weeks whether spam is still working (which I expect it will). You just have to target video keywords.

-BB

 

[stableserps]

Use GSA for a more diverse backlink profile, blog comments on their own wouldnt do much.

 

[mickyfu]

What I found to work quite well on YouTube, and forgive me because I do not work on it much, is video embeds along with views, likes and related comments.

 

[kingoptimizer]

No offense man but blasting videos is how I've been ranking them for the last 18 months.

I make a full time income just from blasting YT videos with GSA.

This is the method I use -

1) [Most Important Step] I use a custom keyword app that finds ONLY video keywords. So basically, it will scrape through thousands of keywords, but it only pulls out keywords that have videos in the top 5 of Google. If a keyword does not have a video, it filters OUT those keywords. This way, 100% of the keywords I go after ALREADY have a video ranking in the top 5. Then the bot also extracts views, likes, searches, backlinks and other shit.

2) Once I have my list, I go after video keywords with the most searches and least amount of competition. Depending on the criteria I set, the app highlights all the best keywords in green, and those are the ones I go after.

3) I make the videos and upload them.

4) I start boosting them with retention views and likes. I also get subs and comments.

5) I set up a campaign in GSA for each video. Low competition keywords get 1 tier high competition get 5 tier and really high competition I mix in high pr web2.0 links from blackhatlinks. All links get send to indexification and I regularly send the same batch of links multiple times. These helps increase my index rate.

I have 114 campaigns right now running on my server. More than 60 of those campaigns are just maintenance campaigns to maintain videos that are already on page 1.
The other campaigns are newer.

It typically takes me between 4-12 weeks to rank a video on page 1. Some videos have taken more than 4 months just to hit page 1.

With all that said, I only have about 10 campaigns set up after the May 15th update. And those campaigns were only started about 12 days ago. 1 video has already moved up to #6 on Google. The rest are still being boosted / blasted.

What I can say for a fact, I was ranking videos VERY consistently with this method for the last 18 months. The only thing I can't say is what if any effect this last update has had. But previous to that spam was working GREAT to rank videos. You just have to target video keywords. And I'll see in 4-6 weeks whether spam is still working (which I expect it will). You just have to target video keywords.

-BB

Thanks for the info. Any chance we can know which video keyword research tool you use. VS doesn't seem to work anymore.

 

[umerjutt00]

I don't think scrapebox will work that good because all it can do is comments, trackbacks or guestbooks. You need more anchor text control and platform diversity which scrapebox can't provide.

 

[xha44a]

There's a YouTube ranking with some serious pingback spam for one of the most spammy and scammy terms out there right now. See how others do it and copy them.

 

[Heraclitus]

What I found to work quite well on YouTube, and forgive me because I do not work on it much, is video embeds along with views, likes and related comments.

Video embeds certainly works, I'm adding my videos inside my spinned articles and aplo point a backlink to the video on the same article. Rank like shit

 

[Heraclitus]

I don't think scrapebox will work that good because all it can do is comments, trackbacks or guestbooks. You need more anchor text control and platform diversity which scrapebox can't provide.

That's what I thought.
If only it worked ...