[Guide] The Art of Super Web 2.0 Creation

What does everyone recommend using in terms of tier 2 links for a super web 2.0 network?
 
very useful guide. I do something very similar. I start with the base 5 pages - about, contact, welcome and then 2 related keywords. If this particular web 2 starts ranking I will expand it and grow it out to be more of a powerful asset in its own right. PS tired link building still works the same as it always has as as long as you know how to do it right. Mathew Woodwards guide was great, though Jacob king added a much need updated. Still works for me just fine with Jacobs tweaks applied.
 
NathanEG
user-offline.png


icon1.png
Re: [Guide] The Art of Super Web 2.0 Creation 2014




Thanks for sharing my guide :)
Thanks OP and THANKS NathanEG for providing this excellent guide,
and for agreeing to sharing it in the spirit of BHW.
My guess is that MANY BHW members are really appreciative of your work.
Cheers guys.
 
Great guide.
I would like to add something that you have to create and get links to your Web 20 blogs way BEFORE creating your website. This looks more natural and you can link to your site from them much powerfully.

Posted via Topify using iPhone/iPad
 
Last edited:
What does everyone recommend using in terms of tier 2 links for a super web 2.0 network?


The only tier two links that really seem to be making an impact right now are from private blog networks.

Here's what I do:

PBN Links: keyword-based anchors only

Tier two PBN links:
http://www.blackhatworld.com/blackh...eatable-price-up-750-posts-starting-15-a.html (like this one because of of the unlimited URLs / keywords)

High PR Blog Comments: generic anchor text for diluting the PBN links

For PR Comments:
http://www.blackhatworld.com/blackh...do-follow-manual-blog-commenting-service.html

Social Bookmarks: link and anchor diversity

For SB's:
http://www.blackhatworld.com/blackh...kmarks-reseller-price-2-3-free-drip-feed.html

* I only use keyword anchors with PBN links because they are obviously the most powerful

You can also toss in some 301 redirects, but this get's really costly / sketchy
 
Last edited:
The only tier two links that really seem to be making an impact right now are from private blog networks.

Here's what I do:

PBN Links: keyword-based anchors only

Tier two PBN links:
http://www.blackhatworld.com/blackh...eatable-price-up-750-posts-starting-15-a.html (like this one because of of the unlimited URLs / keywords)

High PR Blog Comments: generic anchor text for diluting the PBN links

For PR Comments:
http://www.blackhatworld.com/blackh...do-follow-manual-blog-commenting-service.html

Social Bookmarks: link and anchor diversity

For SB's:
http://www.blackhatworld.com/blackh...kmarks-reseller-price-2-3-free-drip-feed.html

* I only use keyword anchors with PBN links because they are obviously the most powerful

You can also toss in some 301 redirects, but this get's really costly / sketchy

Nathan, what is your experience with pointing the same web 2.0 tld site to different pages on the money site?

For instance:
Crockpot.wordpress(dot)com----->cookingmoneysite(dot)com/awesome-crockpots
Portabletoasters.wordpress(dot)com----->cookingmoneysite(dot)com/awesome-portable-toasters
Kitchenknives.wordpress(dot)com----->cookingmoneysite(dot)com/awesome-kitchen-knives

Are the links weaker because they are from the same domain? Thanks for this awesome guide, has helped me refine my method a little
 
One Question: if you use 30% brand name anchor and my name of my website is the exact keyword, it will be 30%+10% = 40% exact keyword? Sorry i dont understand much about this "brand name"...
 
Nathan, what is your experience with pointing the same web 2.0 tld site to different pages on the money site?

For instance:
Crockpot.wordpress(dot)com----->cookingmoneysite(dot)com/awesome-crockpots
Portabletoasters.wordpress(dot)com----->cookingmoneysite(dot)com/awesome-portable-toasters
Kitchenknives.wordpress(dot)com----->cookingmoneysite(dot)com/awesome-kitchen-knives

Are the links weaker because they are from the same domain? Thanks for this awesome guide, has helped me refine my method a little

Hey man, good question. I actually do this frequently and haven't seen diminishing returns. I just diversity on the page level, not the domain level.

I would probably avoid hitting one page with more than one web 2.0 from the same TLD. There's a lot of web 2.0 platforms out there, so there's really no reason to reuse the same TLD for a target page.

One Question: if you use 30% brand name anchor and my name of my website is the exact keyword, it will be 30%+10% = 40% exact keyword? Sorry i dont understand much about this "brand name"...

Those sample percentages apply to non-EMD websites. EMDs complicate things and you'll need to make adjustments to avoid getting penalized. Mainly, increasing your percentage of generic anchor text
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Excellent post! But I read some where that web 2.0's are turning nofollow now??

Any thoughts on this?
 
Hey Nathan what kinds of links can you use for generics for T1 links to up the percentage? Thanks
 
Excellent post! But I read some where that web 2.0's are turning nofollow now??

Any thoughts on this?

Just avoid the nofollow properties :P

Hey Nathan what kinds of links can you use for generics for T1 links to up the percentage? Thanks

I usually use blog comments (generic anchors), directories (Branded anchors), social bookmarks (generic anchors), and press releases (branded + generic) for TI. Pretty much anything honestly because that's "natural". I save all keyword-based anchors for my PBN, web 2.0s, or other strong links
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Wow, a web 2.0 guide that doesn't recommend blasting the shit out of higher tiers. Can you really build PA w/out blasting them or spending tons of money on high quality links (in which case a PBN is better)??
 
Wow, a web 2.0 guide that doesn't recommend blasting the shit out of higher tiers. Can you really build PA w/out blasting them or spending tons of money on high quality links (in which case a PBN is better)??

Yeah man, I'm not really into blasting / short-term results. From my experience, the high PR links will increase your PA very quickly (1-2 months). There are some cheap PBNs designed for T2 on this forum that will do the job. The one I listed above is my personal favorite, but others will work just fine
 
Anyone offer this kind of quality web 2.0's as a service?
 
Was looking for something like this. Good thing Wriper shared the link in another thread. Thanks!
 
thank you mate this will really helpful to me, have one question Is it a good idea to highlight (bold) our keywords in a web 2.0 articles
 
Great guide but it recommends jimdo.com PR8 in the list. Watch out that's a trap! Jimdo clearly has a disallow in its robot's text applied to all free accounts. I'm surprised it's listed here because it's useless. I've been doing this for years, if you want a list of the best performing 2.0's for actually making a difference to your rank and still being safe enough not get deleted by host if you do some link building then here it is: Yola.com; Tumblr.com; Weebly.com; Webs.com. If you want to use your 2.0's to rank in the SERPS then that's a different story, best ones for that are: Blogger.com/Blogspot.com; Slideshare.com; Hubpages; Squidoo.com; Wordpress.com . Also if you want to explode the potential of your 2.0's try adding some SAPE links.
 
Quick question @OP or @NathanEG

You didn't specifically mention how to approach this so I figured I'd ask:
When creating our seed article, would you recommend creating it on a page/site instead of releasing it as a scheduled post? Don't static sites get valued a lot more and are more SEO friendly and therefore are to be preferred over posts?
 
Quick question @OP or @NathanEG

You didn't specifically mention how to approach this so I figured I'd ask:
When creating our seed article, would you recommend creating it on a page/site instead of releasing it as a scheduled post? Don't static sites get valued a lot more and are more SEO friendly and therefore are to be preferred over posts?

I've personally always used posts because it seems more natural. The the "super" web 2.0s are basically mini blogs.
 
Back
Top