Good and Bad Web 2.0 Sites List

http://www.vmoptions.com/web-2-0-sites-list.php has the do follow marked with a few marked wrong. They posted a Yahoo blog web 2.0 link and for the life of me I could not get it to work. Then I realized you had to actually be logged into a Yahoo account before signing up for their blog beta. A duh moment I guess. lol

This site is perfect, and every day update.
 
More good sites

Code:
beep.com (probably slower at indexing I am testing)
sitew.org (was unidexable before, now I found it can get it indexed with very few backlinks)
snappages.com (probably slower at indexing I am testing this one as well)
webgarden.com
 
Last edited:
Lists are good but often misleading because web2.0s keep changing.

The problem with most such list is that they are found on the web and not posted without checking.

This is the list I use to build backlinks for my sites so everything is confirmed and 99% true.
 
Jimdo.com is sometimes nonindexable:
User-agent: *
Disallow: /
 
According to my view - there are only 15 to 20 top sites which are really good and gets indexed by Google.
 
Yes it is,

ucoz.com is not indexable as well:
User-agent: *
Disallow: /
 
According to my view - there are only 15 to 20 top sites which are really good and gets indexed by Google.

True. Many people use sites that are blocked from indexing in hope they will get indexed letter on. But they wouldn't.

Some use scrapebox which shows that these links are indexed which actually isn't true.
 
A lot of these sites see to be still good to use. I checked a few today:
Code:
weebly.com (Now they have become indexable - but slowly)
wordpress.com (Fast to index, sometimes deleted)
purevolume.com (doffolow)
 
Back
Top