Ranking Case Study (POST PENGUIN 3.0) | 5 CASE STUDIES

Status
Not open for further replies.
nullfo, do you can provide your verified links provider?

Cool case! Congrats!
 
It's really surprising that Case Study #4 hasn't brought any results yet!
 
Nice case study, will be interessting to see how fast the 3# got slapped.
 
I have read the whole thread twice already but i can't find anywhere information regarding exact searches for your keywords ? This case is not worth much if we don't know how big keywords are you targeting. If you are going for some small local keywords then it can be achieved on any way, it just depends on time, if they are some highly searched, highly popular and with strong competition keywords, then it is very interesting study.

By the way, to all of you asking for 301 redirect case, it will work, just give it a time. I am doing a similar thing with my own twist and it works, but it takes me 10-30 days to see any results, but when it starts ranking i usually get the great results in next 1-2 days.
Also, 301 method is a long lasting method, i have a web site on #1 spot for 100k keyword and it's there since February, it was going down to 2nd position sometime but 95% of time it's on 1st position, while all, direct churn and burn, sites i ranked on the same time, are dead for a long time already.
 
I have read the whole thread twice already but i can't find anywhere information regarding exact searches for your keywords ? This case is not worth much if we don't know how big keywords are you targeting. If you are going for some small local keywords then it can be achieved on any way, it just depends on time, if they are some highly searched, highly popular and with strong competition keywords, then it is very interesting study.

By the way, to all of you asking for 301 redirect case, it will work, just give it a time. I am doing a similar thing with my own twist and it works, but it takes me 10-30 days to see any results, but when it starts ranking i usually get the great results in next 1-2 days.
Also, 301 method is a long lasting method, i have a web site on #1 spot for 100k keyword and it's there since February, it was going down to 2nd position sometime but 95% of time it's on 1st position, while all, direct churn and burn, sites i ranked on the same time, are dead for a long time already.

I agree, the thread would be more interesting if we would know the competition for the keywords you chose.
 
He told that the keyword is between 400k to 500k

To OP

Definitely an inspiring thread.
 
Hey Nullfo
Wonderful case study.
Can I know more details about Study #3 - 250,000 Links Daily - Churn n' Burn like what is the process, you create directly backlinks to your money site or first you purchased power domain and create backlinks on power domain and redirect them?
 
He told that the keyword is between 400k to 500k

To OP

Definitely an inspiring thread.


Great if that's a true, but i would still like to heard from the OP it self. I assume that there are 5 different keywords.

By the way, why SSL on every site ? SSL does not give any impact on SEO ranking, on the other side it does give some sort of a confidence with visitors which should lead to better conversion, but it still does not make any impact on SEO, or there is something i don't know ?
 
What type of links are involved in case study 1?

Interesting that the links through the URL shortener are doing nothing, you use bit.ly for that?

Few years ago it worked exactly the same as pointing links directly at a site.

Also curious how case study #5 works out, don't expect much from it to be honest as amount of links / IP's / subnets also play a large role these days and with just 5 web2.0's you miss out on that. Perhaps that's also the reason why the URL shortener method doesn't perform as that's just 1 link, if you pointed it at a 301 redirect domain it would've worked though.
 
Last edited:
Amazing! Link blast is low quality tactic and if works as we can see in the #3 case study we've to be prepareted to see a lot of "money" sites on first pages. I don't know if this is a good condition for users!
For us is gold mine!
 
To all of you complaining about why I don't include more information, more than half of the questions asked were answered more than once in the previous pages.

You're pretty much asking me to reveal my keywords... yeah, not happening.
 
nullfo i have few questions

1.I dont understand something on #3 you do 250k links per day, okay, so when you reset you reuse the same domains, right ?

2.Are you getting traffic on #3 ? I had some experience ranking very high and no traffic at all on search volume keywords

3.How is the anchor text % ?
% Generic ?
% Domain ?
% Main Keyword ?
% Longtail keywords ( titles ) ?

Method #4 should have rankings, are you sure your short urls got indexed on google ?
Yeah, I use only unique URLs, but a lot of the same domains are used.

I got like 30 visits.


I spent some time trying to get the exact percentages correct, so I don't really want to share that.

Just saying one thing, though. Majority of the generic keywords that I am using are using the following generics:

here
click here
this link

I'm not using 300~ or so that everyone else does, I don't even think Google picks half of those up as generic.

"over here at this new website" is not a generic imo; stick with the most popular ones.
 
Day 4

Study #1 - N/A
Study #2 - N/A
Study #3 - N/A
Study #4 - N/A
Study #5 - #277

Lol burned before it churned like someone expected.

You missed my question about the links from study #1, I know the OP says authority links + social, but what are those authority links exactly?

One would think that authority links and real social signals are what Google wants to see, so I truly wonder what you classify as "authority" links, the social signals are obvious fake but what kind of public network did you use for those "authority" links? ALN or something?
 
Lol burned before it churned like someone expected.

You missed my question about the links from study #1, I know the OP says authority links + social, but what are those authority links exactly?

One would think that authority links and real social signals are what Google wants to see, so I truly wonder what you classify as "authority" links, the social signals are obvious fake but what kind of public network did you use for those "authority" links? ALN or something?
The site is still indexed on Google (site:xxxxx-xxx.org), so I can't say for sure.

Authority links, average PR of 4, DA/PA of 45 and max OBL of 5 (1-2 usually). The social signals are done using an automated system we had one of our coders from oDesk build. It's our own network, Authority+.

I think #3 will bring the most profits if it resurrects, but that won't be much of a long term site.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top