Fxphil's Tedious SEO Conspiracy GUIDE (Long Version)

[fxphil]

Hey thanks for all the feedback. My inbox blew up with messages. I will respond to all of them just hang in there. To answer the common question about my next guide on the 200k site, I should have enough data to put it out in the next 30 days. Here is a little taste in image below. Fist pic shows my tumblr links 2nd shows how many keywords I rank number one for not to mention the 700+ other ones. As you can see I started this site in November and build it rather nicely. The content on my sites are TOP NOTCH!! and so are my tumblr accounts as this is important and widely known however how it is connected is what makes this guide awesome.

I am ranking for over 800+ keywords 500 of which that are all within pages 1-2

 

[Kralj187]

I would only like to know what you base on this Google only allows you to rank for so many keywords??

Never heard of anything like that and I know that the strongest site in my niche ranks for thousands of keywords (though it has build huge authority over time)

 

[rob1977]

Nice read and can concurr with a lot of what you say.

Particularly what you get away with depends on the niche.

 

[fxphil]

Hi Kralj187,

Google will only allow so many keywords to rank per a niche and per a page. Look at this more as a way to not raise flags. Let me give you an example as those work best around here.

Take a niche involving "PAY Day Loans"
Let's say you have one page devoted to capitalizing on this keyword. Google knows that in the honor of sticking to it's own claims that backlinks should come from other people visiting your site. (less all other variables and just focusing on your question) google knows that "ORGANIC VISITORS" will not visit your site and make commented acnhor text links REPHRASING your payday loan keywords 1000's of times. This will raise flags and penlize you and it will actually penalize your site as a whole for that exact keyword. ( you are correct that longevity is a variable to the amount of keywords) The algorithm is not biased in terms of your site ranking for the exact term as another, everyone gets the same shot and from that point is where the penalizing starts or building begins. A page with 500 words with 250 of those words being filler words and 1-3% of those 250 being keywords puts you at around 9 keywords being targeted in your embedded article. These 9 words are what google will identify. These keywords can be turned to LSI and manipulated into possibly 100's of spun anchor texts. G takes this into account. They know with 9 keywords that the normal rate for a certain niche should only have so many spinable anchor texts someone can try to rank for organically speaking. When a new site maxes this specific number out and hits the linkbuilding hard google clearly knows this is non organic in nature.

I would only like to know what you base on this Google only allows you to rank for so many keywords??

Never heard of anything like that and I know that the strongest site in my niche ranks for thousands of keywords (though it has build huge authority over time)

 

[Reyone]

"-Formula for backlinks: visitors on site for more then 30 seconds x .10 = How many Daily backlinks should be created by you. This mean that you will build one link for every ten people that stay on your site for 30 seconds. You will also use IP?s from similar locations of your REAL visitors. Check your analytics for this data. (NoT GA, use statcounter or something else)"

Really? A lot of these points seem like mere assumptions rather than tested results.

Like, a lot of those points.

I honestly don't see much point on making any SEO guide since SEO is completely broken and you can take a site up through so many methods... from no links, to steady links to massive blasts.

Fair to say that if G wants to take your site down and they find links built, it does not matter how well you've hidden it... they will just simply put a penalty and you will go walking with your head down.

The only true way to stay on top is by not doing any link building, but hey, be my guest and spend a year and some good money on that.

Anyways, guide is good, clap clap, one more to the wagon; unfortunately, most of the time things are gonna change week by week.


And if I'm wrong and these are tested results, please bring the tests to the table so we can actually see hard evidence about it.

 

[fxphil]

The title of this guide is suppose to invoke other opinions on the matter. With hardly any new information to get the gears turning in seo most of the things are just testing new things. These have worked for me, I have tested this out but not on every single niche. Just a few authority health sites and some micro niche electronic sites.

I did not pay for any backlinks and 10 a day would take 5 mins

MY next guide will be for one capitalizing on a 200k Exact search keyword that I have applied this to. I posted some pictures of a taste of some of the results and more will be released in the new guide.

"-Formula

 

[kristur]

Hey, interesting stuff man. Way advanced for me but I like learning by standing on the shoulders of giants!

I wanted to ask you to clarify this point here:

-In regards to On Page in article links, sentences with links need to be at least 8 words as it triggers a flag suggesting spam (it looks spammy to the algorithm and counts as a docked point.)

Am I correct in understanding this so that the sentence which a link is placed in needs to be at least 8 words long? Anything below 8 words triggers a spam flag?

Thanks again for the insights!

 

[linkking]

Interesting Read. Thanks

 

[Jodly]

I had fun reading it! I agree with you on all of the points. I do believe that comment backlinks are good for improving your search engine rankings, but you do have to move to another country and use a private proxy before writing a comment because otherwise Google will track the IP back to you and your site and give you a slap in the face.

 

[fxphil]

Thanks Kristur,

Anything less then 8 words comes off across as SPECULATIVE HYPERLINKING. G has everything down to a science more so mathematics then science. They did the math and as a variable they know that if your article is X long with an average sentence being Y long then the chances of your having a backlink in short sentence means it could be "eCommerce related, spam related, quality related" Like I said before this formula is niche based but I have seen a benefit when adding my link in to sentences longer then 8 words long.

Hey,Way advanced!

 

[jimmyg]

I'm sorry, but all these theories about G tracking spammy comments to IP addresses is so much BS. When a comment shows up on a website, G has no idea about the IP address of the comment poster, what country they are from, or anything else. The only two ways G could get this information is if A.) GA code is on the PHP form submission page (no one puts GA code here!) or... B.) The proxy or the webhost is using G's free DNS servers, in which case G can track everything. This would be incredibly rare.

When you get talking about IP addresses, I have to think you don't really understand how the Internet works.

 

[fxphil]

Thanks for the comment Jimmy,

Yes you are right without Ga or Adsense or Webmaster and no footprints they will not know. But with with GA and Webmaster they will 100% know. It is the very point of analytic data to provide the IP data alongside location, time on site, etc. . Here is how I'm going to correct you in way you can understand. When you login to your G "any product of theirs" your Ip is logged. When you you comment on something an IP is logged if they match they know who you are and the sites you operate. 2nd about IP location this is very important as stated as if you have a local USA company getting backlinks from Russian IP address's it will be fictitious.

Further more you must be thinking that your IP is dynamic and not static so how would they know? Well they log every time and your ISP has a list of IP ranges it can use so they may not know you but when they see someone logging into the same G accounts from one location that can narrow it down.


Yes, using proxies does to an extent stop google from getting to know you but you also need the right type of proxies and not the public transparent ones or ones that have locations that have no business creating organic looking back links. All these things have been tested on my own niches


Thanks for your opinion.

I'm sorry

 

[rootjazz]

Was just searching for any threads that mentioned tumblr bot and came across this.

Glad you found tumblingjazz useful and cheers for the shout out.

When is the next guide coming out? Interested to read what you were doing with the program

 

[seocrab]

This is the most useful guide I've read on here... thanks a lot for sharing. Looking forward to reading your next one.

 

[jimmyg]

There is some good info in your guide, and I don't mean to say all the information is useless but consider this:

If you are logged into G and you have a cookie and static IP etc, and you go to your bank website and login, and they are using GA, do you think G now has your bank login and password? Of course not, because that information is sent using POST (rather than GET) to a PHP(or ASP or ROR, etc) handler page and G can't see what data is submitted.

In any case, whether it is possible or not, it doesn't happen. The GA code you put on your page is freely available and you can go look at it. There is no code to try and intercept form submission data.

 

[fxphil]

@ RootJazz Hey thanks, My next guide should be out in the next few weeks I just want to make sure I can squeeze as many rank movements out as possible. Props for you software saving me time and making life easy. I'm still toying around with it as it has so many different functions. I have been using it for automating 90% of my tumblr accounts but I also have been trying some new things with it. I will right a full review for it after the guide but as of right now it is A+. WinningIO is working on a bot as well I'd give him the heads up as yours is functional and see if you guys can't collaborate on ingratiating some functions.

@seocrab Thanks, I will have anew guide out soon, be on the look out

@Jimmyg I know your concern about IP information not being able to be transferred unless it's on the submission page but there are other ways you just need to think outside of the box. I personally know of 6 ways of narrowing it down for G to grade IP addresses. One way to narrow it down would be when someone posts a comment it's fairly reasonable to assume that even on a basic level google can see before a comment is posted and after and know that if an IP address is on a page then leaves and then there is all the sudden a comment that the previous visitor did it. Now this only works clearly on auto Approve blogs but it's just to give you an idea on thinking past your own limitations. I have found at least 6 more ways to tag commented IP addresses and they are way more in depth and will be a part of my next guide.

 

[jimmyg]

I will admit it is possible to "guess" that a certain user left a comment. This would work on an AA blog that has very little traffic so that only a single (or very few) people are on the page at a time. And this would mean the G slurp bot would have to grab a copy of the page quite often to analyze the changes and track them to individual posters. I don't believe that G actually is able to currently get this kind of data, but I will admit that what you suggest is technically possible.

 

[lagger]

I will admit it is possible to "guess" that a certain user left a comment. This would work on an AA blog that has very little traffic so that only a single (or very few) people are on the page at a time. And this would mean the G slurp bot would have to grab a copy of the page quite often to analyze the changes and track them to individual posters. I don't believe that G actually is able to currently get this kind of data, but I will admit that what you suggest is technically possible.

I wouldn't dismiss it entirely. Think about how many times google bot hits your site a day?

 

[kristur]

Since you seem extremely knowledgeable fxphil, might I ask you what would be your ideal tier1 platforms?
There's always some new reports about this and that not working anymore, like f.e.
David Naylor's site claiming that Matt Cutts has confirmed article directories are toxic for site health ...

 

[domainmadness]

Great, out of the box, tips. I have similar experiences with my own projects.

One thing I have found out recently is that using nofollow links as good part of your link profile is very beneficial, and actually not having good % of nofollow links might hurt your rankings. Since this was kind of new discovery for me (always been sculpting pagerank), would appreciate if you could share some reasonable sources for quality nofollow links?

Waiting for your next guide!