Making Churn and Burn Websites

[keadams26]

Should I go for multiple reviews on one site or one domain per review?

I would guess multiple reviews on one domain. If you are going to pound the shit out of it, do it on a sub-directory or sub-domain level...

 

[dannyhw]

I have never dealt with "churn and burn" websites but it seems to me like a hamster wheel. Same process over and over again and not really getting anywhere. Sure, you can make money but it doesn't seem that it would be a good long term plan. But, to each his own, I suppose...

It is, and I don't do it anymore, but I've only ever done it when it was 100% autopilot. Like where the income to work ratio ended up being like $10,000/hr. I'd lie if I said I don't still keep my eyes open though.

 

[InvoiceLABs]

If you are churning and burning those websites, just get single hosting for all of them.

Eventhough its churn and burn, I`d still stick with the non-free web hosting just because I hate seeing my website down all the time.

 

[Ninya]

I'd do it properly, get proper hosting and a proper domain, it'll only cost you <$20. Free hosts are shit and their nameservers are spammed of the face of the planet, you're asking for an easy ban.

You can review one product on the homepage and call the website product-review.org or whatever is available. Heck you can call it barbieworld.com and it would still rank if you're going to rank it with spam.

You can then compare it with another product on the page, just to increase your conversions a bit although it's not necessary.

If you're going to do a complete comparison and multiple reviews, you might as well make it an authority site and not churn and burn

 

[xSwag]

I'd do it properly, get proper hosting and a proper domain, it'll only cost you <$20. Free hosts are shit and their nameservers are spammed of the face of the planet, you're asking for an easy ban.

You can review one product on the homepage and call the website product-review.org or whatever is available. Heck you can call it barbieworld.com and it would still rank if you're going to rank it with spam.

You can then compare it with another product on the page, just to increase your conversions a bit although it's not necessary.

If you're going to do a complete comparison and multiple reviews, you might as well make it an authority site and not churn and burn

Good sh*t man. Gonna give this "churn and burn" method a go thanks to your tips.

 

[Ninya]

Good sh*t man. Gonna give this "churn and burn" method a go thanks to your tips.

No problems man, most people steer clear of churn and burn sites because they believe all their effort is gone to waste once the website hits a penalty. But this is just wrong. With a 301 redirect, you'll never face this problem as the link juice is always stationary and can be pointed wherever you want, whenever you want. If you're making $10,000 out of a churn website, you can easily spend that capital on building your authority websites. Not everything needs to be built into an authority.

 

[moose942]

Namecheap + Hostgator will work well for what you're doing right now.

 

[qlithe]

I'd do it properly, get proper hosting and a proper domain, it'll only cost you <$20. Free hosts are shit and their nameservers are spammed of the face of the planet, you're asking for an easy ban.

You can review one product on the homepage and call the website product-review.org or whatever is available. Heck you can call it barbieworld.com and it would still rank if you're going to rank it with spam.

You can then compare it with another product on the page, just to increase your conversions a bit although it's not necessary.

If you're going to do a complete comparison and multiple reviews, you might as well make it an authority site and not churn and burn

What do you mean with spam? Can you rank those sites easily with GSA e.g.?

I was thinking more about sape or similar links

 

[Ninya]

What do you mean with spam? Can you rank those sites easily with GSA e.g.?

I was thinking more about sape or similar links

Sorry I was referring to all links that would normally give you a manual penalty, eg SAPE