So as per your method dynamic parameters are important than main request calls, Two kind of methods are exposed in BHW..so even if work hard on dynamic parameters, if YT patches main request call itself what will happen?Parameters are clearly hard-coded in this script, including fexp, others are generated randomly; this is an obvious "ban me" signal to youtube. The key to making your views as legitimate as possible is to dynamically generate all of these parameters so they become virtually indistinguishable from real views, that's why there are $5 scripts and $5000 scripts, I've been testing all of these methods for a long time, and you're definitely free not to take my word for it; but I can tell you from experience that if you're hardcoding parameters or randomly creating them with random chars, it's just a matter of time before your video is either taken down or at the very least the views would be removed; the fact that they exist now do not mean they will remain so in the future or that youtube is not aware of them. Peace
You'll have to study how they're generated, or scrap them using some js tricks (which is not easy since youtube altered their same-origin policy). I've personally seen and worked on scripts that are near 3K lines of code to do just that.So what's the other method to generate parameters dynamically other than generating them randomly??
Parameters are clearly hard-coded in this script, including fexp, others are generated randomly; this is an obvious "ban me" signal to youtube. The key to making your views as legitimate as possible is to dynamically generate all of these parameters so they become virtually indistinguishable from real views, that's why there are $5 scripts and $5000 scripts, I've been testing all of these methods for a long time, and you're definitely free not to take my word for it; but I can tell you from experience that if you're hardcoding parameters or randomly creating them with random chars, it's just a matter of time before your video is either taken down or at the very least the views would be removed; the fact that they exist now do not mean they will remain so in the future or that youtube is not aware of them. Peace
I know I have seen this before. In one way he's abusing with members, all users that have software in their Desktop I call "victims". On the next update it can do everything.they been doing this for years lol since Simon shared 1st method at lease
I remember 1st time they just put in in front page just need to look it up html source code and you can see method
this time they came up with better idea but still busted
as long as there's no methods in public this guy wouldn't abuse your PC's lol
but if was me I rather spent some $ on traffic then use your own users like a slaves
And where's the price. The price should be public (I can't see they have wrote in all pages into their own offical website)You really thought that there was a free lunch? That there would be some magical serverfarm somewhere fulfilling our requests and running with some magical money? Or there were some man running all this with noprofit?
This is the price that we need to pay to have those views and it is fine as long as there is no other than youtube stuff included in the software.
The ID is autogenerated. This is just one video from some ...Here is video on the embedded script
Thanks. Already reported for double post!i really like u2bviews they work for me
The problem is you 've been doing it without the users knowing it. And you have the nerve to complain when someone exposes your fraud. That 's the same as installing malware on people 's computers.
Had the users known about it, everything would be perfectly fine. When you do it on the side, it 's fraud.
Thank you, not because you "protected" my point, but because you showed what i have been trying to explain above. people in here are acting like they are saints and like im doing something bad to anyone. oh well :/remember we are blackhatters and this is just a small thing.
do you know about any exchange site which do not make money from members ?
people make site to make money not to (except charity ) he is earning from it let him earn & if you not liked it then you have full rights to leave site. (there are many exchange site)
-prab-
Well, then should i say that other networks such as mine are doing the same stuff? and i dont see their name in here?
is this some kinda of topic with intentions to harm my site reputation?!?!?
So, i have a site wich i am the owner, i have unlimited credits, and i need to justify my users that i use those credits for my porpouses and to insert my videos in there?
comon, its my site and i do what its needed to keep it alive as i see it as a business, im not really doing anything bad after all,
you guys are talking about it like its a virus of some sorta,
if you look into other networks (wich im not going to reveal names), they are doing exactly the same and you as yourself would be doing the same , doing profit on a site that belongs to you, since its free after all and the servers need to be paid.
If you're not paying for it, you are the product.
Easy as that. Not sure what all the hassle is about. He's running it free and gets his fair share.