thebossispro
Regular Member
- Jan 12, 2013
- 300
- 63
No ahrefs shows 0 site wide links.
Permanently Closed Marketplace Sales Thread
- Thread starter jimbobo2779
- Start date
- Status
No ahrefs shows 0 site wide links.
penjodenjo
BANNED
- Jul 29, 2012
- 71
- 30
Highly recommended, But before paying you can I get trail version,
Best Regards
Best Regards
- Sep 17, 2008
- 6,037
- 3,974
I would actually be really interested in seeing the profile for this site if you wouldn't mind me taking a look at it. If you could PM me the address of that website I would not pass it on or the niche to anyone nor would I attempt to compete in it, I am just curious why there is such a difference in the link numbers, normally the difference is in th eother direction.
You can get the free 7 day trial directly from the website
I wouldn't really recommend HMA over private proxies as you could only be using 1 IP at a time which would be about as effective as not using proxies at all, obviously the only difference being that you could burn that IP address out and not worry about it. Realistically using HMA isn't going to enable you to run more than 1 searching thread which is the main reason for using private proxies in my book,it could be done but I don't see it offering a great advantage in the searching department which nearly always ends up being the main bottleneck.
thebossispro
Regular Member
- Jan 12, 2013
- 300
- 63
Sent the pm
- Sep 17, 2008
- 6,037
- 3,974
There are plenty of warnings against using the built in proxy harvester because of this very reason and more. There is a warning when you hover over the control and one that pops up whenever the proxy harvester is enabled, this is because if not used correctly it can actually amount of links vs not using proxies at all. You can speed up the whole harvesting and checking by increasing the number of Max threads (not searching threads).
You can also increase the interval between proxy checking sessions, obviously doing this will result in more of the proxies becoming unusable as public proxies are notoriously unreliable and as such the longer between testings the lower your overall link count could be. There is a fine line between checking the proxies often enough and not often enough and that is one of the many reasons using the proxies from the built in proxy harvester is not a great idea and is also why there are warnings against using it unless you know exactly what you are doing.
Without knowing how you are coming to this conclusion I cannot state exactly why you are seeing this or if what you are seeing is a realistic representation of your actual link profile.
All platforms that are stated as D0follow:Yes are set as allowing d0follow links by default and are rarely changed as they often take a lot of effort (more than simply changing a setting or adding a plugin).
One thing I can suggest could be responsible for what you are seeing (assuming it is accurate) is that you may still have the option to "Post to deactivated platforms?" enabled. This option allows to only search for your desired platforms but still post to any supported platform to maximise number of links. While it is possible to limit to just d0follow I would strongly suggest not to do this as a high level of d0follow links is very uncommon for any website and nofollow definitely do provide ranking improvements.
Hello,
https://ahrefs.com/site-explorer/overview/prefix/http%253A%252F%252Fcenter-hack.com%252Fpet-rescue-saga-hack%252F
Check the number of nofollow .....
I have used only nohandseo with my AA list, here is my setting with nohandseo : http://imgur.com/jto2daj
how can i solve this problem ?
https://ahrefs.com/site-explorer/overview/prefix/http%253A%252F%252Fcenter-hack.com%252Fpet-rescue-saga-hack%252F
Check the number of nofollow .....
I have used only nohandseo with my AA list, here is my setting with nohandseo : http://imgur.com/jto2daj
how can i solve this problem ?
I apologize to ask this question because I am almost positive I read it somewhere in one of the threads on NHS but I just can't find it in the many that I have read. How much bandwidth does NHS run without any proxies from internet provider? And if a person runs proxies does that limit the amount of bandwidth NHS uses from internet provider? Thanks and sorry again. I know I read something about this already but at the time I barely even knew what bandwidth was so the info was useless at that time.
- Sep 17, 2008
- 6,037
- 3,974
It appears that the platform responsible for your nofollow links is dotclear, I have changed the d0follow status of this platform to some. When I added this platform it was d0follow by default and all of th eURLs that I tested the platform against were d0follow, it would appear that this has been changed so if you want to increase the number of d0follow links you will want to disable this platform.
No need to apologise, if you are wondering it then chances are someone else is as well. The amount of bandwidth with and without proxies will likely be more or less the same, at least negligible difference between the two.
The amount of bandwidth actually used vares greatly between 1 machine and another as there are a lot of settings that will change the amount of bandwidth used, also the type of profiles you are running with can affect this quite a lot as well so it would be impossible to say. I can say that if you are limited in your bandwidth by 100Gb or less you will likely use a sizable chunk of your bandwidth with NHSEO if you are planning on running 24/7, you could limit this amount somewhat but it will also limit the amount of links you generate daily. There are very few VPS solutions that would have a bandwidth limit that would be used up by NHSEO, virtually all VPS that I have seen have had such high bandwidth limitations that you wouldn't need to worry about this at all.
- Sep 17, 2008
- 6,037
- 3,974
Personally I don't really see the point in using another tool to do for NHSEO exactly what it can do without any user input, for example to build a list in SB you would need to scrape keywords, search for targets, remove dupes, post to the pages, check for current links and then output the list of pages to NHSEO for posting when you could just press start in NHSEO. I am also not sure if SB supports the amount of platforms that NHSEO does, I would be surprised if it did but I don't use it so I cannot say for definite.
You could also, as an alternative, simply do the keyword\target harvesting in SB and then output the targets to a file and import them to NHSEO. Lots of people will think that this will garner a lot more linking opportunities as the number of targets seems higher when done like this, however doing this bypasses the post once per domain checking that NHSEO does to ensure that you are only getting links from unique domains rather than posting over and over to the same domain. If you do not intend to use the only post once per domain option then this is fine and could be quicker in some circumstances but definitely will take a lot more time and effort to do.
Personally I would rather just add my profiles in to NHSEO and let it handle all of these jobs for me.
- Sep 17, 2008
- 6,037
- 3,974
I don't have a particular keyword list that I use, I just use whatever is appropriate (relevant) at the time or sometimes I don't even go for relevancy, just whatever I think will result in lots of targets.
Well I don't really know how you would compare a service that costs a minimum of $15 per month and limits how many links can be indexed to a one off payment tool that can indexed as many pages as you like. I never really understood why some services charge such a premium when all they are intended for is indexing links.
I plan on adding a lot more platforms, there are just a few things that need to be in place first. I would never want to add more platforms if it meant it would make the tool harder to setup or use.
- Sep 17, 2008
- 6,037
- 3,974
To be honest I haven't seen this happen (I add a lot of profiles when testing) ad haven't heard of it happening to anyone else since it was fixed many updates back. What version are you using?
There is no point. Some links may get accepted initially but after a few they all get taken down anyway, it just lessens the amount of wasted time attempting to post to them. You can emove them from th elist if you wish to attempt to post to them, it will not cause any particularly unexpected things to happen.
@jimbobo2779
One idea for you, with NHS, Indexer and Pinger, you can offer SERP tracker.
Last 20 days I test NHS with 4 new sites. Brand new domains, with WP and content. I create profile for every domain at NHS, with over 200 anchors per domain, software search for pages with max 100 OBL, private proxies, Death By Captcha, Indexer etc. I can see indexed links at Ahrefs and Majestic for every domain but still there is no rankings. Can you tell me how much I must wait for first results?
One idea for you, with NHS, Indexer and Pinger, you can offer SERP tracker.
Last 20 days I test NHS with 4 new sites. Brand new domains, with WP and content. I create profile for every domain at NHS, with over 200 anchors per domain, software search for pages with max 100 OBL, private proxies, Death By Captcha, Indexer etc. I can see indexed links at Ahrefs and Majestic for every domain but still there is no rankings. Can you tell me how much I must wait for first results?
- Status