no follow links

[ashee1]

I want to know something about linkbuilding.
When i making relevant blog comments link.then mostly blogs are nofollow, its hard to get relevant do follow blog comments.
I heard that nofollow linkbuilding is also have importance in improve SERP.
Can you people please explain how ******** effective. and how no follow effective for site.

 

[imdaily]

They both help your PR, but nofollow is much less potent than ********. You should really focus on ******** links while blog/forum/etc. commenting if you can.

 

[imdaily]

all those *** above say "do-follow" - FYI

 

[SEEmarket]

any one who can PM me with the Hight PR quality backlinks sale related to shopping site!
thanks

 

[m2bsolutions]

No follow links are those which do not pass link juice to the another pages.

 

[serpwizard]

no follow links are those which don't pass link juice to the another website.

 

[MorganX]

Would prefer No follow links are less effective when compared to do follow links....!

 

[SuiteTieLies]

Its really about a balance to look "natural" whatever the hell that really means. If you made the program "G" you would want both right?

 

[ashee1]

Its really about a balance to look "natural" whatever the hell that really means. If you made the program "G" you would want both right?

what you want to say i dont know...i am initial stages on seo and its everyone's right to ask whatever he want....what you are saying just explain it.

 

[CredibleZephyre]

Short story: No-follow links don't pass link juice but it's still not a bad idea to have some.

Long story: No-follow links don't pass link juice but that doesn't necessarily mean crawlers don't use them to jump sites. They just don't pass any link juice. When doing blog comments with no follow links just think more of the people who will think to themselves "hmm thats a thoughtful comment from a person who obviously knows a lot about this topic. Maybe if I go to their website I'll learn more" and you can still get traffic through it.

It also helps because Google wants you to have a natural link profile. There is no set ratio for no-follow/do-follow (at least not one I'm aware of). If you're site has 1 million PR 7 links (not likely but bear with me) and 0 no follow links Google thinks to itself "yeah right... this person definitely bought all those links cause that can't be real". and you get punished. so if you have all types of links in there Google figures it looks "natural" and you're better off.

 

[Bokva]

You need nofollow links also, to not raise a red flag in google, because it will be suspicious to have only do-follow links. It would mean that you are posting comments to blogs just to recieve link juice.

all those *** above say "do-follow" - FYI

Every *** word I read like "sh*t" or "f*ck" till you explained.

 

[seosoldier]

A mixture of No-Follow, Do-Follow, High PR, Low PR links help in Rankings as well as PR.

 

[gullsinn]

Both are effective mate, Mixture is good.

 

[accelerator_dd]

No follow aren't as effective in actual ranks, but they do help keep google penalties away by making your backlink portfolio look more natural. No site online will naturally get only ******** backlinks.

 

[Mr.Julyan]

Never underestimate the power of natural link building. With no follow link, your website will at least safe from suspicions. You can get no follow links from forum signature such as DP, and of course many other ways. The most important links is of course do follow, because it's juicy.

 

[DarkMatrix]

In my experience, nofollows do not help influence rankings but can make a site's backlinks look more natural. I personally wouldn't pay for or spend a lot of time trying to get nofollows unless there was decent about of referral traffic to gain from the link.