The most irritating thing about EzineArticles

[turdface]

When you get this message:

How about you just tell me what the issue is so I don't have to email you and then wait a few days for a reply? Like 95% of the time an article gets rejected, they're just like "here's the problem" (even though sometimes it's BS) and you can usually figure out what is wrong. But the other 5% of the time they're like "there's a problem but we're not going to tell you what it is unless you email us." Seems like a slow way to do things. Can you imagine if you took your car to the mechanic and after he looked at your car, he said "well, there's something wrong with your car but I'm not going to tell you what it is unless you email me and ask"?

 

[Neo240]

Seems to me that they are working to find a problem with your submission. You should be patient.

Jokes aside do you get approved after you email them? Or the result is still same.

 

[turdface]

Seems to me that they are working to find a problem with your submission. You should be patient.

Jokes aside do you get approved after you email them? Or the result is still same.

Eventually I get them accepted unless it's some reason like a banned topic or something. Usually I have to make a few changes to the articles. I just don't like it when they do it this way because it's slow. I like it when they tell you what the reason is in the email.

 

[BlackHat3]

Do you post there for the backlink or the traffic? Just curious.

 

[dennica]

on my end, i usually used ezine for a tier1 link..
i havent meet that problem so far..

is your ez account new?

 

[littlemonk]

Did you post behind proxy/vpn?

 

[zebrahat]

I just avoid ezinearticles these days. The weight of directories are devalued by Google, other high PR article sites don't put you through this hassle, and still others even pay you a share of the Adsense money. So why are we bothering with no-information notifications about alleged problems? Why are we providing free inventory not just in the way of content, but in editing time, to a site that lacks an intuitive process for handling it?

 

[BrianKade001]

I just avoid ezinearticles these days. The weight of directories are devalued by Google, other high PR article sites don't put you through this hassle, and still others even pay you a share of the Adsense money. So why are we bothering with no-information notifications about alleged problems? Why are we providing free inventory not just in the way of content, but in editing time, to a site that lacks an intuitive process for handling it?

Yeah. You're right. Ezinearticles suck nowadays. It must be strictly avoided.

 

[Julzwriter]

I think submitting to Ezine is still ok
if you are looking for backlinks, I don't
think it is totally devalued.

 

[shanna_doll]

I just avoid ezinearticles these days. The weight of directories are devalued by Google, other high PR article sites don't put you through this hassle, and still others even pay you a share of the Adsense money. So why are we bothering with no-information notifications about alleged problems? Why are we providing free inventory not just in the way of content, but in editing time, to a site that lacks an intuitive process for handling it?

True, like Google doesn't know that site is in 99% cases used by marketers who are just looking to promote something.