Iran wants to destroy Google

Misleading news title' + proud americans = anger -> which leads to war

so welcome to the paradise

Iran don't want to destroy Google, they just banned it because Google renamed the Persian gulf. It was a political step from G but who cares about it! The situation is some ppl from the dark-side want to spare false and misleading news anyhow the question is:

Dear citizens of the United States, are you ready to the next war?

It's all about the fckin money, everyone wants to be chamillionaire in no time so ... go ahead, don't think just make war.

Thats what our lives about, killing eachother. It makes sense, HELLYA!
 
Misleading news title' + proud americans = anger -> which leads to war

so welcome to the paradise

Iran don't want to destroy Google, they just banned it because Google renamed the Persian gulf. It was a political step from G but who cares about it! The situation is some ppl from the dark-side want to spare false and misleading news anyhow the question is:



It's all about the fckin money, everyone wants to be chamillionaire in no time so ... go ahead, don't think just make war.

Thats what our lives about, killing eachother. It makes sense, HELLYA!

d5p2t
 
That's just asking for it. If I were Google I'd delete Iran off the map altogether
for making threats or rename it The Free Peoples Republic of Google.
A bit of photoshop on Google Earth showing naked alcohol fueled parties taking
place in the presidential palaces.
 
Last edited:
They soon will be disconnected from the rest of the internet, lol
 
It's amazing people's ignorance about Iran, why not read how the UK + USA removed their democratically elected leader in the 50's for oil and replaced him with a dictator (Shah) who tortured his people, the people rose up and kicked him out and the Islamists filled the political vacuum, still not done, the USA sponsored Saddam Hussain to attack the Iranians who have not launched a war of aggression for hundreds of years, they are paranoid there for a reason...forget it, just keep watching Fox news.
 

Bing rankings go hand in hand with Yahoo rankings. Seems like they have the same source. Anyways, it will be great to dominate 2 engines now. !! Ready to find some Iranian clients for bing/yahoo optimization....
 
lol I'd like to see a thumb war face off between Matt Cutts vs. Akminahksafkvdsfasasdlkjad :cool:
 
Sounds good to me. I'm getting sick of G and the Bullshit Man.
 
It's amazing people's ignorance about Iran, why not read how the UK + USA removed their democratically elected leader in the 50's for oil and replaced him with a dictator (Shah) who tortured his people, the people rose up and kicked him out and the Islamists filled the political vacuum, still not done, the USA sponsored Saddam Hussain to attack the Iranians who have not launched a war of aggression for hundreds of years, they are paranoid there for a reason...forget it, just keep watching Fox news.

/agree
 
It's amazing people's ignorance about Iran, why not read how the UK + USA removed their democratically elected leader in the 50's for oil and replaced him with a dictator (Shah) who tortured his people, the people rose up and kicked him out and the Islamists filled the political vacuum, still not done, the USA sponsored Saddam Hussain to attack the Iranians who have not launched a war of aggression for hundreds of years, they are paranoid there for a reason...forget it, just keep watching Fox news.



Isnt that the truth! Seems you are a little History Challenged too.

But in the interest of accuracy, Rezā Shāh Pahlavi took power in 1925 by overthrowing Ahmad Shah Qajar, the last Shah of the Qajar dynasty (apparently this is OK because he did it the Persian way by killing his opponents). He was the father of Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, whom everyone calls the Shah of Iran.

There was no democratically elected Iranian in power to depose. All the US/UK did is cause the elder to abdicate for his SON to take over be in power. This is in alignment with 2500 years of Persian history, where if you wanted power, you simply took it and killed everyone who you even suspected might stand against you, called yourself a dynasty and handed down Iran to your son. As long as the sons could from being killed the dynasty existed.

The real problem is that once they were one of the greatest powers in the world, and they never got over having their ass handed to them by a force of free men 1/10 their size at Plataea.

By the way attacking and sacking and imprisoning the staff of an Embasy IS launching a war of aggression.

Iran was just lucky that Jimmy Carter was President, Democrats never defend anyone but democrats. Historians among you will know why and when those hostages were released.
 
Last edited:
The ingnorance of some of the people here is unforgivable! you would think that people IQ's on BHW would be above average! But I guess not......
 
I love how people who make their living off of google like to bash google so much on this forum. Personally, I don't make my living off of google, so screw 'em! Haha, but seriously, this is pretty insignificant.
 
Looks like most of you here are against Google. New war huh? I'm gonna wait and see what will they do to Google.
 
It's amazing people's ignorance about Iran, why not read how the UK + USA removed their democratically elected leader in the 50's for oil and replaced him with a dictator (Shah) who tortured his people, the people rose up and kicked him out and the Islamists filled the political vacuum, still not done, the USA sponsored Saddam Hussain to attack the Iranians who have not launched a war of aggression for hundreds of years, they are paranoid there for a reason...forget it, just keep watching Fox news.
Nothing's amazing about it.... Most people especially westerners and their grandfathers are thought and probably brainwashed (indirectly may be) to hate Iran (and few other countries) for obvious reason which I don't want to talk about even though Iran is a peaceful country and NEVER harmed any country. Those people are probably waiting (or try to initiate) for Iran to do something that can justify their "next" action.
 
Isnt that the truth! Seems you are a little History Challenged too.

But in the interest of accuracy, Rezā Shāh Pahlavi took power in 1925 by overthrowing Ahmad Shah Qajar, the last Shah of the Qajar dynasty (apparently this is OK because he did it the Persian way by killing his opponents). He was the father of Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, whom everyone calls the Shah of Iran.

There was no democratically elected Iranian in power to depose. All the US/UK did is cause the elder to abdicate for his SON to take over be in power. This is in alignment with 2500 years of Persian history, where if you wanted power, you simply took it and killed everyone who you even suspected might stand against you, called yourself a dynasty and handed down Iran to your son. As long as the sons could from being killed the dynasty existed.

The real problem is that once they were one of the greatest powers in the world, and they never got over having their ass handed to them by a force of free men 1/10 their size at Plataea.

By the way attacking and sacking and imprisoning the staff of an Embasy IS launching a war of aggression.

Iran was just lucky that Jimmy Carter was President, Democrats never defend anyone but democrats. Historians among you will know why and when those hostages were released.

Was that from a Fox documentary?

You seem to miss the difference to internal political struggle and a CIA backed coup, Mosaddegh was elected (more democratically than GWB) and the embassy staff were accused of plotting another coup (which they probably were) yeah lucky JC was president coz GWB would have caused WW3.
 
Nothing's amazing about it.... Most people especially westerners and their grandfathers are thought and probably brainwashed (indirectly may be) to hate Iran (and few other countries) for obvious reason which I don't want to talk about even though Iran is a peaceful country and NEVER harmed any country. Those people are probably waiting (or try to initiate) for Iran to do something that can justify their "next" action.

The problem with your brainwashing argument, is - guess what? Exactly! The brainwashing argument!
How do you know you're not the one who was brainwashed?
 
Back
Top