Guide to past-Penguin safe backlink building.

[rfqmaster]

YES, great info! Thanks for sharing, think this is going to be my starting point since I'm just beginning my IM journey.

 

[webmasterbd]

Thanks Extrawinner for such an insightful guide! I would also like to say one thing to the people who are saying its high time to ditch IM & making people confused.Guys this is not the first time Google tried to dry our online income source with BS updates & this sure ain't gonna be the first time we fought against those updates & came back in top again.No matter how flawless Google thinks they are,there always be some flaws on there algorithm & there will be people like us who will find it & make the full use of it .So stop whining & start cracking

 

[brok3n]

Here is my new method for penguin, I own the private networks, and will now be building private network web 2.0

View attachment 11335

rinse and Repeat

do you do this once a day?

 

[Double D]

It was a lot of info to take in but his was a very detailed post, thank you!

So it seems like the game is changing very rapidly...wth is going to be next...ugh

 

[romson]

Hey, ExtraWinner, thanks for the good post. In this picture do you use exact anchor text as main keyword?

 

[.:mAestro:.]

and will now be building private network web 2.0

Can you please explain how exactly are you planning to do this?

 

[wowhaxor]

Great tips, and thanks for the mention as well

 

[ExtraWinner]

I am having same issue. I am starting to think that its better to build another site than to try and come back from bad links. My reason is they say to get rid of bad links, but if you have no control over those links you can not get rid of them. If you cant get rid of them how are you going to bounce back? So I took the loss and am starting to rank duplicate sites of my money makers.

I will create a guide to protecting yourself against negative SEO tomorrow. Its bit difficult, but very doable.

thanks - the new penguin update forces us to be all more careful

And more creative.

Great info

Thanks Extrawinner for such an insightful guide! I would also like to say one thing to the people who are saying its high time to ditch IM & making people confused.Guys this is not the first time Google tried to dry our online income source with BS updates & this sure ain't gonna be the first time we fought against those updates & came back in top again.No matter how flawless Google thinks they are,there always be some flaws on there algorithm & there will be people like us who will find it & make the full use of it .So stop whining & start cracking

Well said

It was a lot of info to take in but his was a very detailed post, thank you!

So it seems like the game is changing very rapidly...wth is going to be next...ugh

Yeah, every 6 months Google is changing battlefield - but we will be there, no matter what

Great tips, and thanks for the mention as well

No worries. Hope you got my security related PM few days ago.




I am finishing my thread on protecting sites against negative SEO. I will post it today later on.

Also I got a interesting message - "What if you cannot afford unique web 2.0s?"
Well simply copy all articles - as they are (no spinning) to other web 2.0 properties and add source link. So all web 2.0 will link to your site and main web 2.0 property. This way you are safe against manual review!

 

[fxdarling]

Great post and very useful discussion. thank you for all. As for me, I don't think that everyone must do the same. You can take these methods and ideas for your consideration and push your sites they way you think will work best. But of course the general rules stay the same.

 

[tybrenis]

Awesome advice, thanks for the detailed write-up!

 

[bigwhite]

Awesome information here. One of the most informative posts I've seen lately.

 

[Windmill]

+ Thanks given for the first method. That is a fantastic idea, I will have to trial that!

 

[TopLinkWheeler]

Very useful info, thanks!

 

[dichotomy]

Great post, when you're hiring your 'noob' how do you address anchor text?

 

[zerofoxtrot]

Tier 2 wikis and stuff should be linking to Tier 1 links or directly to the monetization website?

 

[ExtraWinner]

Great post, when you're hiring your 'noob' how do you address anchor text?

I dont - I just tell them what are my 2-3 keywords and if website asks for keyword - they should submit it.
I dont want them to build anchors really - I prefer for them to build authority and possibly cover my GH SEO methods.

Tier 2 wikis and stuff should be linking to Tier 1 links or directly to the monetization website?

Yeah, thats how I do this - you can funnel SEO juice pretty nicely this way.
Many people will link directly to their website but this guide is for risk free SEO - and any huge submission with your websites link can cause problems in future.

Sorry all for slow replies - I will actually open the new promised thread about removing penguin/ranking fast within day or two. Last few days have been crazy because of testing new methods. I will be releasing some nice free bots soon - maybe in week or two first bot will be released for free to all.

 

[The SEO]

Superb..Really helpful for me regarding to link-buiding

 

[dannyvriens]

WooooW I need to safe this toppic.
This is so much better then what most WSO's offer.

+rep given man you earns it.

 

[zerofoxtrot]

Do you mean with profile backlinks like .edu forum profile signatures? Sorry I'm a big noob

 

[VinBed]

Not bad - I especially like the strategy of hiring the ignorant college student off craigslist to build random links. When you have an algorithm seeking out sites with predictable backlink growth, it's only natural that it becomes more suspicious when you leave a footprint.

There has to be a service out there in the BST that provides a footprint-less backlinking service. It would be nice to save time and do a one stop shop.