BlackHades
Newbie
- Mar 3, 2012
- 41
- 13
My honest review. Here are my results:
KW1 #13 to #11 today
KW2 #12 to #9 today
KW3 #37 to #10 today
Very impressed with the position increase of KW3. Decent more modest improvements in the other two keywords.
Here's the PR of the links I received:
1 PR7, 1 PR6, 0 PR5, 5 PR4, 13 PR3, 7 PR2, 4 PR1.
I did get the PR7 and PR6 that was promised. This is the most important so that's a good job there.
For some reason, my main keyword KW1 was hardly used in anchor texts. Only 5 of the 31 links used KW1. This is by far my most important keyword so it was disappointing that it had the least amount of focus. The overwhelming majority of links, 2 out of 3 including the PR7, used KW3 which explains the big jump for KW3 but this is my least important KW. Not sure why KW3 was so heavily concentrated.
Still overall I'm happy. Mainly due to the big jump in KW3. I just wish more focus could have been put into KW1 and less into KW3. There could be better balance with the 3 keywords.
KW1 #13 to #11 today
KW2 #12 to #9 today
KW3 #37 to #10 today
Very impressed with the position increase of KW3. Decent more modest improvements in the other two keywords.
Here's the PR of the links I received:
1 PR7, 1 PR6, 0 PR5, 5 PR4, 13 PR3, 7 PR2, 4 PR1.
I did get the PR7 and PR6 that was promised. This is the most important so that's a good job there.
For some reason, my main keyword KW1 was hardly used in anchor texts. Only 5 of the 31 links used KW1. This is by far my most important keyword so it was disappointing that it had the least amount of focus. The overwhelming majority of links, 2 out of 3 including the PR7, used KW3 which explains the big jump for KW3 but this is my least important KW. Not sure why KW3 was so heavily concentrated.
Still overall I'm happy. Mainly due to the big jump in KW3. I just wish more focus could have been put into KW1 and less into KW3. There could be better balance with the 3 keywords.
Last edited: