Did Massive Backlinking "Kill" Your Site?
- Thread starter KeyzDT
- Start date
DutchTrafficService
Regular Member
- Aug 12, 2010
- 473
- 235
Wrong.
The algorithm is a joke, and will forever be a joke untill we have cpus from outerspace.
- Aug 9, 2010
- 1,641
- 462
lol bro you don't even need an algorithm to see a site with 40,000+ backlinks on alexa that cant even get a traffic rank because the numbers are too low doesnt make sense.
natural backlinking is TOUGH to achieve. getting a real quality high PR backlink is like trying to get a sale lol. people dont get this and just try to find a loophole in an algorithm. hahaha.
DutchTrafficService
Regular Member
- Aug 12, 2010
- 473
- 235
As long as i can rank content like this:
"shey hello yes what nueh erf4 374 get a fit body around ys sure buy for 9.99 now! ok right lol heuhiii '''''' eeju zig get a fit body oklol laters"
I wouldn't bother thinking to hard...
If you think google is smart, you have no idea what you are doing.
"shey hello yes what nueh erf4 374 get a fit body around ys sure buy for 9.99 now! ok right lol heuhiii '''''' eeju zig get a fit body oklol laters"
I wouldn't bother thinking to hard...
If you think google is smart, you have no idea what you are doing.
- Mar 10, 2010
- 42,697
- 107,138
Massive backlinking has my sites sitting on page 1 of google for thousands of KWs.
- Aug 9, 2010
- 1,641
- 462
google is not fast. but that makes it seems dumb. eventually it catches people. maybe not everyone because there is just too much out there but if you leave obvious tracks you are only increasing your chances. eventually real people can get involved too.
monsterguts
Registered Member
- Jul 8, 2011
- 60
- 6
So don't use their analytics and essentially hand everything over for some free reporting.
DutchTrafficService
Regular Member
- Aug 12, 2010
- 473
- 235
If needed i can create 1000 websites with bogus content like that in 1 day, i wish their manual reviewers good luck.
- Aug 9, 2010
- 1,641
- 462
your link pushing technique? I looked over it and that doesnt come across as "massive backlinking" Do you use scrapebox for any of that? lol
- Aug 9, 2010
- 1,641
- 462
- Aug 9, 2010
- 1,641
- 462
awtprod
Junior Member
- Apr 2, 2011
- 155
- 117
thats for sure but tough.. its a great tool
Use piwik, it's just as good, if not better.
- Mar 10, 2010
- 42,697
- 107,138
I'd never use SB to a site unless it was aged, had a lot of content on it and was backlinked in a very healthy manner.
sixalarm
Regular Member
- Aug 21, 2011
- 245
- 102
Massive backlinking is effective, but it just depends on how smart you deploy those backlinks. 10^99 backlinks in 24 hours all pointing to your brand spanking new site, taken from any site you can get a link on, pinged and delivered to google on a silver platter....yeah...thats gonna look fishy to any algorithm. But, if you are smart about it, then massive backlinks=massive traffic=massive $$$.
Really, until we are to the point of large scale quantum computing, I don't think the system is gonna change too much as a whole. Search engines will tweak algorithms to try and stop us BHers and us BHers will find a way to exploit the newly modified algorithm. In other words, I think we still have years of this ever so fun game of cat and mouse.
Just my .02.
Really, until we are to the point of large scale quantum computing, I don't think the system is gonna change too much as a whole. Search engines will tweak algorithms to try and stop us BHers and us BHers will find a way to exploit the newly modified algorithm. In other words, I think we still have years of this ever so fun game of cat and mouse.
Just my .02.
Last edited:
Kickflip
BANNED
- Jan 29, 2010
- 2,038
- 2,489
Which came first? The traffic or the links? How can you get lots of traffic, if nobody ever links to your site? I highly doubt visitors per day/month/year vs. quantity of links is part of Googles algorithm. There are tons of legitimate reasons to have a lots of links and no visitors.
I DO use scrapebox to blast my site directly.
I do it all the time, ever since 1 month after registering my site.
I do have more backlinks than visitors per year.
My content is also very thin, and Scrapebox accounts for 98% of my links.
- Aug 9, 2010
- 1,641
- 462
WAAAAAAy more traffic sources than links....
why are "natural backlinks" called that? BECAUSE THEY CAME FIRST IN THE DAYS BEFORE TOOLS LIKE SCRAPEBOX.
TRUST ME IT IS. I gained #1 spots for medium-high comp keywords with NO BACKLINKS in a very short time because of real traffic.
of course I'm not saying that is a neccesity but its a POSITIVE in google algo.
I would NEVER massive backlink before I got even just a little bit of traffic. 50-100 hits a day. Did this in the past with terrible results.
- Aug 9, 2010
- 1,641
- 462
So wait....you DON'T massive backlink on sites without traffic? It sounds like an aged site with tons of content and backlinked properly already would be a prime canidate to at least get SOME traffic in time, no? I mean that's the basic formula right there lol.
how would you massive backlink without a tool like scrapebox? I dont think were talking about the same thing.
