Anonymous attacking Sony for supporting SOPA

[jazzc]

What do they achieve by stealing the info of people that just want to play some video games?

Feed the friendly troll in various unnamed forums?

 

[Kickflip]

So, in the same logic, because I won't personally be hurt by kid labor, I should advocate the exploitation of children in third world countries? I should not speak out against it?

Yes! That is exactly the same! Brilliant reply!

Child labor is not necessarily a negative thing. Exploitation isn't necessarily a negative thing. I wouldn't generally speak out against Child labor, because there are too many variables involved that I know NOTHING about, and I am sure you know nothing about it in detail either. So in that sense, it IS somewhat similar to SOPA.

If children were not allowed to work in third world countries, I am sure many of them would starve to death. In some 3rd world countries, a 10 year kid is probably a lot more physically capable of earning income to purchase food for his family, then a 50 year old man is. Why would you speak out against allowing a capable person from making money to feed their family?

So yes, please do NOT speak out against child labor without doing some more research on the subject.

Now that we have that figured out, do you want to pull your sarcastic head out of your ass and tell us all why we should oppose SOPA?

 

[Roparadise]

If Anonymous really wants to bring attention to this and get people on their side. Then they can't be bringing down PSN,which pisses people off. They should be organizing protests to bring more attention.

 

[heiska]

Yes! That is exactly the same! Brilliant reply!

Child labor is not necessarily a negative thing. Exploitation isn't necessarily a negative thing. I wouldn't generally speak out against Child labor, because there are too many variables involved that I know NOTHING about, and I am sure you know nothing about it in detail either. So in that sense, it IS somewhat similar to SOPA.

If children were not allowed to work in third world countries, I am sure many of them would starve to death. In some 3rd world countries, a 10 year kid is probably a lot more physically capable of earning income to purchase food for his family, then a 50 year old man is. Why would you speak out against allowing a capable person from making money to feed their family?

So yes, please do NOT speak out against child labor without doing some more research on the subject.

Now that we have that figured out, do you want to pull your sarcastic head out of your ass and tell us all why we should oppose SOPA?

Lol what the fuck. You are just trolling, right?

 

[jazzc]

Lol what the fuck. You are just trolling, right?

I 'm pretty sure he truly supports children labor.

If I 'm not mistaken, he lives in a third world country, so I 'm guessing he has a first hand experience on the subject.

Way to go Kickflip

 

[Kickflip]

I 'm pretty sure he truly supports children labor.

I absolutely do. I live in a 1st world country, and I have had to know several children who lied about their age to get a job, because their parents were too irresponsible to afford groceries to feed them, so they needed to secretly work to buy food for themselves. I don't understand why ANYONE would have an issue with a child who wants to work to support his family.

If you make it illegal for children under a certain age to be employed, then many of them have no choice but to turn to illegal industries, such as manufacturing or selling drugs, and prostitution, theft, or simple begging. People require money to live, to afford food and shelter. If you deny them the right to take on legitimate employment, then you give them no choice.

I don't know about you, but given the choice between starving to death, prostitution or making shoes... My choice is obvious.

Now, about that SOPA. Do you want to state your opinion, or continue to post thick headed replies that make you look like a fool?

 

[jazzc]

I absolutely do.

I knew you would, it fits your projected character

I live in a 1st world country

My apologies for my wrong statement. I thought that I had read in one of your posts that you lived in a 3rd world country.

I don't understand why ANYONE would have an issue with a child who wants to work to support his family.

Ask them...

 

[jazzc]

I wish my parents teached me how to handle a hammer, I always hit on my finger nowadays. Which is a huge disaster when you have to use a keyboard frequently.

That, plus not to mention the fact that you got deprived of getting the chance to support your family as a kid

 

[Kickflip]

Yeah totally agree, same like with prostitution, if they weren't there I had to rape innocent passants

Article 23.

(1) Everyone has the right to work, to free choice of employment, to just and favourable conditions of work and to protection against unemployment.
(2) Everyone, without any discrimination, has the right to equal pay for equal work.
(3) Everyone who works has the right to just and favourable remuneration ensuring for himself and his family an existence worthy of human dignity, and supplemented, if necessary, by other means of social protection.

I don't see any mention of Sexual Intercourse for pleasure as something that should be considered a basic human right.

 

[Spawn]

please done hack sony, we have a need for speed tournament coming up

 

[jazzc]

Since you enjoy quoting Kickflip, here 's some more...

United Nations / Convention on the Rights of the Child / article 32

...States Parties recognize the right of the child to be protected from economic exploitation and from performing any work that is likely to be hazardous or to interfere with the child's education, or to be harmful to the child's health or physical, mental, spiritual, moral or social development.

 

[hellohellosharp]

BAM! AND SUDDENLY THE SUPPORT FOR SOPA GOES AWAY. KUDO'S ANONYMOUS

http://www.businessinsider.com/the-largest-game-companies-in-the-world-have-dropped-their-support-for-a-bill-the-internet-hates-2011-12

 

[roamer]

The sole purpose of Corporations is profit. They have no feelings, just purpose. That's the way capitalism works. The ultimate goal of any corporation is to reach the top, and make sure that A) They Stay there and B) No competitors get there.

You cannot ask for corporations to change their purpose, or to have morals or feelings, or to tame their hunger. They only see opportunities and risks. What you can do is demand that your government regulates them so they don't reach their ultimate goal. Regulation and administration are government's tasks. Corporations acquiring too much power aren't to blame, it only means they weren't properly regulated and thus were able to reach the goals they're created to pursue. You can also vote with your wallet and by creating awareness, thus making the risks too high, both in terms of image and in loss of profits. These are the variables they care about.

Tl;dr: It's only logical for corporations to seek whatever helps them make more profit. Just let them know they won't get it if they follow that particular route, and they shall recant (Hello, GoDaddy?).

 

[Kickflip]

I knew you would, it fits your projected character

My apologies for my wrong statement. I thought that I had read in one of your posts that you lived in a 3rd world country.

My god man, are you really that thick headed and ignorant? Do you even understand the reasoning behind opposing child labor? The issue is that people would like to see the parents of these children working, and the children having the opportunity to go to school and get an education. Of course, that seems ideal. But what if school is not available, and the childs parents are not physically capable of work? What if the only way a child can live with their family, and feed their family is to work?

I would like you to watch this video. This is a man who never received a proper education. He was working manual labor since age of 7. His parents couldn't afford food lots of the time. He has since grown up to be a very productive member of society and though his lack of education will limit what he can achieve, he will be able to live a life full of much happiness, simply because he survived.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qXdSuZPj46Q

Now, I want you to understand that if there if a child serves no purpose, doesn't provide anything, then it gives no incentive for adults to feed, clothe and shelter them. They are left to die. So, would you rather see more children NOT ALLOWED to work, and left to starve or forced into a life of prostitution and drugs? Or children LEGALLY making money doing manual labor? Because school just ISN'T an option for many children in the world.

 

[shaddelick]

I don't see any mention of Sexual Intercourse for pleasure as something that should be considered a basic human right.

If your for human rights, why do you support child labor?

I ask this because if someone supports child labor, they most definitely would support prostitution if it puts food on the table...

 

[jazzc]

But what if school is not available, and the childs parents are not physically capable of work? What if the only way a child can live with their family, and feed their family is to work?

So, you are very confident that the kids in those 6+ sized families in 3rd world countries are the only ones capable of work... :snowwave:

Lets follow your lead and send them to break stones since there 's no school near by. :AR15firin

Now, I want you to understand that if there if a child serves no purpose, doesn't provide anything, then it gives no incentive for adults to feed, clothe and shelter them. They are left to die.

So, not only do the kids deserve breaking stones, but their parents are also bloodsucking animals that have no love for them?

 

[Kickflip]

Since you enjoy quoting Kickflip, here 's some more...

United Nations / Convention on the Rights of the Child / article 32

Why even post that? Nowhere did I say I WANT children to be FORCED into labor. But I would like the RIGHT for children to seek legal employment, when school is not an option. If a child has to choose between working in a factory, or starving to death, you want them to starve to death. Simple as that.

 

[jazzc]

If your for human rights, why do you support child labor?

Obviously, he does not consider kids eligible of human rights if there are no schools built near by...:hmmmm:

 

[Kickflip]

If your for human rights, why do you support child labor?

Because some people will starve to death or have to sell their bodies as prostitutes if they are not allowed to legally seek employment. Simple.

 

[jazzc]

Why even post that? Nowhere did I say I WANT children to be FORCED into labor. But I would like the RIGHT for children to seek legal employment, when school is not an option.

Making it legal means that lots and lots and lots more WILL be forced by others.

If you can't see that plain truth, I rest my case.