Looking for Beta Testers for AAC Trackback Submitter

I'm not sure. For a person new to it - probably it doesn't make much difference (although nested spintax is not that simple); for current SB users it's a big issue as they would have to convert all their files to your format, something to keep in mind. E.g. I have well over 300 websites - if you include subpages that's a lot of links!

okay...will keep in mind...try to make a scrapebox format load...
 
Maybe I should watch your video :D

I usually try first and watch later, no different this time...

You might be right with separating the excerpts and titles - I've had a few mishaps that look quite horrible. Creating some sort of conversion helper app would definitely be a plus for all the SB users.
 
ok now i was running it with around a 30k list. it started promising , faster than SB and now I thought it should be thgrough and when I check it crashed as well.

Problem signature:
Problem Event Name: CLR20r3
Problem Signature 01: aac trackback submitter.exe
Problem Signature 02: 1.0.0.0
Problem Signature 03: 4ed100fd
Problem Signature 04: AAC Trackback Submitter
Problem Signature 05: 1.0.0.0
Problem Signature 06: 4ed100fd
Problem Signature 07: 1fd
Problem Signature 08: 7
Problem Signature 09: System.NullReferenceException
OS Version: 6.1.7601.2.1.0.768.3
Locale ID: 1033
Additional Information 1: 0a9e
Additional Information 2: 0a9e372d3b4ad19135b953a78882e789
Additional Information 3: 0a9e
Additional Information 4: 0a9e372d3b4ad19135b953a78882e789
 
of course now thats an issue since after using the list I cant run it again with the same URL and dont have alist of the posted ones since it crashed. maybe a temp file would help
 
Maybe I should watch your video :D

I usually try first and watch later, no different this time...

You might be right with separating the excerpts and titles - I've had a few mishaps that look quite horrible. Creating some sort of conversion helper app would definitely be a plus for all the SB users.

good solution....will work on that...think its better than this wired scrapebox format....
 
I would love to see what you have there.need another

Dizz
 
of course now thats an issue since after using the list I cant run it again with the same URL and dont have alist of the posted ones since it crashed. maybe a temp file would help

you can use the list, it will skip the success posted with a message like "we already have a ping from that url"
 
well but of course it would great if we had a log to not run the 30k list again etc..
not sure why it crashed on the list though. worked with small one before. i think it was on around 20k and then sometime later crashed
 
OK, here's a summary of my today's testing, running on Win7 quad core comp with so-so connection (about 30Mbps down, only .48 up):

1. the submitter is fast
2. I like the failed submission reports
3. I'd like to see a pause button
4. Crashing on larger lists - maybe you need a delay?
5. I'd like to be able to import proxies from a file instead of (or in addition to) copy/paste
6. I'd like to be able to test links before posting
7. this is a wish list item #1 - I'm not even sure if it's possible, but I'd love to be able to use tokens - grab a title or an excerpt from the post...
8. One can get used to the file setup, but some form of a converter would be nice

You got something here, although it still needs a lot of work.

I will probably try it on my vps later on to compare the results.
 
ok now i was running it with around a 30k list. it started promising , faster than SB and now I thought it should be thgrough and when I check it crashed as well.

Problem signature:
Problem Event Name: CLR20r3
Problem Signature 01: aac trackback submitter.exe
Problem Signature 02: 1.0.0.0
Problem Signature 03: 4ed100fd
Problem Signature 04: AAC Trackback Submitter
Problem Signature 05: 1.0.0.0
Problem Signature 06: 4ed100fd
Problem Signature 07: 1fd
Problem Signature 08: 7
Problem Signature 09: System.NullReferenceException
OS Version: 6.1.7601.2.1.0.768.3
Locale ID: 1033
Additional Information 1: 0a9e
Additional Information 2: 0a9e372d3b4ad19135b953a78882e789
Additional Information 3: 0a9e
Additional Information 4: 0a9e372d3b4ad19135b953a78882e789



Okay i just installed a error report log....new version will be up, a error_log.txt saves the error for reporting to me
you will be notice on program start to download new version in some hours
 
Last edited:
OK, here's a summary of my today's testing, running on Win7 quad core comp with so-so connection (about 30Mbps down, only .48 up):

1. the submitter is fast
2. I like the failed submission reports
3. I'd like to see a pause button
pause button is on my list
4. Crashing on larger lists - maybe you need a delay?
there are some unhandled exceptions...try to fix them with new error loggin system, i use the same code on huge lists...but without gui interface
5. I'd like to be able to import proxies from a file instead of (or in addition to) copy/paste
thats no problem....but you should use private proxies...instead of public..i use just 30...its enough
6. I'd like to be able to test links before posting
what do you mean by this? check url for right format? or do you want to check url for successfull trachback ability by using a random fictive url?
7. this is a wish list item #1 - I'm not even sure if it's possible, but I'd love to be able to use tokens - grab a title or an excerpt from the post...
grab a title is no problem, but the submiter has to download the html source of each page and that would realllllyyy slow em down...is that worth the slow speed? exscpecially if you use really spammed urls...the html source gets really big in such a site...
8. One can get used to the file setup, but some form of a converter would be nice
converter is on my list...

Thank you so far

You got something here, although it still needs a lot of work.

I will probably try it on my vps later on to compare the results.
 
Quote:
6. I'd like to be able to test links before posting
what do you mean by this? check url for right format? or do you want to check url for successfull trachback ability by using a random fictive url?

Well, something similar to "Test comments" in SB so I can be sure everything is OK before blasting
Quote:
7. this is a wish list item #1 - I'm not even sure if it's possible, but I'd love to be able to use tokens - grab a title or an excerpt from the post...
grab a title is no problem, but the submiter has to download the html source of each page and that would realllllyyy slow em down...is that worth the slow speed? exscpecially if you use really spammed urls...the html source gets really big in such a site...

Actually this would be a great thing if you want to fly under the radar as it looks much more natural if the webmaster can see part of their post in the trackback! And who said that you should use "really spammed" urls?
Maybe that could be an option for a "slow mode"? To me this alone would be worth it!

 
it crashed again . this time the error window froze as well.so cant see the error,assume same as last time. id say it has problem with large lists. crahsed at around 30 k this thime
 
it crashed again . this time the error window froze as well.so cant see the error,assume same as last time. id say it has problem with large lists. crahsed at around 30 k this thime

I've added a error reporting to next version....will be released next hours

Pause button is done
proxy load button is done

next: sb converter and spin preview

think should be released next hours....you get a short message to update, if its online
 
okay new version is online

uninstall, download, install new version

improvements:

-Proxy Load button
-Pause Button
-Spin Preview
-Error logging
-some connection improvements
-set max thread to 200 for testing ( but for long runs it is not recommended to use more than 100 threads )
for me i got at 50 threads 1000 urls a minute....think its pretty nice... scrapebox brings 430 a minute with 50 threads

if the submitter crashes, a error_log.txt will be created...please post it

thanxxx
 
Last edited:
Something is wrong with the new file - it basically loops - if you choose yes - it takes you to the download, if you choose no - it just hangs up.
 
yes to download is correct and no should terminate the submitter, cause you should just work with the latest version

okay i do a testrun on a million list now....while take a nice (black) hat of sleep :)
 
Last edited:
Well, when I download the new version and click on the icon - I get a new window with "a newer version is available! Yes takes me to the download (again!) and no does nothing. Have you updated all download links?
 
Back
Top