Looking for Beta Testers for AAC Trackback Submitter
- Thread starter memme
- Start date
dowser
Power Member
- Jun 5, 2011
- 685
- 124
Yes, looks much better! I have to figure out the spintax a bit more as some sites display only some, other sites display all...
If you could get a token like title or author or? from the blog you send the TB to - it would be a winner in my book!
Also (it could be just me) - I couldn't close it using the (x)
If you could get a token like title or author or? from the blog you send the TB to - it would be a winner in my book!
Also (it could be just me) - I couldn't close it using the (x)
mindmaster
Elite Member
- Sep 16, 2010
- 5,671
- 3,112
I am getting 25% success rate on the same list that I get over 60% success in scrapebox.
Tried other lists, made by me or purchased and got the same results, around 25%.
I am used 10 private proxies and only 10 connections (in sb I use 20 connections).
I get error telling me that the submission is to fast, maybe it would be nice to shuffle the list?
Other than that I see that it gets unresponsive when I want to open the list (E), after I stop the blasting. I let it for few hours, but remained unresponsive.
However I am curious how do others get high success rate?
Tried other lists, made by me or purchased and got the same results, around 25%.
I am used 10 private proxies and only 10 connections (in sb I use 20 connections).
I get error telling me that the submission is to fast, maybe it would be nice to shuffle the list?
Other than that I see that it gets unresponsive when I want to open the list (E), after I stop the blasting. I let it for few hours, but remained unresponsive.
However I am curious how do others get high success rate?
dowser
Power Member
- Jun 5, 2011
- 685
- 124
Well, I got up to 85% success rate which is nice, just remember - those are trackbacks that were posted, not found, so it will be inflated (same goes for SB).
I'm really not sure why you get such low results - could be your network, your connection, I don't know.
I'm really not sure why you get such low results - could be your network, your connection, I don't know.
- Sep 19, 2009
- 3,531
- 597
Its not possible to get lower success than scrapebox....
do you use a list, which contains lets say 20 domains with 1000 links in total? so do you post to the same domains ?
SHUFFLE BUTTON done....will be included in next release
what was the size of your list? it is not recommended to edit a list with more than lets say 100.000 entries..it will take too much ressources to display the textbox...i will fix that in future....
-SHUFFLE BUTTON IS DONE
-CONVERTER FROM SCRAPEBOX FORMAT TO AAC IS DONE
-USE TITLES ON THE FLY FROM PAGES YOU POST TO IS DONE
Last edited:
- Sep 19, 2009
- 3,531
- 597
mhm this must be a bug....i load a list with 1 million urls and a size of >50MB in seconds....
maybe the urls are malformed...have you looked into the file? the submitter reads each line as a url and checks for some malformed urls like pdf or jpeg endings....
if you have all url in one line it wont work.
after loading a file the status line at the bottom shows how many urls have passed the filter and getting loaded to the submitter
- Sep 19, 2009
- 3,531
- 597
new version has been release, please login an download full setup
beta tester, please pm me, if you want to reactivate
changelog:
-use titles on the fly
-link checker added. now you can verify your links
-major thread improvement
beta tester, please pm me, if you want to reactivate
changelog:
-use titles on the fly
-link checker added. now you can verify your links
-major thread improvement
dowser
Power Member
- Jun 5, 2011
- 685
- 124
Version 5
OK, let's start with the proxy checker: I've loaded 505 freshly harvested proxies that went through SB's g00gle and IP checker - it looks like your tool is much stricter as only 325 went through - I have no problem with that. Running a list of 1,659 fresh TB's. I forgot to time the start - would be a nice feature to add timer. Running at the default 20 threads.
Again - there is no way to see how the posts would look like before they are sent - it's quite important to make sure everything is OK before blasting to a large list.
There are quite a few "comments too fast" errors - maybe adding a delay would help?
Now this is cosmetic - I think the start / stop / pause buttons should be closer to the urls window, where the status is now or next to it. (this my personal preference).
I can't comment on the speed now as I'm running a scraper in parallel, so will check that the next time around when I will try the "extract titles on the fly" feature.
Will comment on other features when I get there
OK, a quick update: it went to the end of sending and all the buttons greyed out - no function works, although I can click on the links. Not sure what happened. Had to close the program.
OK, let's start with the proxy checker: I've loaded 505 freshly harvested proxies that went through SB's g00gle and IP checker - it looks like your tool is much stricter as only 325 went through - I have no problem with that. Running a list of 1,659 fresh TB's. I forgot to time the start - would be a nice feature to add timer. Running at the default 20 threads.
Again - there is no way to see how the posts would look like before they are sent - it's quite important to make sure everything is OK before blasting to a large list.
There are quite a few "comments too fast" errors - maybe adding a delay would help?
Now this is cosmetic - I think the start / stop / pause buttons should be closer to the urls window, where the status is now or next to it. (this my personal preference).
I can't comment on the speed now as I'm running a scraper in parallel, so will check that the next time around when I will try the "extract titles on the fly" feature.
Will comment on other features when I get there
OK, a quick update: it went to the end of sending and all the buttons greyed out - no function works, although I can click on the links. Not sure what happened. Had to close the program.
Last edited:
dowser
Power Member
- Jun 5, 2011
- 685
- 124
OK, found the preview on excerpts - I still think it should be at the end of the process showing how the whole post would look like to make sure all parts - title, excerpt and url are working.
Ran a small (101) TB list - got 66 successful. This time it went through to the end. I like the feature of checking d0f0ll0w / n0f0ll0w built right at the end of the process, unfortunately it showed zero found trackbacks. I just checked a few from the "successful" list and the TB's were found, so your checker shows false negatives.
By the way - I love the "Extract titles on the fly" feature!
Ran a small (101) TB list - got 66 successful. This time it went through to the end. I like the feature of checking d0f0ll0w / n0f0ll0w built right at the end of the process, unfortunately it showed zero found trackbacks. I just checked a few from the "successful" list and the TB's were found, so your checker shows false negatives.
By the way - I love the "Extract titles on the fly" feature!
- Sep 19, 2009
- 3,531
- 597
that could belong to the timeout settings u used in scrapebox and in aac proxy verifier...use a higher timeout will result in more working proxies....i think that verifier is much more accurate than scrapebox....
okay, i can do a preview button for the whole trackback details...where do u like to have the button?
thats the big advantage af aac trackback submitter...in scrapebox they were treated like "failed", but in most cases u can definitely trackback that page. so aac submitter add the url between last checked url und the end of the list to recheck that url. if the urls fails for more than 10 times it will be treated as failed.... so u get a much higher rate...
okay, do you like that?: http://s14.directupload.net/images/111205/hpnlyk4e.png
aac trackback submitter uses 50 kb bandwidth at 200 threads, but when you activate the titles on fly option, it takes a much more bandwidth
Will comment on other features when I get there
yep, that error is fixed right now
- Sep 19, 2009
- 3,531
- 597
can you send me the success list as txt to my email? or upload it and send me the link.
plus i need the url u have used to verify whats wrong....
thanks
pyronaut
Senior Member
- Dec 9, 2008
- 1,189
- 1,440
Just giving you a pre-warning here memme. You are running a very fine line between selling outside of the BST. I have seen people get banned for less.
If all you need is beta testers, take your testers, get them to email you bug reports. Anything more is simply hyping a product. Not to mention in your video you link to the sales page.
Don't say you weren't warned.
If all you need is beta testers, take your testers, get them to email you bug reports. Anything more is simply hyping a product. Not to mention in your video you link to the sales page.
Don't say you weren't warned.
- Sep 19, 2009
- 3,531
- 597
Okay thanks for warning,
A new forum has been installed. Beta Testers, please login to autoapproveclub.com and goto forum
SO please do not post any further things in this thread
thank you
Last edited: