[Beta/Reviews Needed] Unique Content Generation : SEO : BackLink Building Service

[bluecoyote]

I will rise to the challenge for a review copy. I have a small network of sites 175 of them I want to test this on. Please pm me details .. Thank you

Bluecoyoteseo

 

[jascoken]

1. The char spinner does not seem to protect phrases, tried it twice and it spun them both times.

It protects at word-level, not at phrase level. Just enter individual words with commas in-between and it will be fine. Any phrases that you want to protect should have all their instances of their words protected anyway.

2. A bigger issue, for me anyway is the way all the spinners output the results. You go to a new page with the results and if you want to make any changes or corrections you can not back up and do so. If you go back to the point where you entered in your info it is all gone and you have to start from scratch. I can see this being fairly frustrating for users.

Sorry about that Volund - No one else picked up on that believe it or not! Nicely spotted.... We'll attend to that next week - it's an easy fix.

I presume you mean just clicking the 'back' button - and not clicking the link at the bottom? We can always add a message so that 'back' retains the info and clicking the link at the button brings you back to a 'fresh' input box. Is that what you mean?

 

[jascoken]

No one else picked up on that believe it or not! Nicely spotted.... We'll attend to that next week - it's an easy fix.

Volund... It's been done already - it was a VERY quick fix.

All toolz retain their manually entered data for the browser session (but not individual check-box settings etc.) Now you can visit another tool and then come back and the last used data will still be there. You simply delete it and post new data when you use it again. This is what it should have been doing - so thanks for picking that up!

 

[volund]

Volund... It's been done already - it was a VERY quick fix.

All toolz retain their manually entered data for the browser session (but not individual check-box settings etc.) Now you can visit another tool and then come back and the last used data will still be there. You simply delete it and post new data when you use it again. This is what it should have been doing - so thanks for picking that up!

I was thinking I had tried it both ways so I went back to check and you had already fixed the problem. Very Cool.


Question about the char spinning. I post the output into a wordpress post in html mode then switch back to visual, everything looks good but the spell checker in firefox picks up the spun words as misspelled even though visually they look correct.

Very curious on if there has been any testing on how Google sees them. Really thinking about the supporting/related words in an article. If Google is seeing them as different then all the related terms in an article would need to be protected not just keywords you are targeting.

 

[jascoken]

I was thinking I had tried it both ways so I went back to check and you had already fixed the problem. Very Cool.

...why, thank you kind sir...

Question about the char spinning. I post the output into a wordpress post in html mode then switch back to visual, everything looks good but the spell checker in firefox picks up the spun words as misspelled even though visually they look correct.

As long as you stay in html mode and save it, so it doesn't change it back to UTF, then it's correct. You can view the source code (CTRL U in firefox/chrome) and look for the text - and you'll see letters replaced with the Ñ• type codes.

Firefox probably WILL see these as misspelt - because they are. Char Spinning works by using letters that aren't the correct letters - but look the same...

If I was to spell 'Hello' as 'HeXXo' then it's misspelt... But what if the X char was a greek character that looked like 'l', then it would look like Hello' again - but be spelt wrong in the eyes of the english language.

Very curious on if there has been any testing on how Google sees them. Really thinking about the supporting/related words in an article. If Google is seeing them as different then all the related terms in an article would need to be protected not just keywords you are targeting.

Masses. We've been using it since 2007, and our stats broadly show that we get around 2 times the indexing rate (all other stats factors remaining constant.) But our content is always good, original and very highly spun - we basically run everything at 95%+ spun (using our UberCubez -which are theoretically virtually 100% permanently) - so we get a very high indexing rate anyway.

If you used lower quality or less-spun content then the increase will be higher, because you'll have much more that's seen as original.

I posted that quick dupe-content test above. The URL is:

http://www.blackhatworld.com/blackhat-seo/black-hat-seo/369028-free-unique-content-advanced-char-spinning-case-study-google-indexing.html

...it's not a perfect test, as phpbuilt has pointed out. But it was only done as a sanity check for us. We know it works; we've been using it for 4+ years. The test is merely to see if anything untoward crops up - which we test all our techniques for. I don't need to do comparatives; this wasn't about proving anything to anyone excepy my own internal numbers.

The bottom line is results. If a method gives you more links that stick after 30-90 days, then it's worth using. Lots of methods will give you extra links for 30-60 days, but will then drop out of the index.

I ALWAYS recommend using char-spinning on well-spun original content i the first place - it's just 'another' way of increasing the permutations of spin.

Do your own tests; don't take my word for it....

 

[Getwhatchuwant]

Ok 1st of all let me say WOW! This tool has so many ways to create content and have multiple variations. As we know getting good content that does not jump out as duplicate content is very difficult.

That said I have been working in the Ubercubez module and I must not be formatting correctly as I have had some issues with the output.

For those reading the thread that may not be familiar with this process bascially you find an article you like OR you create one of your own from scratch.

Then you go sentence by sentence and rewrite each line a few times to give you 3+ variations of each sentence.
You then add some syntax that defines each sentence and each paragraph.

What to tool then does is select a sentence from your rewrites or the original and also randomly orders the paragraphs to create a unique article each time.

For example:
black hat world is cool.
black hat world is the best.
black hat world is the greatest.
#S# <--(Indicates the end of the sentence variations)
I visit BHW daily.
I read BHW often.
I like coming to BHW all the time.
#S#
#P# <--(indicates the end of the paragraph)

So the tool will pick one of the 3 sentences and plug it in to create your paragraph.

Now if you then spin the words in each sentence you probably get the idea about how much content you can generate with this method.


That said I have to go back and clean up my setup, I created an article with multiple variations but it is not coming out like I want.

For example one of the paragraph options has syntax like this:

Reasons I like BHW.
Things that bring me back to BHW.
Why I will always come to BHW.
#S#
1.they rock.
1.they rule.
1.they da best.
#S#
2.Lots of smart people here.
2.Lots of helpful people here.
2.Many helpful and smart people here.
#S#
#P#

Yet when I click the ready to go article output the article does not look like I intended.

One of the ways I noticed it is I had "bullet points" labeled 1,2,3,4 in the syntax above but for some reason it is randomly selecting the bullet points and also not keeping the bullet points with the paragraph I want it with.

Does the way I set it up look correct?


***EDIT*** I eliminated any white space (lines) between sentences and it has fixed the problem!!!

 

[jascoken]

One of the ways I noticed it is I had "bullet points" labeled 1,2,3,4 in the syntax above but for some reason it is randomly selecting the bullet points and also not keeping the bullet points with the paragraph I want it with.

Does the way I set it up look correct?

***EDIT*** I eliminated any white space (lines) between sentences and it has fixed the problem!!!

Thanks for your great explanation!

You also picked up on a small bug there! Blank lines should be ignored... But they weren't being. I just had a look myself and it's down to a peculiar niggle with the way PHP rebuilds array keys with certain functions.

Anyway - it was only 2 lines of code so I changed it myself. It will now ignore blank lines - so you don't have to worry about that anymore.

BTW: If you're doing 'full-on bullet' points in a paragraph and want to spread them out properly you can do them like this:

RReasons I like BHW:
Things that bring me back to BHW:
Why I will always come to BHW:
#SB#
1.they rock.
1.they rule.
1.they da best.
#SB#
2.Lots of smart people here.
2.Lots of helpful people here.
2.Many helpful and smart people here.
#SB#
3.Other stuff.
3.More stuff.
3.Even more stuff.
#S#
#P#

Using #SB# (Sentence Break) instead of #S# (Sentence end) - gives the line-break - but keeps all of them together up to the #P# (Paragraph end)
And note the use of the #S# before the #P# (not another #SB#), as other otherwise it will output 2 x line breaks - one for the #SB# and then one for the #P# (end of the paragraph).

 

[NapsteR]

I'd love to review your service... If still open...

 

[Getwhatchuwant]

Thanks for your great explanation!

You also picked up on a small bug there! Blank lines should be ignored... But they weren't being. I just had a look myself and it's down to a peculiar niggle with the way PHP rebuilds array keys with certain functions.

Anyway - it was only 2 lines of code so I changed it myself. It will now ignore blank lines - so you don't have to worry about that anymore.

.

Glad to have helped!! BTW downloaded a free "auto" (use the term loosely) article submitter in conjunction with your auto title spin tool, the uber cubez tool and the link coder tool and it works like a champ..got about 10 articles out there.. I am going to wait a fed days for the auto spinner you are adding and continue to submit the article. Cant wait!

 

[volund]

OK I do not think I made my question clear. Not really sure it was really a question as much as a possibly an observation on how to make sure I get the best bang for the buck on the articles.

The words are being changed to something else even though they look the same. Now obviously you want to protect your targeted keywords but since the words are getting changed I guess we really need to protect our related/supporting text as well.

For example if I was targeting

Trains

as my keyword

I would also want to protect any related keywords in the article such as

train tracks
locomotive

etc etc so that the article still has the key supporting text in a format that the bots will recognize as related.


I like the title builder, I can see that saving me a bit of time.

...why, thank you kind sir...


Masses. We've been using it since 2007, and our stats broadly show that we get around 2 times the indexing rate (all other stats factors remaining constant.) But our content is always good, original and very highly spun - we basically run everything at 95%+ spun (using our UberCubez -which are theoretically virtually 100% permanently) - so we get a very high indexing rate anyway.

If you used lower quality or less-spun content then the increase will be higher, because you'll have much more that's seen as original.

I posted that quick dupe-content test above. The URL is:

http://www.blackhatworld.com/blackh...char-spinning-case-study-google-indexing.html

...it's not a perfect test, as phpbuilt has pointed out. But it was only done as a sanity check for us. We know it works; we've been using it for 4+ years. The test is merely to see if anything untoward crops up - which we test all our techniques for. I don't need to do comparatives; this wasn't about proving anything to anyone excepy my own internal numbers.

The bottom line is results. If a method gives you more links that stick after 30-90 days, then it's worth using. Lots of methods will give you extra links for 30-60 days, but will then drop out of the index.

I ALWAYS recommend using char-spinning on well-spun original content i the first place - it's just 'another' way of increasing the permutations of spin.

Do your own tests; don't take my word for it....

 

[jascoken]

BTW downloaded a free "auto" (use the term loosely) article submitter in conjunction with your auto title spin tool, the uber cubez tool and the link coder tool and it works like a champ..got about 10 articles out there.. I am going to wait a fed days for the auto spinner you are adding and continue to submit the article. Cant wait!

Use AMR if you have it. Combined; these tools rock...

The Title Builder ensure that every one has a unique title, and that it has your required proper exact/phrase match keywords embedded, but it's not over-optimised.

The Link Coder quickly outputs a full tracking signature, with a wide selection of mixed URL's and correctly SEO optimised mixed/keyword anchors, plus an in-content html link-block to drop in after a 'middle' paragraph.

The Char-Spinner ensures that it gets the maximum indexation.

We do all this with UberCubez as the base output article.

We use AMR on a powerful submission PC (Win 7 x64, quad core, SSD drive, fast ram) and use 75-100 threads. This yields about 3 full submission runs per hour including entry. At 700-900 submissions per run, that's 2-2.5k completely original/unique articles per hour.

Then we use ScrapeBox to harvest the "author name", plus we also use AMR's 'LiveLinks' function and get a combined list of article URL's.

The URL|Anchors tool then turns all those URL's into a submission-ready list with a variety of mixed anchors to drop into ScrapeBox commenter and DFB (Drip Feed Blasts) for 2nd tier links.

We then setup Nuclear Link Crawler (quarter the price of LinkLicious) to auto-crawl all the 4k per day DFB links that backlink to our 1st tier content links.

AMR (for 1st tier links) combined with ScrapeBox/DFB/Nuclear Link Crawler for 2nd/3rd tier and crawler forcing produces a storm of links across your sites/pages.

There are links to all those other tools on our members page if you want to check them out.

Oh, and Getwhatchuwant...

Don't forget that using the BlogPoster is SO much faster than manually adding WordPress posts. It's virtually instant and auto-spins and adds as it goes. You can always login afterwards and add/mod any layout if you want.

 

[jascoken]

Not really sure it was really a question as much as a possibly an observation on how to make sure I get the best bang for the buck on the articles.

...

...etc so that the article still has the key supporting text in a format that the bots will recognize as related.

In our experience, people can get too hung up on getting perfect contextual-content. I completely understand what you're saying, but our tests show we get almost as much link-juice from articles that have NO relevance to the anchor-link, as we do from perfectly-targeted articles. The only thing that really matters is the article title; if you have your keywords in the page/article title then it makes quite a difference (with 'harder' keywords anyway... Easy long-tails just don't matter - a link is a link - is a link!)

Therefore, it's irrelevant if some of the content is obfuscated from the SE's -it's all about it looked original/unique so you can get it crawled/indexed. As long as they see 60-80% of it, then they can glean the context, and you never char-spin a title, so they get the main contextual relationship from that.

But if it concerned you, then yes, you could add 50 protected words in. When you've tried it enough - and tested and measured your results though - you won't bother so hard...

I like the title builder, I can see that saving me a bit of time.

The Title Builder is one of the gems of this suite, and over time you will realise just HOW much time this saves. Without it, building titles for all our content/SEO would be a nightmare for us. We handle some major campaigns, and keyword-rich phrase-match (but de-optimised) titles are SO important.

You want your keyword in the correct order and together (phrase match) but you want them surrounded by prefix/suffixes of a huge variety to generate MASSES of contextual, but different anchors.

Really... The Title Builder, the UberCubez and the Link Coder are my favourite tools by a long shot. (Plus our Auto-Spintaxer - which we'll be adding this week after we've done a full synonym 'harvest' and then manual-check update on our thesaurus. This makes creating UberCubez even easier.)

 

[sukataetumba]

I haven't been able to play around with all the features but so far I am just loving the Title Builder.

It easily gives you ideas of what topics you can write about. You can scrape articles using those titles and generate unique content.

Title Builder - my favorite tool as well.

 

[jascoken]

I haven't been able to play around with all the features but so far I am just loving the Title Builder.

It easily gives you ideas of what topics you can write about. You can scrape articles using those titles and generate unique content.

Title Builder - my favorite tool as well.

The Title Builder is a gem...

It's not until you've used it for a little while that you start to realise just how many areas this affects.

Coming up with varied, yet phrase-optimised titles for all our content is a right pain when you need a large volume. This solves it instantly.

We use if for building sites/blogs out (with Title Builder titles and UberCubez content) and also for stoking our link networks (using the LinkCoder to build loads of content with random embedded links out to our sites.)

UPDATE: The AutoSpintaxer should be ready for release by Wed night/Thur morning (48 hrs). We have our in-house technical writer going through the entire synonym library, cleaning it up and removing spins where they don't make sense the majority of time (This is a horrible job for her! Mind numbingly brain-bending & boring!) We expect our AutoSpintaxer to produce reasonable quality output - not just spun junk. And it's fast too. It takes less than 0.5s to fully auto-spin an 800 word article. That's quick - believe me, especially with the size and complexity of our synonym/phrase DB.
PS. It will also have a 'rewrite' mode to just rewrite the article with alternate words where available.

 

[jascoken]

The AutoSpintaxer is live!

And it's been tweaked & streamlined to be even faster too; so we've been able to crank up the size-handling to 6,250 characters/approx 1,000 words.

It also has a simple 'rewrite' mode to just rewrite the article with alternate words where available

 

[Getwhatchuwant]

The AutoSpintaxer is live!

And it's been tweaked & streamlined to be even faster too; so we've been able to crank up the size-handling to 6,250 characters/approx 1,000 words.

It also has a simple 'rewrite' mode to just rewrite the article with alternate words where available

Another nice tool!! Just plugged in an article and it spins roughly 40% of the words in the article (rough estimate with a by hand count) and the quality is pretty good. Obviously like suggested you do a visual check before posting to your blog but for generic article submissions for link building this is perfect. At worst it looks like a non native English speaker made the article. At best you will have a few sentences or words to correct for your personal websites.

Good stuff!

 

[jascoken]

Incredible New Option Launched For PREMIUM Members!

Uber Articlez: FREE Daily Original Articles

As a BONUS for our Premium members: We now provide access to our constantly updated database of pre-built original articles & content across 50 different niches and topics. This database is used by us internally as part of our ongoing marketing & SEO.

Every day, Premium members earn 3 credits. 1 credit can be used to download 1 single unique article in any of the 50 or so categories. The system will only store 15 credits max., so you need to visit at least once every 5 days to spend them (to prevent members from stock-piling credits.)

Simply select the article category, and click the button... & That's it!

You'll immediately be presented with a full 'ready-to-go' (500-550 words) original article which will then be deleted from our DataBase, to ensure it's only used once per member.

If you consider that it costs around $1 per 100 words to get an article written, then 3 per day would be $15, or $450 per month...

Check it now guys! All Premium members have been awarded 3 credits now...

 

[jascoken]

We've decided to drop the price of the Standard Membership to only $17p.m!

(for BHW Members via our special discount link < http://anonym.to/?http://ubertoolz.com/?aid=bhw >)

Remember: Premium Membership now includes DAILY FREE ARTICLE CONTENT...

 

[volund]

Incredible New Option Launched For PREMIUM Members!

Uber Articlez: FREE Daily Original Articles

As a BONUS for our Premium members: We now provide access to our constantly updated database of pre-built original articles & content across 50 different niches and topics. This database is used by us internally as part of our ongoing marketing & SEO.

Every day, Premium members earn 3 credits. 1 credit can be used to download 1 single unique article in any of the 50 or so categories. The system will only store 15 credits max., so you need to visit at least once every 5 days to spend them (to prevent members from stock-piling credits.)

Simply select the article category, and click the button... & That's it!

You'll immediately be presented with a full 'ready-to-go' (500-550 words) original article which will then be deleted from our DataBase, to ensure it's only used once per member.

If you consider that it costs around $1 per 100 words to get an article written, then 3 per day would be $15, or $450 per month...

Check it now guys! All Premium members have been awarded 3 credits now...

I have to say I already thought this was an extremely well thought out and useful set of tools and you just keep adding more icing to the cake. Very Very Cool......Are you planning on having affiliates? I could probably push a few your way once you open up for business.

 

[jascoken]

I have to say I already thought this was an extremely well thought out and useful set of tools and you just keep adding more icing to the cake. Very Very Cool...

...Are you planning on having affiliates? I could probably push a few your way once you open up for business.

Thanks Volund!

It's great to hear feedback like that...

We've been building and developing the essence of these tools for 4-5 years, and there's an enormous amount of SEO research behind them - which is not always obvious to those that are new to the game!

Many people seem to focus on the char-spinner - but that's actually not one of our 'key' tools in-house (although we DO char-spin virtually all article submissions for an added indexation effect.) We have a lot more tools in-house, and we've now added the majority of the 'headline' ones to UberToolz; but there are lots of smaller/focused tools areas that we can bring in over time, depending on what members want, and what tools and systems they currently use.

I'll be PM'ing you about the Affiliate program. Yes, there is one...