Permanently Closed Marketplace Sales Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
Ok, not showing some I can deal with but showing none of them? After 80 link pushes 3/4 months ago?

I have a site that I built and only used my linkpushing service to backlink it and have over 300 LPs directed to the site which means I have an awful lot of backlinks for that site and only 8 are showing.

But the site is ranking for a lot of different KWs.

The first site I ever built I know has over 3,000 backlinks to it as I did the majority of them myself and it only shows around 600 in total.

I don't trust any of those tools anymore myself.
 
Quick questions if we are doing multiple pushes targeting the same url. So for each new LP the name of the LP should be different if we are still targeting the same url correct? So if my 1st LP is named "dog training" and I'm using "dog training" and "dog training service" as my keywords to rank for then when go back and submit another LP for the same url and keywords should I name that one "dogtraining2" and use the "dog training" and "dog training service" as the keywords?

I ask because doesn't the system use those keywords to create the account urls for the Web2.0 sites and if we use the same keywords for each LP and I'm sure some of the Web2.0 sites will be created again in subsequent LPs won't it not create that account since it will see that url is already taken since I've been using the same keywords every time?

Does the system add a number or extra character after these keywords to make them unique?

One other question I had is do we need to check each LP after it has finished to make sure the various properties were created and are still there or ones that failed to be created and report those back to redo or get taken care of? I just don't want to waste alot of time going back to these after I submitted them and would like to see the system take of the tasks? What sort of percentage of sites fail to and is there a way that the system notifiies us if it does indeed fail?
 
Last edited:
With the great reviews, and apparently good support, I'm in for this service. If it works well, I'll certainly utilize more of my budget on this.

I already paid, logged in and setup my first LP in under five minutes. That's awesome. But the proof is in the pudding, so let's see how my search engine positions move...
 
Quick questions if we are doing multiple pushes targeting the same url. So for each new LP the name of the LP should be different if we are still targeting the same url correct? So if my 1st LP is named "dog training" and I'm using "dog training" and "dog training service" as my keywords to rank for then when go back and submit another LP for the same url and keywords should I name that one "dogtraining2" and use the "dog training" and "dog training service" as the keywords?

I generally vary the KWs some so as to make things look natural for Google.


I ask because doesn't the system use those keywords to create the account urls for the Web2.0 sites and if we use the same keywords for each LP and I'm sure some of the Web2.0 sites will be created again in subsequent LPs won't it not create that account since it will see that url is already taken since I've been using the same keywords every time?

No, it will create an entierly new account 99% of the time.


Does the system add a number or extra character after these keywords to make them unique?

It does make adjustments so that things are unique.

One other question I had is do we need to check each LP after it has finished to make sure the various properties were created and are still there or ones that failed to be created and report those back to redo or get taken care of? I just don't want to waste alot of time going back to these after I submitted them and would like to see the system take of the tasks? What sort of percentage of sites fail to and is there a way that the system notifiies us if it does indeed fail?

I never check mine but we are building an auto checker for this to make things even better.
 
I generally vary the KWs some so as to make things look natural for Google.

If we keep varying the keywords for each LP that we are targeting the same url/keyword we want to rank then we will have a hard time ranking for our specific keyword if we keep diluting the anchor text so much with different keywords or am I not understanding this correctly?

So base on your suggestion f want to rank for example my url for "dog training" keyword then should I just use various keywords but still have "dog traning" as part of the keywords for each LP. So for 1st LP my 3 keywords can be "dog training" "best dog training" and "dog training tips" and then 2nd LP would be "dog training guide" "dog training pointers" "easy dog training", etc.... Would that be a way to vary the anchor text but also help me rank for the term "dog training"? Or should I have the exact keyword "dog training" at least one once for each LP and vary the other 2 keywords each time?
 
If we keep varying the keywords for each LP that we are targeting the same url/keyword we want to rank then we will have a hard time ranking for our specific keyword if we keep diluting the anchor text so much with different keywords or am I not understanding this correctly?

What KWs do you use for your other backlinking?

Are you using the same KWs?

Are you not targeting innner pages that are targeting your other KWs?

If all you are doing is targeting one KW for one page, you are in deep sneakers for your site and it will not do what you want to do long term.
 
Just to make it easy, I'll be posting the Coupon Code for the BHW members periodically.

Here's the BHW coupon - B5EEDB4E63 or 323957875A

It will give you 10% off your subscription and it is a recurring coupon so
it will be active for you as long as that subscription remains active.

Also you can DL our Best Practices E-Book here - http://linkpushing.net/blog/faq/253/

And our Video Tutorials here - http://linkpushing.net/blog/video-tutorials/
__________________
 
Greg, have been trying to get a hold of you by email for a couple weeks now about problems with your service. Based on your forum activity it's obvious you've received them, and I don't know what your situation is but from my side it seems that you're just trying to avoid dealing with it. All I want is to receive the full advertised service for what I've paid - nothing more, nothing less. Could you please reply to your emails? Thanks.
 
Last edited:
oh no... hope its not long... :(

The website you were trying to reach is temporarily unavailable.
Please check back soon.

If you are the owner of this website, please log in for additional
information or contact us as soon as possible.
 
Still down...hopefully they will get it sorted soon, I just ordered their service yesterday and I'm excited to use it :)
 
Greg, have been trying to get a hold of you by email for a couple weeks now about problems with your service. Based on your forum activity it's obvious you've received them, and I don't know what your situation is but from my side it seems that you're just trying to avoid dealing with it. All I want is to receive the full advertised service for what I've paid - nothing more, nothing less. Could you please reply to your emails? Thanks.

I may or may not have received them; what is the email address you are sending from and I'll search my email to see if I have them.

Gmail often puts things in the spam folder that ought to be going to the regular mail.
 
Still down...hopefully they will get it sorted soon, I just ordered their service yesterday and I'm excited to use it :)

It will be back up soon I am sure; Kevin handles that end of things and he is in France on vacation and his internet access is spotty so please give him some time to get things squared away.
 
oh shoot bro you not paying your hosting bill :)
will wait till you up again
 
oh shoot bro you not paying your hosting bill :)
will wait till you up again

Nah, the hosting is paid through the end of October; this is a performance issue according to the hosting service.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top