As things stand I'm using Tweet Adder to follow/unfollow and plug those people into my autoblogs via WPR.
Now I'm still thinking that the main benefit Tweet Attacks has over Tweet Adder is basically the wait and reply mode.
Method 1 is building your followers up over weeks and months and market products to those followers.
Method 2 is using Tweet Attacks and using the reply function to catch certain phrases and @reply to them with things such as "I see you're after {product} check out {affiliate link}.
Would people who own Tweet Attacks agree that these 2 are the main methods?
Method 2 above I do have doubts, but that's because Method 2 looks like a much less 'set and forget' as you'll need to create new accounts every day when the others get banned. For this to work you need a never ending supply of proxies and a Twitter account creator which can set 100s up within minutes - however someone has said the Yahoo email isn't working and pretty sure the' Gmail trick' won't pass as if Twitter ban 1 account they ban them all in the same Gmail list.
Method 1, which is what Shezboy's twisted autoblog method is, looks far more likely for accounts to last longer and with Tweet Adder it could be literally set and forget, perhaps checking once a week to make sure WP Robot is still working ok.
It doesn't mean I won't be testing this method, but if you have something like Tweet Adder, I'm really not fully getting why you need Tweet Attacks, unless you do plan on doing Method 2. Unless it offers other benefits too, even if you don't go down that road?