Permanently Closed Marketplace Sales Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
hello, first of all congrats for a well done service.

I wanted to ask you what pack do you recommend for a brand new website 2 days old, competition is low.

thanks
 
Question how about a forum for this so we can ask questions.
Like I would like to know what the PDF is for always show blank for me.

And how many links am I getting per month per url ? :)

And forum could let us know new things or offer new feature .

A forum is a good idea... the PDF shouldn't be blank it should look like this:

http://linkpushing.net/genpdf/70/0/linkwheels

I'll take a look and see why yours s not showing up properly.

Not overly pretty by any means but the idea is to get a link on an authority site for you.

Each link push will get you Between 18 and 26 links directly linking to your site per push and between 35 - 75 backlinks linking to the original 18 and 26.

So if you have the premuim package every month you will get between
216 and 312 direct links and between 420 and 900 indirect links.

The numbers are going to vary a lot to keep things random.
 
hello, first of all congrats for a well done service.

I wanted to ask you what pack do you recommend for a brand new website 2 days old, competition is low.

thanks

Drew - I would go with the basic subscription, 5 linkpushes a month. I would doubt you would need any more than that if your on site SEO is in order.
 
Site seems to be running quicker now and the latest link push has microblogging and share docs which is very nice. Not using any other SEO for a couple of KWs on my site that i'm targetting so will be interesting to see the results after a month or so! :)

EDIT: if you seen the original post ignore... got a reply to my email in minutes! :)
 
Site seems to be running quicker now and the latest link push has microblogging and share docs which is very nice. Not using any other SEO for a couple of KWs on my site that i'm targetting so will be interesting to see the results after a month or so! :)

EDIT: if you seen the original post ignore... got a reply to my email in minutes! :)

From Kevin just minutes ago:



show details 5:29 PM (0 minutes ago)

Hi Greg,
I have just fixed a bug where the scheduled start wasn't being used properly, so pushes were starting before they should. There might be a post in BHW on it. Anyway its fixed now.
I was wondering why the scheduled starts weren't being processed as quickly as they should.

The guy is on it folks... we also added another server to make the process quicker for you guys.

Thanks for the business as well as the suggestions and letting us know when there are issues!
 
Last edited:
just signed in, looking forward to fire and sodomy

edit: not on right place, sry; I mean to test it, so far so good, first job alread done :P
 
Last edited:
10 from 16 web 2.0 submission failed, there's no link of my site (nor at related sites) instead from other link in content (this link also 404)
 
10 from 16 web 2.0 submission failed, there's no link of my site (nor at related sites) instead from other link in content (this link also 404)

I run into the same issues so I add a html link in the article that points to my money site. The only problem with that is, it takes away from the wheel because every page is pointing to the money page now.

BTB, Your service is great, easy and has the potential to be very powerful but, the problem stated is a major problem. Have your coder make the 2.0 pages contain a money site link within the article and then a spoke link at the bottom. Not sure if that is the way it is supposed to work now, but it doesn't. Re-queuing is a bit of a pain because it makes it more of a babysit job instead of an automation service and when there is 72 pushes going on a month, that is a lot of babysitting.

A couple of more updates that would make the user panel a little better; when you click a link to view an article, have the link contain a target="_blank" so it will open in a new window. Regarding the same link, a:visited should be a different color to help us keep track of what links we've checked.
 
I just watched your video and the web 2.0 aren't all suposed to point to the money site, just 6 or so... I was under the impression that all of the 2.0's pointed to it. Disregard my previous post as all seems to be well now.

I just noticed that all but 2 of my pushes were processing... got a little scared but I see that it has been resolved and shouldn't happen again.

+Rep +Thank +iTrader aka awesome service!
 
just purchased the 27$ pack for a start...i am really curious so see the results...will be back for feedback
 
Should the tier1 articles be using our kw anchor text? I noticed mine are using the 2.0 titles as anchor text but linking to my site. Thanks.
 
3 days and still no updates - still getting "Processing - Scheduled for 2011-01-10" in my account. I've paid the money for it, so why am I getting nothing for it?
 
Should the tier1 articles be using our kw anchor text? I noticed mine are using the 2.0 titles as anchor text but linking to my site. Thanks.

That's a little unusual to say the least... shoot me your username via pm please and I'll see what the issue is and get it fixed.
 
3 days and still no updates - still getting "Processing - Scheduled for 2011-01-10" in my account. I've paid the money for it, so why am I getting nothing for it?

Processing means your articles are being created and put on the various sites... you can take a look and see what sites are already built inside your
control panel.

Scheduled for XXX date means the process begins that day, not that it is completed that day. If the entire linkpush is created in one day, that does not look natural to the search engines.

You are getting value for your dollar... it's just not an instantaneous process.
 
mate, i have checked my old report again and it appears some of those sites (web 2.0) now put nofollow links policy, what's your opinion on this?
 
mate, i have checked my old report again and it appears some of those sites (web 2.0) now put nofollow links policy, what's your opinion on this?

I'm personally a 90/10 guy follow/nofollow as that is a natural looking backlinking process. The more natural and random you make things look the better off you are.

Although the only no follow I look to place personally are on wikipedia, I know that when I built linkpushes manually I put articles on sites with no follow attributes.
 
Ok, I have checked and so far, I have a combined total of 31 (web 2.0, bookmarks, etc) - it even says I have 1 Doc Share Post and 1 Microblog post in the heading, but no links are listed below; not sure why.

I also found all the pages the post is on at the moment, the links back to my site aren't using my keywords to great effect.

For example, if my main keyword was 'football top', most of the links I have found to my site have something like 'buying footballers tops online' - how will this have any effect on increasing my rank for 'football top'?
 
Ok, I have checked and so far, I have a combined total of 31 (web 2.0, bookmarks, etc) - it even says I have 1 Doc Share Post and 1 Microblog post in the heading, but no links are listed below; not sure why.

I also found all the pages the post is on at the moment, the links back to my site aren't using my keywords to great effect.

For example, if my main keyword was 'football top', most of the links I have found to my site have something like 'buying footballers tops online' - how will this have any effect on increasing my rank for 'football top'?

Why don't you shoot me your username via PM and I'll look at your linkpushes extensively for you.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top