Warning - Save your money!

[tom4business]

Google won't know, but these web 2.0 sites will surely know if you're building multiple properties from the same site. However, It's perfectly fine if you're building just one "linkwheel"

no google wont know

 

[txholdem]

You can try BLE plugin for this purpose.

We are getting close to 40% indexing rate in less than a week's time.

i have no problem indexing my own site. i suppose BLE is for own wordpress site?

 

[vlerian]

I never really count it, but according to my experiences so far, using this RSS method, more then 50% profiles will be indexed. If you buy them (the profiles), maybe the seller blasts your links on banned forums/sites, no matter what you do, it won't get indexed.

wow - that sounds encouraging! you can get a profile to index that easily? (profiles are really junk..) My purchased profiles were like 5-10% indexed after 2 months! What's the percentage of your indexed profiles? don't tell me it's 100%???? (if its 100%, i must be doing something very wrong!)

I would love to find out that I have done something wrong! can you look at more of your profiles PLEASE???

thanks!

 

[tom4business]

No, it's for indexing profile links.

You need to setup some wordpress blogs and web 2.0 sites for this purpose. This plugin will pickup content from the list of feeds you specify and post them in specific intervals. Along with each post, it adds links back to your profile links. The whole setup may take couple of hours work. But it's worth a try IMHO

i have no problem indexing my own site. i suppose BLE is for own wordpress site?

 

[txholdem]

Convert them into feeds and submit to rss site. Ping the exact Rss submission URL.

by "Ping the exact Rss submission URL," you mean ping the feed URL right?
if thats the case, its nothing different from what i have done..

 

[vis3r]

First of all, you have to distinguish between Indexing and Spidering

What the google bot does to crawl the links is called spidering. And if the site the google bot spiders also meets certain criteria, it gets indexed.

For your links, it is not important for the site the link is on to get indexed, but to get spidered.

Many profile links won't get indexed (even if they've been spidered) because they don't offer any valuable content (there's millions of the same profile pages), or just don't meet some criteria for them to be indexed. Which doesn't mean that the link you've put on that profile won't be followed by the google bot and counted towards your website.

You know a site's been spidered if it gets indexed. But if it isn't indexed, it doesn't mean it wasn't spidered.

 

[txholdem]

I don't know why your properties can't get indexed. You have pinged, bookmarked, and rss feed them, and usually it's enough to get them indexed. I don't think dupe content will make them hard to index.

Here is my case. I created profile links with crappy spun contents 2 days ago, I'm sure your linkwheel contents are better then mine (you buy it after all). Convert them into feeds and submit to rss site. Ping the exact Rss submission URL.

Now, I just took one profile link (just to make a proof for this post) and it is indexed. Haven't checked the other profiles but I'm sure (according to my experiences so far) most of them have been indexed.

edit: put another random profile link, submit the URL on google, and it is indexed.

OK, maybe I make a mistake here. how do you (guys) determine "indexed"? I simply paste the exact URL on Google and if it's found I consider it as indexed. Am I wrong? Damn... I'm confused now, and I thought I know SEO.. lmao

waterdamage: In SEO wise, I don't think so, even if Google can detect it (people said that G knows everything, ermm.. maybe they meant God not google), I don't think they will use their power resource to do it, do they? But for the web 2.0 registration, maybe. Some sites maybe won't allow multiple registration from identical IP. Again, maybe I'm wrong here. Not really pay attention on web2.0

theoretically, "site:" operator gives you the indexing results. without the operator, it's equivalent to "allintext:" or "intext:" operators. so without the operator, it can theoretically returns sites that mention your URL and it does not even have to be a hyperlink.

 

[pasdoy]

A linkwheel will kill your website on long term unfortunatly, as profile links. You have to keep doing it heh

 

[txholdem]

A linkwheel will kill your website on long term unfortunatly, as profile links. You have to keep doing it heh

can you explain? why? - and why?

 

[sammy12]

A linkwheel will kill your website on long term unfortunatly, as profile links. You have to keep doing it heh

Wrong. At worst it may not 'help', but there isn't much you can really do to 'kill' your site. Otherwise, you could set up linkwheels to 'kill' your competition. Which will never work.

First of all, you have to distinguish between Indexing and Spidering

What the google bot does to crawl the links is called spidering. And if the site the google bot spiders also meets certain criteria, it gets indexed.

For your links, it is not important for the site the link is on to get indexed, but to get spidered.

Many profile links won't get indexed (even if they've been spidered) because they don't offer any valuable content (there's millions of the same profile pages), or just don't meet some criteria for them to be indexed. Which doesn't mean that the link you've put on that profile won't be followed by the google bot and counted towards your website.

You know a site's been spidered if it gets indexed. But if it isn't indexed, it doesn't mean it wasn't spidered.

Nice analysis, vis3r. A page or site may not get indexed because of any number of factors, including length of page/post, spun content, too many other pages w/ duplicate content in the indexing system, etc, etc. As vis3r said, it doesn't mean it didn't or doesn't get spidered.

 

[mrcashout]

There are better methods out their for ranking you website higher. Simple SEO and Article Marketing will be more effective than a linkwheel. IMO.

 

[goodseoman]

Just finished beta test of my auto web 2.0 bot 1 week ago. Try it free here.
http://www.blackhatworld.com/blackh...id-link-push-link-bomb-link-tyre-mininet.html

Thought to myself, now what, if i can not rank highly for web 2.0 related keywords, how i can do it for my cuctomers with their keywords?
So i shot a try to my 3 months old site hosted at US. Here is the result after 1 week:

keyword/results/position

web 2.0 link wheel creation 1,210,000 3
link push 120,000,000 3
mininet 385,000 4
linkwheel creation service 6,190,000 4
best link wheel 58,100,000 5
link pyramid 12,700,000 6
web 2.0 link wheel 7,730,000 6
link bomb 35,800,000 7
linkwheel software 33,200 8
linkwheel 107,000 20
linkwheel services 97,200,000 22
linkwheel seo 1,760,000 28

i own hundreds of sites with thousands of keywords. I dont care if it is long tail or short tail keyword, i just get all of them. The same to my web 2.0 keywords.

Just wonder if it makes any sense!

BTW,
Linkbuilding bots and packets are designed for experienced SEOers and webmasters who know exactly what they are doing, how to do and what to expect with their site in SERP. They use bots and backlink packets as tools to achieve their targets. You have to use them at your own risk and your SEO knowledge.
High ranking is based on lots of factors: onpage SEO + backlink popularity + competitors + the competition of keywords... So do not hope for huge boost right away with tough keywords that can bring you tons of money just by spending few bucks. And it takes some time for your links to be indexed and your SERP moving.