Some of what you said in Post #52 of that thread confused the hell outta me haha, but I think I get the basic idea.
So if BHW Hosting is no good, who would you recommend I use to keep all my sites separate and as under the radar as possible?
I don't have any recomendations as I've never seen SEO hosting as valid. But if you want to really implement it, then the way I would do it is describer in a different post I made (see here).
The following is a copy of the relevant bit:
Basically put, in order for SEO hosting to work they way it's sold, you'd have to host as if you had access to servers in different countries across the world. Once you get to that level of separation then we can really discuss SEO hosting - the way the idea is sold, but not implement.
I've been waiting for someone to bring up a little glaring problem with Class C usage. But as no one has brought it up I might as well put this stupid concept to death. Classful address ranges stopped being used as the means of dividing up the pool of IP address in 1994. Good luck trying to get a real class C address range today let alone 10 years ago.
From 1994 VLSM (Variable Length Subnet Masking) become the standard way of giving out IP address ranges. Now that's not to say that those who were given real class C IP address ranges stopped using them or can still allocate them today it's just very unlikely that any hosting company offering SEO hosting will actual have any real class C address ranges with a real /24 subnet mask (aka: 255.255.255.0) Which is why I wanted access to a test account to run ifconfig as that is the only way to tell.