We have a movement called the "Tea Party" that rants over government waste, screaming we should "take the country back" but has no plan to implement anything. Taking the country back seems to be about voting out incumbents and cutting services, but there is little talk about touching the sources of the real expenditures: entitlements, particularly social security and Medicare. If you're a politician suggesting the need to touch Medicare, you're killing granny, etc., and she's gonna show up pushing her walker at the polls to vote you out (if she hasn't already hit you with a cane at the Tea Party meeting).
Waste in the military budget is another target for cuts, but you can't suggest that out of fear of being tagged a traitor, pinko, etc.
Sarkozy has actually acted on the need to cut back on entitlements — in their case the artificially low retirement age — and riots are the result. Few US politicians, even the raving righties, have the courage to suggest we should anything of the kind here. It's politically safer to target food stamp recipients, unemployment and illegal immigrants, rather than focus on where most of the money goes.
As for my own politics, I am progressive, but see the need to limit certain perks and goodies before we go completely broke. I am fully supportive of the president's health care reform, realizing that the "system" is totally lopsided. A large percentage of the money goes toward paying for end of life medical benefits for seniors. The money needs to be more evenly distributed toward children and younger workers who can't buy coverage.