6 Sites Sanboxed/Killed Since Using....

[G0D0VERY0U]

What's bad neighborhood for you ? Pages/Domains with too much OBL ? Too much spammy anchors like viagra/cialis etc ?

I personally don't have any bad neighborhoods. East Cleveland is a little shitty, but I live in a west side suburb, so I'm okay.

Google has some Bad Neighborhoods. I can't take information and illustrations that would have taken 6 hours of video to illustrate and explain and summarize it in a 10 paragraph, or even a 10 page post. It is simply too much information to explain in simple terms because it's not as easy as 1+1=2.

Each person must be their own detective for what makes up bad neighborhoods, because I'm not willing to give the footprints I've identified away. That would just add to the further proliferation of chaos caused by people who never even knew who I was, let alone knew that they got their information through a complex version of "Telephone" and didn't understand why they were doing what they were doing.

To beat their new system, you have to understand the complete operating theory of it. That's why the information can't be shrunk down - when you lose details, holes are created that can create footprints that you may not be aware of - or the holes can prevent you from identifying patterns that Google is looking for. It's simply beyond the scope of this post to elaborate on any further, and the answer as stated above is no - I won't give the footprint's away that I've already learned. Too many people on this board have tried to kick me in the teeth every time I try to help, so I don't anymore beyond vague concepts... That's what this post is - a post about the vague reason why people are seeing this happen.

Anyone try to PR leak a parasite from just blog comment's lately? How's that working out? Maybe that was an example of one possible super simple, kindergarten level footprint... maybe not, but that is all you will get for now.

I'm sure that soon enough someone will release a $97 link spammer's bible that will have a lot of this information in it anyways. It's not like I have exclusive knowledge of the system or anything....

 

[insider]

What you are witnessing with your blog comments is the 5th step in the negative feedback loop of the link spam identification system that Google put into place months ago. It's actually 4 steps removed what what really is causing the problem.

Unless you work at google, all this is your suppositions, not the truth. Nobody on this board knows for sure how all this works. Maybe you did some SEO tests and drawn you conclusions but that doesnt means that it's universal, there too many variables IMO.

 

[G0D0VERY0U]

Unless you work at google, all this is your suppositions, not the truth. Nobody on this board knows for sure how all this works. Maybe you did some SEO tests and drawn you conclusions but that doesnt means that it's universal, there too many variables IMO.

Remember when I said that I'm not the only one with this information? It's in the patents.... Get out of your Hanna Montana gaming chair and put it a little work yourself to read the documents and look at the illustrations in the patents - I'm not here to walk you through it step by step, not my job and I definitely don't feel inclined to after your comment....

There are plenty of Jr VIP's that I've given links to the appropriate patents to. Of course, they didn't start off my interactions with them by telling me I was full of shit, so I guess you're up shit creek - go find them yourself.

 

[insider]

Lol you seem to be in a bad mood today mate, you should relax a bit ;-)

It was your ignorant supposition that I made it all up. Tasty foot?

Didnt made any supposition, asked a question ;-)

Anyway, thanks for the answer.

 

[cooooookies]

sorry sort of double post

 

[caroline42]

Nice one G0D0VERY0U I agree completely Started to rank my sites without link building! That's the real thing - no link building for hours, no bots, no hassles, no footprints, no ranking shuffels

 

[wolfmann]

In fact all these are about common sense and a lot of us lose it.

 

[SEOSage]

Inappropriate usage of any tool is going to harm you... As far as SB is concerned, I just love this and this is the only tool which I use frequently. Otherwise my all work is without any automation and I am quite successful in my approach

 

[cooooookies]

Thanks, godoveryou.

Really, this is indeed sort of annoying: people believing this is a 1+1 game despite the fact that many scientists, engineers, etc. are working for this multi-national company.

If you are a programmer or just technically educated, you can imagine what is possible and that dumb-ass link-spam might lead to nothing. And yes, I also believe in the power of patterns and strongly assume that big G will sooner or later exploit all possibilities which are technically possible. What I did not do - so much thanks! - think about are patents, muuuuch better than assumptions.

 

[rocket]

Total bullshit. You think google is going to determine serps straight off facebook and twitter? Backlinking is getting harder, not obsolete. How else besides off page seo is google going to gauge the popularity of a site? Backlinking will always be relevant to some degree.

i there, the man here.

Not going to get anybody riled up here. Just dropped by to say, "backlinking is dead". Stop wasting your time spamming blogs man. Instant and other algo. changes have killed all the benefit of backlinking. Pinging, FB, Twitter, and anything social is more effective than backlinking these days. You guys are behind the times. You bad boys/gals should know better. You are the type that ain't going to heaven so show some spine man! You are ashaming BH culture.

 

[ib6_ub9]

Matt Cutts specifically said backlinks from blog comments are not penalized because of the possibility of spamming with competitors links

I think google does a lot to mislead general public. My theory is that they sure know when there are 2 thousand posts on a stale blog posted 2 years ago and if you are there, they factor this in to your disadvantage.

 

[ib6_ub9]

Sent a thanks your way. Great thinking GODOVERYOU.

 

[Scritty]

Actually, dropping out of the SERPs almost immediately is a sign that the technique IS working because Google are reassessing where to position your site again.

Yup - this is correct.
It's an ever shuffling deck of cards. 99% of the time just carry on.

Use scrapebox on your web2.0 buffer/link sites more than your own.
A ring of hi ranking articles and web2.0 sites should surround your main site, preferably a structure for each keyword you are after.

Bollox these sites with links however you like. Google is never going to sandbox squidoo or ezine.

Scritty

 

[studentcashnow]

"backlinking is dead"

i love people like you. make sure you tell everyone

 

[mytony]

we can go around in circles with this debate but at the end of the day backlinks are still gonna be a factor in serps, they gotta be and i tried blasting my competitor with spammy backlinks 10,000 of em and it pushed me down 1 place as they got multiple pages on 1st page afterwards. my interpretation is lay off the pr0 backlinks and keep to pr3 or above and you shouldnt see any difference !

 

[rocket]

What Cutt's said is mostly true. Google will store the data and maybe build a "case" on you to establish a pattern for future algorithm improvement, but the worst that's going to happen is they just don't count the link.

THE ONLY SITUATION WHERE YOU WOULD GET DIRECTLY PENALIZED WOULD BE SPOOFING/FAKE REFERRER, CLOAKING, OR SOMETHING OF THAT NATURE THAT COULD BE DIRECTLY TRACED BACK TO YOU. CASE CLOSED.

 

[TheGarden]

Quick Update:
I think its important people get a follow up to these sorts of posts. I don't want to tempt fate but it seems 2 of my 6 sites have now hit first page for my main keywords. A couple of big keywords at no. 1. I can only guess the other sites will follow suit shortly!

Thanks everyone - all your comments have been much appreciated.

So in short: WOOHOO!!!

 

[ottoman]

Yes, Thanks for sharing

 

[aldragon]

Scrapebox on them.

I've seen other people post experiences where they've built a few hundred links in Scrapebox and now they're hitting No.1 for 10 keywords and making thousands of hits per day.

I've used it on 6 sites so far using slightly different methods on each to mix it up. But every single one has dropped out of the SERPS completely.

Has anyone had this happen to them? So far Scrapebox has been the touch of death to my sites!

I've read al the tips and watched the vids. I use private proxies for posting, mix the blogs up, high quality, etc.

I did get a boost in rankings for 3 of the sites but they dropped a couple of days later.

Sites are all 6-12 months old.

Ok here is a tip:

If you scrapebox the shit out of your websites that were ranked ok everytime you do a massive scraping be sure of 2 things.
1) after you scrape (ie. comment post) change all your metatags for something similar but not the definitive ones that you want to rank for.
2) point #1 includes Page title, page description and keywords (essentially the order of them)
you can say ty if you want to...

 

[mark0v]

I think google does a lot to mislead general public.

I also suspect that they patent concepts which they do not use, more likely for the purpose of preventing their competition from using those tactics, but if it throws off some blackhatters, all the better for them.