Is Zero-Redirect cloaking worth $500+/Month?

[DataMonk]

Hey guys,

Is paying for zero-redirect cloaking actually worth it for fbads?

Cloaking providers provide that in higher-tier plans, and those are expensive($500+ mo).

 

[mrjonezz]

I'm looking for a reliable meta cloaking service. i found some agencies, but charging 5k+ a month, excluding ad fees. it's stupid.

 

[Jenny 12]

Hey guys,

Is paying for zero-redirect cloaking actually worth it for fbads?

Cloaking providers provide that in higher-tier plans, and those are expensive($500+ mo).

This price is too high for cloacking services.

 

[ArtemisHuntress]

I know guys paying for expensive setups and still getting nowhere. The tool wasn't the problem

 

[medialounge]

Ot sure the algo won't still get caught up with that
Maybe you get a technical guy to give you a trial under 50 bucks first

 

[wolfofdevstreet]

cloakers are not cheap, but im pretty sure there are a couple of them offering trial version for 20-30 bucks

 

[TKV AGENCY]

There are many providers offering trial services at quite low prices.

 

[peptides1999]

There are many providers offering trial services at quite low prices.

can you name any?

 

[Waddup]

Meta requires pretty basic filters and most of their IPs are public info, 500 is nuts.

Now a days a decent tracker like Keitaro, Binom, Bemob etc have good filters and allow for bot filtering, blocking empty referral clicks, uploading your own IP list and in the end you will want to use a tracker always anyway.

 

[vaibhavdadhich74]

No, it is high-risk and not worth it.

 

[Reigarian]

Does anyone know any good providers of cloaking services and fb accounts? Looking for a specialist for a project
In the end, I didn't see any answers or recommendations in the thread

 

[betfull]

The best cloaker out there with reasonable pricing is cloakify cloud

 

[vanhien211]

Hey guys,

Is paying for zero-redirect cloaking actually worth it for fbads?

Cloaking providers provide that in higher-tier plans, and those are expensive($500+ mo).

It might seem a bit high, but the price reflects the quality.

 

[ParasiteSEO_]

Hey guys,

Is paying for zero-redirect cloaking actually worth it for fbads?

Cloaking providers provide that in higher-tier plans, and those are expensive($500+ mo).

there will be a charge of $500 per month only when the software is able to solve the problem of tracking or campaign through the use of metric. I will start with basic testing as a well-built funnel together with great creative work better than any expensive software.

 

[GrowthEngine]

No, it is high-risk and not worth it.
There are many providers offering trial services at quite low prices.

 

[Arise]

there will be a charge of $500 per month only when the software is able to solve the problem of tracking or campaign through the use of metric. I will start with basic testing as a well-built funnel together with great creative work better than any expensive software.

Agreed on starting basic, but you don't need to drop $500+ anymore for zero-redirect since newer platforms offer HTML content injection in their entry tiers now.

 

[Tissot Agency]

You could ask the provider for a one-week trial to check the quality first; I’ve noticed that account rental agencies often offer this service for free.

 

[Las Vegas]

I'm looking for a reliable meta cloaking service. i found some agencies, but charging 5k+ a month, excluding ad fees. it's stupid.

It's absurd that they would impose this on their users.

 

[Las Vegas]

You could ask the provider for a one-week trial to check the quality first; I’ve noticed that account rental agencies often offer this service for free.

What about your services?

 

[mehegi]

I spent too much of my budget on these high end systems in the past, assuming that there is some magic to them. the truth is, they all run the same technology behind the scenes. right now, i have a 30-40$ beginner system with TrafficSaviour using their zero-redirect system just working fine. save your money for buying better FB assets instead.