I stopped sending monthly keyword reports like two years ago because of this. most local business owners dont even know what a SERP is anyway and they definitely don't care about search volume. had a plumbing client last year who was ranking top 3 for a bunch of high volume terms but got zero calls because the search intent was off... he was furious.
@CloakCiphers now i just hook up call tracking and show them actual form fills and phone calls. if the phone rings they stay, if not they leave. makes retention much easier anyway when you talk their language.
Leads are what they pay for, no argument. But this thread is sliding toward "rankings are vanity" and that is the wrong lesson to take.
@The WP Nerd 's plumber is the proof. Top 3 for high-volume terms and zero calls is not rankings failing, it is ranking for the wrong words. Somebody chased "plumber" and "plumbing" because the volume looked big, when the calls live in "emergency plumber [suburb]" and "burst pipe repair [city]". Low volume, boring, but every one of those searches is a buyer. Rank those and the phone rings, which was the goal the whole time.
So I don't treat leads and rankings as opposites. I track rank on the 5 to 10 commercial-intent local terms that actually convert and ignore the rest. Those positions and the call volume move together. When they don't, the leak is on-page or the front desk, like the story above.
Where this bites for link people -> for local you do not need big DR or traffic to win those terms. One I help an agency with, an Ottawa plumber, sits at DR 43 with 1,818 visits a month but holds 39 keywords in the top 3, all local commercial terms. It ranks because the links and citations are geo and niche relevant, not because the numbers are large. Relevance is what the map pack rewards locally, and it is the cheap part most people skip.
Keep the keyword data in the background like the rest of the thread said. Just make sure the keywords you kept are the ones with money behind them.