Google will now be cloning your website?

[Steptoe]

This Google patent granted recently suggests that they could use their AI to create dynamically generated landing pages for ecom brands directly within the SERPs. These pages would mimic a brand's website but be customised based on the user's history/query.
https://patents.google.com/patent/US12536233B1/en

This is particularly concerning:

"In some instances, the AI-generated page can be presented to another organization that is different from the first organization."

So a page could be built from one brand's data and then served for queries for a competitor? Scary stuff.

 

[WickednDivine]

Patents often describe possibilities, not guaranteed rollouts , Google files tons of ideas that never go live.

This likely refers to AI-powered comparison or dynamic SERP experiences, not literally cloning one brand’s page for a competitor.

The bigger takeaway is that Google is keeping more of the shopping journey inside search , so brand strength and first-party data will matter even more going forward.

 

[HenryObi]

This Google patent granted recently suggests that they could use their AI to create dynamically generated landing pages for ecom brands directly within the SERPs. These pages would mimic a brand's website but be customised based on the user's history/query.

When a visitor/user makes a purchase from this Google generated page, where does it go?

 

[PHPInjected]

So a page could be built from one brand's data and then served for queries for a competitor? Scary stuff.

There has to be a way to circumvent such things.

This would, in effect, kill most sellers at levels that are non-corporate.

 

[Starblazer]

Google is trying since years to be a shopping mall. The users can find, compare, read reviews, and select products in Google and then visit the site for purchase. Youtube might do the same by giving overview of all product reviews so that users need not watch individual reviews.

 

[megakim]

Patents dont mean rollout tomorrow. Google files tons of ideas that never go live.

Still smart to build strong brand so users search you direct not just generic queries.

 

[Ben Arthur]

That is concerning. If Google starts generating pages like that, it could blur the line between original content and AI-created SERP pages. Brands might get traffic copied or redirected without control, and competing sites could potentially benefit from each other’s data. It adds a new layer of risk for ecom SEO.

 

[SMM Vero]

patents always sound scarier than reality.

google patents tons of ideas that never get fully rolled out. this sounds more like dynamic SERP enhancement than “stealing brand A’s content for brand B.”

the line about serving it to another organization doesn’t automatically mean they’ll swap competitor traffic around. more likely it’s about flexible rendering or aggregated info.

if google ever built pages that confuse brand intent, user satisfaction would tank. and that’s the one thing they care about most.

interesting patent, yes. apocalypse for ecom, probably not.

 

[dvc]

When a visitor/user makes a purchase from this Google generated page, where does it go?

I'm your competition, I'm running ads. Google will suggest I use one of their 20% converting lps (yours cloned).

Might start building shitty ass ux pages. Garbage in, garbage out.

 

[Darkmancer]

Yeah, it's a wild patent for sure. The part about serving it to a competitor is the real nightmare fuel . Still just a patent, but it shows where their head's at—complete loss of brand control if it ever rolls out.

 

[Steptoe]

Patents often describe possibilities, not guaranteed rollouts , Google files tons of ideas that never go live.

Patents dont mean rollout tomorrow. Google files tons of ideas that never go live.

google patents tons of ideas that never get fully rolled out.

And they file plenty that do.

This likely refers to AI-powered comparison or dynamic SERP experiences, not literally cloning one brand’s page for a competitor.

Clickbait title but the patent still suggests that one brand's site can become an asset for AI to train on that could instead give visibility to a competitor.

I'm your competition, I'm running ads. Google will suggest I use one of their 20% converting lps (yours cloned).

Might start building shitty ass ux pages. Garbage in, garbage out.

In some age-brackets, geos, and niches, the shit mid-2000s UX sales pages are the ones that convert the best

 

[HenryObi]

I'm your competition, I'm running ads. Google will suggest I use one of their 20% converting lps (yours cloned).

That is insane!

This should be criminal if we're being honest.

 

[Marco69]

For me it sounds like the Amazon model; you have your logo, domain, brand name all on that google AI copy site (whatsoever the name will be) but google is (like amazon) the owner of the product and they will use the payout model like ebay's Management payment (likje amazone does too) .

Google biggest zionism kraken in the world, they control and take your serp listings.

They have strict Rules if EEAT for you as a Google News Publisher - these rules will come next to you fo rthe normal default organic seo results too.

Goggle forbids you to be active in some niches (health, politics and more) when you not have the right certificate.

Google will forbid you to have multiple domains for your content (videos on different domain, audio podcasts on different domains, etc,etc...) you shopuld have all one onto your 1 domain site., the same wihen you have a little shop.

Google steals your content (some format of content not all) to show them as AI answers.

Google does rank good quality journalism content higher in the default organic search results

Google shutdown your domain your whole site when you not frame conspiracy and controversial content the right way

Google gives broad topics (keywords) main traffic to big sites and big media sites who are in thesame club (wef) their friends not to you

Big sites, media sites can steal your traffic and content without get any consequences

Google will give only their friends (wef) the right to have multiple domains, there cross posting same content (not all to 100% but around 20%) give them the rights top post about politics, controversial, health, pharma ,medicine and much more- you not

Google will seo ranking down websites who have their business model based on email newsletter list...so you will be forced to use social media to get any traffic to build a email list.

Google will change dramatical the whole seo organic landscape into commercial (you have to pay for that ranking) it will stop showing normal non commercial content.

Bing will be the execution here but it has only 10% of the traffic volume google has.

Not think I be a pessimist never ever, but these are my thoughts now - it's something like:
I hear the devil's soft footsteps in my apartment... (the devil is lurking around my house)

These thoughts now here coming not with closed eyes meditation I have my eyes open, my mind the film around google and rules and whamm, these thoughts coming up in front of my eyes, they are form the unconscious mind. OK, unconscious mind answers are not 100% correct maybe more like 70-80%.

But my message to you Blackhatworld people is; Be aware and have always a Plan B for your online business!

 

[JuvonAng]

patents are always scary

 

[BitBrowser 1]

This patent sounds scary at first, but I wouldn’t freak out. Google patents all sorts of wild stuff that may never actually happen. The “give competitor’s page to someone else” line? Probably not literal. More likely they mean showing a mix of info from multiple brands in one AI‑generated SERP snippet. Could suck for traffic though, because clicks might stay on Google instead of going to your site.

Keep an eye on it, but don’t assume Google is straight up stealing your pages. It’s more about them trying to keep users inside search.

 

[Fainaboy]

Online businesses are getting harder and harder.

 

[Topfrim]

Yes, the patent sounds scary at first, but it’s important to remember that a patent doesn’t mean Google will fully implement it. The idea described in US12536233B1 is that Google could generate a personalized landing page when the original page doesn’t meet the user’s needs. The system evaluates signals like CTR, bounce rate, conversion performance, and overall page quality. If the page performs poorly, Google may generate an AI-assembled version tailored to the user’s query and history.

Regarding the concern about showing a page built from one brand’s data to another organization: patents often include broad scenarios, and it doesn’t necessarily mean Google will deploy it exactly that way. The bigger takeaway for SEOs is clear future SEO won’t just be about rankings, but about high-quality, structured landing pages that AI systems can’t easily “improve.” If your content is strong, well-structured, and satisfies intent, there’s far less reason for Google to replace it.

 

[satyr85]

I bet this may be used somewhere in the future for AdWords. AI generated sales page per user.

 

[Uuron Agency]

This Google patent granted recently suggests that they could use their AI to create dynamically generated landing pages for ecom brands directly within the SERPs. These pages would mimic a brand's website but be customised based on the user's history/query.
https://patents.google.com/patent/US12536233B1/en

This is particularly concerning: So a page could be built from one brand's data and then served for queries for a competitor? Scary stuff.

his may allow top-ranking websites to reach customers more easily, while users can access key information and products directly on the search engine before deciding to visit the site.

 

[MartinLutherKingjr]

This Google patent granted recently suggests that they could use their AI to create dynamically generated landing pages for ecom brands directly within the SERPs. These pages would mimic a brand's website but be customised based on the user's history/query.
https://patents.google.com/patent/US12536233B1/en

This is particularly concerning: So a page could be built from one brand's data and then served for queries for a competitor? Scary stuff.

If Google starts auto-creating pages like that, it blurs the line between real site content and search results. Brands could lose control of their traffic while competitors benefit from their data, creating new problems for e-commerce SEO.

I'm your competition, I'm running ads. Google will suggest I use one of their 20% converting lps (yours cloned).

Might start building shitty ass ux pages. Garbage in, garbage out.

Sounds like the game could flip. If Google starts pushing cloned high-converting landing pages, competitors might just feed the system bad UX pages on purpose.