⭐️⭐️⭐️ INSIDE A $4.1M FACEBOOK AD ACCOUNT ✅✅✅ (HERE’S WHAT’S WORKING)

Trackwat

BANNED
Joined
Jan 29, 2023
Messages
605
Reaction score
97
Good day

My goal with this post is to demonstrate that a complicated ad account structure is not necessary to scale your Facebook ads.

Here's a look inside at what's working for a DTC Brand's Facebook ad account, which has spent $4,170,728.55 in ad spend.

1) SIMPLE AD ACCOUNT STRUCTURE

You cannot get much simpler than having just one CBO campaign.

This campaign has:

Prospecting ads (Top of the funnel)

Retargeting ads (Middle of the funnel & bottom of the funnel) -

Offer ads.

How does the campaign scale? By increasing the budget for the whole campaign. You don't need to duplicate the campaign to scale your ad account.

Often, when you overcomplicate the ad account structure by duplicating and scaling, you end up encountering audience overlap, resulting in increased CPM and CPA as you reach the same audience you previously targeted with your campaigns.

We made the mistake of duplicate scaling years ago, and since 2022, we have stuck to increasing the budget for the campaign.

Looking at the first screenshot, you can see that the campaign has recorded 262,000 purchases; it can't fail due to the vast amount of data. That should be the campaign's goal: to make as many purchases as possible while meeting your CPA goal.

The more purchases the campaign has, the better it will perform over time. Now let's jump into creative testing.

2) SIMPLE TESTING SYSTEM.

Here is how the ad account looks on the ad set level with the setup:

Broad targeting. (Targeting is handled by creatives, especially given the amount of data their ad account contains)

1 Concept per Ad Set, with 3-5 unique ad variations of each concept.

Each week we test 4-6 ad concepts.

We don't miss a single week without testing new ad concepts.

Here are the testing rules:

Each ad set runs for 7 days

A winning ad will have a CPA below the target + will record 100+ purchases during 7 days.

A losing ad will have a small spend over a 7-day period.

A losing ad will have a CPA above the target.

It's crucial to measure AOV right beside the CPA, because at times your ads can exceed CPA targets and, at the same time, bring in higher-quality customers who spend more, thus generating higher AOV.

3) HERO OFFER & HERO PRODUCT.

This brand has a simple Hero offer that we use to acquire customers at scale. Having a HERO offer and a great product is the easiest way to scale a brand.

Many businesses have scaled into tens of millions in revenue just because of having a HERO offer alone.

A HERO offer not only attracts new clients but also helps in retaining them by delivering exceptional value.

I highy suggest doing competitor research in your own niche or similar niches and look at what kind of HERO offers the best brands have.

Many people think that offering a 20% discount on the first purchase is a HERO offer. It's not.

Examples of great HERO offers:

Buy 1, get on 1 FREE

Buy 2, get one FREE

BUY 3, GET a (popular product) as a gift.

4) A SIMPLE BUYERS JOURNEY.

This brand's conversion is through the roof, simply because of the simplicity of the website.

Easy to read

Easy to understand

Few clicks to a purchase.

I often see extremely complicated websites that ultimately have a low conversion rate.

Once a potential customer lands on the website, they must understand exactly what you're selling within the first few seconds; otherwise, you'll have a high bounce rate which will ultimately result in a low conversion rate, as the majority of visitors leave.

5) SUMMARY

Focus on what truly matters - your HERO offer and your customer's buyer journey, and simplify your advertising system.

It should not be complicated. The complicated you make it the harder it will be to scale.

There is a reason why there is a saying, "Simplicity scales complexity fails."

Thanks for reading.
 
Refreshing positivity amongst the doom.
Thanks. To be fair, the end of June till the end of August is pretty bad for e-commerce. We also have two accounts that have tanked during this period.
 
We’ve been having trouble for a while to even get higher than our breakeven ROAS which is 1.4, we’ve tried so many things, different creatives, different price points, different ad structure, interests, audiences, asc+, but we just can not go higher. There was a period in late May to early June where we averaged ROAS of 1.8 for around 30 days but then everything went back to around 1.4, sometimes I just get so discouraged. Any tips?
 
We’ve been having trouble for a while to even get higher than our breakeven ROAS which is 1.4, we’ve tried so many things, different creatives, different price points, different ad structure, interests, audiences, asc+, but we just can not go higher. There was a period in late May to early June where we averaged ROAS of 1.8 for around 30 days but then everything went back to around 1.4, sometimes I just get so discouraged. Any tips?

It could be an issue with the product/service not being in demand enough. Landing page issues. Business numbers / cost to fulfill is too high to make FB ads work. There are a lot of factors.
 
This is great. I think further value to this community would be to outline if the same strategy would work on smaller ad daily spends i.e less than $100.

I assume a similar approach but with longer timeframes in new creation injection and analysis, but I think the majority of users here aren’t spending £15K per day and it’s a different ball game at those levels
Also, what about multi product brands — eg a shoe brand with multiple bestsellers, say 3 with similar AOV profile, would you still stick to 1 campaign structure in this case and maybe separate streamlined campaigns for other AOV profiles?
 
This is great. I think further value to this community would be to outline if the same strategy would work on smaller ad daily spends i.e less than $100.

I assume a similar approach but with longer timeframes in new creation injection and analysis, but I think the majority of users here aren’t spending £15K per day and it’s a different ball game at those levels
Also, what about multi product brands — eg a shoe brand with multiple bestsellers, say 3 with similar AOV profile, would you still stick to 1 campaign structure in this case and maybe separate streamlined campaigns for other AOV profiles?
Typically fashion brands even have a 1 clear best-seller. Focus on scaling the best seller. You don't need to focus on three. Make sure one is working that already is hard, once the campaign for the best selling product is doing really well only then add the second one.
 
Wait, this is over a year. That means some of these ads have been running all year? Very everygreen. Good to know! Thanks!

Are you running any exclusions? For example All customers who have purchased in the past?
Yeah there are many ads that are running for a year and still performing.We do 30 day customer exclusion.
 
Large accounts are always easier to optimize because you get more data. For SMBs with much smaller budgets, often times they just don’t get enough optimization events to get consistent results.
 
Large accounts are always easier to optimize because you get more data. For SMBs with much smaller budgets, often times they just don’t get enough optimization events to get consistent results.
This brand started last year. I'm going to create a post about how the spend increased month on month and what was done to overcome bottlenecks.
 
How do we cut the bots off? 46% bots is wild and it shouldn’t be something anyone is okay with.
 
How do we cut the bots off? 46% bots is wild and it shouldn’t be something anyone is okay with.
As I said, let's call it bad traffic. You need to watch closely from where your traffic is coming and if it's converting. I don't care about 5% of bot/bad traffic. But when it's 46%, you better see it.
 
I can clearly tell you didn’t use AI to write this. Amazing post. Saving this and will try to implement this strategy. Could I please ask if changing current campaigns is better or starting new ones ? My experience with new campaigns hasn’t been great.


I would definitely replace underperforming campaigns and reallocate the budget towards new campaigns. Keep the ones that are performing. (And use manual targeting). Definitely let me know how it goes :)
 
This post is great.

Thank you very much.

It was so refreshing and inspiring to read your work.

Let me share two questions with you:

  • Where can I find good sales letters? Yours sound like they would be even better.
  • Which copywriters do you admire the most? I'd love to get some inspiration.
Hey man glad you feel that way. And thanks for reading. Happy you found value.

Good sales letters are plenty… you can search the web for Clayton Makepeace, Halbert, Carlton… There’s also the older guys: Eugene Schwartz, Robert Collier… there’s too many to name. Get into a few and then it’s a rabbit hole.

My personal favorite is Bill Boner (Agora), he’s a bit underground, but if you dig deeper you’ll find a lot of his material… especially from the early International Living days.
 
Back
Top