AI blogging

[contact_yeasin]

what do you think about AI blogging especially AI auto blogging?
- Is it worth?
- is it really works?
- what problems does it really face?
- is it a futuristic option or will it die after google update?

 

[tazarbm]

some people (@itz_styx ... @Steptoe) say that it still works, so I don't know, maybe they can confirm...

- is it a futuristic option or will it die after google update?

it's more like an old method, not a futuristic one

 

[AiMarketerPro]

it wont work ))

 

[itz_styx]

people who say it doesn't work probably never tried, or maybe once, failed and moved on. there are countless people who have success with it, but its like with everything you have to do it right. how many are there who create content manually and still fail? AI content isn't any different than normal content. its just about how good your prompts are. if you just write "create me a blog article about X" of course its not working as well as if you give very specific linguistic instructions.
and as for google, no they dont give AI content a penalty as long as its useful. its even in their terms that they don't care HOW content is created, as long as it is useful to the user.

 

[SEO JOKER]

what do you think about AI blogging especially AI auto blogging?
- Is it worth?
- is it really works?
- what problems does it really face?
- is it a futuristic option or will it die after google update?

AI blogging and auto blogging can work, but only when you use them wisely. They are great for speed and generating ideas, but fully automated posts often end up low quality, repetitive, and hard to index. Google will not ban AI content, but it will push down anything that looks mass produced. The real future is AI assisted content with human editing and real expertise, not 100% auto generated blogs.

 

[india]

AI auto-blogging works for scale and speed but struggles with thin, generic content that Google deprioritizes post-2025 updates.

Worth it for drafts/ideas if heavily human-edited for EEAT, uniqueness, and engagement.

AI Auto Blogging Problems: inaccuracies, lack of personality/depth, plagiarism flags.

Hybrid human-AI is futuristic; unedited auto-blogging will sooner or later will be dead.

 

[omi3oh1]

AI autoblogging can work but it’s getting harder every day.

 

[ctwuzrxd]

The question is do you have a better prompt or AI to create superior posts because the competition is high with all these AI

 

[pillorpbn]

AI autoblogging can work, but only if you add editing, structure and real value-pure raw AI spam dies fast. It's worth it for scaling content, but the biggest issues are footprint, duplicate patterns, and low-engagement pages. It won't die, but lazy AI sites will; only well-optimized, human-touched AI projects will survive future Google updates.

 

[Steptoe]

what do you think about AI blogging especially AI auto blogging?
- Is it worth?
- is it really works?
- what problems does it really face?
- is it a futuristic option or will it die after google update?

some people (@itz_styx ... @Steptoe) say that it still works, so I don't know, maybe they can confirm...


it's more like an old method, not a futuristic one

The content on such sites is pretty much the smallest piece of the puzzle - the heavy lifting comes from the domain it's on, and the external signals you can send to the site/content. Trying to fill a new domain with vanilla-prompt AI-generated blog posts is going to fail in 99% of cases.

 

[Vorkleck]

AI blogging will not work because Google will detect it and penalize the site

 

[seoforever1]

what do you think about AI blogging especially AI auto blogging?
- Is it worth?
- is it really works?
- what problems does it really face?
- is it a futuristic option or will it die after google update?

It cannot make a blog survive for long term. May be in short term , you can make some money.

 

[Seo Captain]

what do you think about AI blogging especially AI auto blogging?
- Is it worth?
- is it really works?
- what problems does it really face?
- is it a futuristic option or will it die after google update?

If you have some unique tool that only you have access to , then good results might be possible. But if you think you can make autoblog with chatgpt content and make lots of money, that is never happening.

 

[Alen Simon]

AI blogging can work, but only when a human shapes and checks the content. Fully automated posts usually feel generic and won’t hold up long term. Google isn’t against ai, but it favors helpful, genuine writing, so AI only sites tend to fade. The real future is using ai as support, not as a replacement.

 

[Misteriozi]

It won't be successful

 

[Ali005]

AI blogging can be worth it, but only when it’s guided by a human touch. It works for speed and ideas, but pure auto blogging usually struggles with depth, originality and long term trust. Most issues come from low quality content, repetition and lack of real insight. It won’t die, but google updates will keep pushing it toward higher quality, human edited use instead of set and forget automation.

 

[Venusaur]

it worked 3 years ago or something like that
nowadays it's just waste of time

 

[contact_yeasin]

Thank you everyone for your kind and detailed responses. it really helped me a lot.

 

[scrivimelo]

Not a fan of auto blogging, but AI can be used for blogging in a lot of steps, to make search, organize data, write some part of the article or just asking help to have the chapters lists...so in my opinion if you want to use AI to don't do nothing maybe is a waste of time, but if you want to use AI to save time I didn't see any negative aspects.

 

[savitaprasad]

what do you think about AI blogging especially AI auto blogging?
- Is it worth?
- is it really works?
- what problems does it really face?
- is it a futuristic option or will it die after google update?

Time waste. AI is good for research and other tasks. But do not use AI content as it is on own blogs.