Moderator and members, I want to respond clearly to the accusations here. First, the private message I sent on BHW was only to confirm communication, not to finalize or guarantee any deal. The claimant assumes that this equals a contract, but that’s not how it works. Second, regarding the $320 USDT payment, there is no solid evidence that the wallet address he used actually belongs to me. A blockchain link only shows that money moved between two addresses, not that one of them is mine. Without direct and undeniable proof that I control that wallet, the claim simply doesn’t connect me to the transaction. Third, the claimant himself admits that most of the Telegram conversation was deleted, and he does not have screenshots of the key parts where an agreement or promise of delivery would have been made. That means there is no complete record of what was actually said, only his version of events. Fourth, he says I blocked him, but again, there is no screenshot to confirm this. And while he claims he waited, the 48-hour dispute process was not properly respected before opening this thread.
Now, why would he accuse me without strong evidence? The answer seems clear: because he made a risky transaction using cryptocurrency, which by nature cannot be reversed, and now that he regrets his decision or lost money elsewhere, he is looking for someone to blame in order to recover his loss. Instead of accepting responsibility for using a payment method with no buyer protection, he is trying to shift that responsibility onto me. This is not a fair use of the Dispute system, it is an attempt to use the moderators as leverage to undo his own mistake.
Finally, this complaint is focused more on getting me banned than on actually resolving a real issue. According to the rules, if the focus shifts from resolution to punishment, the dispute should not be valid. For all these reasons, lack of solid proof, missing evidence, and the claimant’s own motives, the accusations against me do not stand.
Respectfully,
dondondon5
Your entire defense collapses under its own contradictions. Here’s why:
1.BHW PM was not “just communication.”
You claim the private message on BHW didn’t finalize a deal. But in that DM, I confirmed the TG address you gave me " t.me/leavedomdom ", and that’s exactly where the transaction continued. This wasn’t some random impersonator; it was your official contact link in your signature.
2.The $320 wallet address did come from you.
You argue there’s no proof the wallet belongs to you. But that address was given to me in TG chat. True, when you blocked me you also cleared the chat, so that single message is gone. However, I confirmed the product, the price, and the recipient address again in BHW DM at 10:08 UTC, and at 10:10:09 UTC, just two minutes later, I completed the payment.
If you hadn’t given me that address, it would have been impossible to confirm and pay in just two minutes. The “missing record” exists only because you blocked and wiped the chat.
3.You were online but silent.
After I confirmed and paid, you were online but gave no reply. If this were a misunderstanding, you could have clarified right then. Silence at that moment says everything.
4.Proof of blocking.
You deny blocking me, but I have a screenshot clearly showing that I was blocked by the account I contacted through your signature link. Right after this, you removed your signature from BHW. Innocent people don’t rush to delete evidence, guilty people do.
5.The 48-hour claim is false.
You say I didn’t respect the 48hours dispute process. In reality, I kept trying to contact you during that period, but you cut off all communication by blocking me. You are the one who prevented dialogue.
6.Your shifting stories expose you.
When I contacted you from another TG account, you said it was a “similar username” that scammed me. Later, you admitted it was your TG account but claimed you blocked me because I “cursed” you. Which is it? You can’t have it both ways. Your excuses change depending on what’s convenient in the moment.
Conclusion
This isn’t about “buyer’s remorse” or blaming crypto risk. If that were the case, why would I single out you, out of all sellers? Because the evidence chain is clear and unbroken:
BHW PM → your signature TG → confirmation → payment two minutes later → no response while online → block → deleted signature.
That entire chain points directly to you.
$320 is nothing to me, but your BHW account and reputation are everything. And that is what you’re about to lose for scamming.
