codePerformance
Registered Member
- Jan 15, 2014
- 91
- 27
As we all know, the primary problem and limiting factor for our industry is traffic.
In the past 20 years I saw an increasing monopolization of traffic while the possibilities to get traffic via SEO, Email-Marketing, Social-Media are going down as well due more and more (community) guideline enforcing.
All in all it's a very serious development which makes the silicon valley scumbags richer while the rest of the world gets poorer.
Then I remembered myself of the early days of the internet while every website has a "Links"-Section where other websites of the same niche was linked to. This simple practice gave every participant a fair share of targeted visitors independent from a third party. Unfortunately, these lists had to be maintained manually and it could take a while till a webmaster adds, deletes or updates a link.
What if a web-project serves that particular purpose? It creates a niche relevant list (up to 5 links) for every website. These links a getting updated after a certain time, when a better matching website was found. All links will have the rel="nofollow" attribute to NOT interfere your SEO-rankings.
To embed the list into your website, javascript with .htaccess server invocation would be used (to prevent ad-blockers). The more prominent the list is placed like header, side-bar, footer (detectable via javascript) the more views take place which increases the chances of better and more views on other websites. But this is only a secondary factor, the primary factor is the niche relevancy.
The aim here is not to improve the SERPs of the websites, but to create an alternative traffic route to your website. SERPs are overrated anyway due search engines cannot scale due only the top 5 results get all the traffic while the rest gets nothing. With this approach, the number of link spots scales according to the number of websites.
What's your opinion?
In the past 20 years I saw an increasing monopolization of traffic while the possibilities to get traffic via SEO, Email-Marketing, Social-Media are going down as well due more and more (community) guideline enforcing.
All in all it's a very serious development which makes the silicon valley scumbags richer while the rest of the world gets poorer.
Then I remembered myself of the early days of the internet while every website has a "Links"-Section where other websites of the same niche was linked to. This simple practice gave every participant a fair share of targeted visitors independent from a third party. Unfortunately, these lists had to be maintained manually and it could take a while till a webmaster adds, deletes or updates a link.
What if a web-project serves that particular purpose? It creates a niche relevant list (up to 5 links) for every website. These links a getting updated after a certain time, when a better matching website was found. All links will have the rel="nofollow" attribute to NOT interfere your SEO-rankings.
To embed the list into your website, javascript with .htaccess server invocation would be used (to prevent ad-blockers). The more prominent the list is placed like header, side-bar, footer (detectable via javascript) the more views take place which increases the chances of better and more views on other websites. But this is only a secondary factor, the primary factor is the niche relevancy.
The aim here is not to improve the SERPs of the websites, but to create an alternative traffic route to your website. SERPs are overrated anyway due search engines cannot scale due only the top 5 results get all the traffic while the rest gets nothing. With this approach, the number of link spots scales according to the number of websites.
What's your opinion?
Last edited: