Status
Not open for further replies.
Review Updated.

Disappointed with Unreliable Service and False Promises.

The seller promptly posted a backlink to my website on Wikipedia as part of the review process.

At first, I was impressed and promptly left a glowing review, praising the speed of service and flexibility in link placement. However, my satisfaction was short-lived. On the same day, the link to my website mysteriously vanished from Wikipedia.

Concerned, I reached out to the seller, expecting a swift resolution as per their guarantee.
Unfortunately, what followed was a series of broken promises and excuses. Despite assuring me that the issue would be rectified promptly, the seller failed to deliver.

View attachment 332837

Thank you.
I appriciate your concern, see my IP has been blocked, and your seat was a free review copy. I tried and it was successfully completed. But after sometime wikipedia removed the linked and blocked my IP.

I already tried so many time. And I told you I will replace it just give me time, but you didn't. You can see our conversation.

Sorry to disappointing you.

1711607014032.png
 
I appriciate your concern, see my IP has been blocked, and your seat was a free review copy. I tried and it was successfully completed. But after sometime wikipedia removed the linked and blocked my IP.

I already tried so many time. And I told you I will replace it just give me time, but you didn't. You can see our conversation.

Sorry to disappointing you.

View attachment 332843
A review copy is not free. You are exchanging a product for a *genuine* review. This doesn't mean that a reviewer should receive an inferior service or support in a level that is different than other paying members.

Updating his review is his obligation in this case, because otherwise it would have been misleading.
 
A review copy is not free. You are exchanging a product for a *genuine* review. This doesn't mean that a reviewer should receive an inferior service or support in a level that is different than other paying members.

Updating his review is his obligation in this case, because otherwise it would have been misleading.
That review copy is totally free. He didn't pay me. But I did support him and took sometimes from him.

But all of a sudden he just gave me an alligation.

I didn't tell him that I won't give him support or won't give the replace link.

Does he have proof?
 
That review copy is totally free. He didn't pay me. But I did support him and took sometimes from him.

But all of a sudden he just gave me an alligation.

I didn't tell him that I won't give him support or won't give the replace link.

Does he have proof?
***********
I am bound by the rules to not hijack your thread, so this would be my last comment here.
***********

The user didn't pay with money, but with time. He's also obligated to post an honest review, and he might've received an infraction for not correcting his review, especially if other buyers were complaining in your thread.
His proof was a screenshot of your conversation.

I'll finish by saying that I came here originally as an interested buyer.
 
***********
I am bound by the rules to not hijack your thread, so this would be my last comment here.
***********

The user didn't pay with money, but with time. He's also obligated to post an honest review, and he might've received an infraction for not correcting his review, especially if other buyers were complaining in your thread.
His proof was a screenshot of your conversation.

I'll finish by saying that I came here originally as an interested buyer.
I respect your comment.

I gave him my service before TAT. And it was removed by wikipedia and I took time to replace it.

I didn’t break any rules. But I need time to replace it. I also respect his time.
 
The sales thread was closed as the member requested a refund of their membership.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top