I like it when I buy a lifetime license, then the provider removes all the license tiers from public sale and proceeds to replace all the tiers with a single enterprise tier (the only tier being sold on their sales page publicly) which isn't available to the lifetime license buyers.
Before, any subscription fee was just to get the latest updates - but would not be locked out of the software if you stopped updating, you could freely continue using the older versions.
Simply removing the tiers, making a new single 'tier' and excluding the lifetime buyers is entirely against the spirit of a lifetime license (under the previous arrangement, we would have still needed to pay to upgrade versions). There is no purpose to tiers if you only offer one tier.
I would have been happy to see Ubot being revived if the lifetime license buyers weren't being shafted. I think the seller is underestimating the value of having a community of satisfied buyers, it really is some of the best long term marketing you can have. It is not a meme.
Despite it's flaws and some very buggy release versions (often using the older major version was the best choice), the tool has been extremely useful to me over the years and I don't regret buying it ~10 years ago. I do regret buying the Developer tier though. I bought Ubot because I saw it recommended by several users here on BHW.
I will go into detail later, but FYI they didn't ban the SethTurin who opened the account on here in 2011 or who had the sales thread in 2012
Ahh wow ok, this is starting to make sense now.
I'm speculating that the refund requested in this dispute could be somewhat related to the same grievances I have with the tiers being replaced.
Judging from the attitude of the new person running this software I'm seeing in this thread, I doubt they have the ability to introspect and consider the possibility that perhaps how they are handling this situation, this refund and lifetime buyers in general could have been the wrong strategy. I believe I've seen this kind of attitude before and it's impossible to reason with. I'd welcome being proven wrong though, I do believe in redemption and learning from mistakes. I'd like to propose considering letting 'Seth' back if he agrees to look after the lifetime buyers (and issue this refund, if it is still wanted) under the original agreement without any bait/switch games with tiers or price hikes on the regular updates cost. From the attitude I've seen in this thread though, I doubt he'd be able to humble himself if the offer was even on the table.
It is likely the community has dodged a bullet with this being blocked from sale.