Game Dev Market ban AI generated assets

[bytebandit]

For those planning to sell AI generated game assets, those marketplaces are already making a move.

Post: https://www.gamedevmarket.net/news/a-further-update-on-ai-assets-on-gdm/

 

[Waifu_tatyana]

Good. It's high time these AI spam losers are kicked out of all communities.

 

[bytebandit]

Good. It's high time these AI spam losers are kicked out of all communities.

It doesn't necessarily need to be spam, good assets are being rejected too. Doesn't matter the quality. A human asset won't be always good quality as well as an AI asset. I think that a marketplace shouldn't put their hands into what is ethical or not, they argue that is to protect the regular human asset creators. It's a marketplace or a charity?

 

[FromAfrica]

Good or bad, I think the AI has come to stay. My we never loose our job, work or business to AI disruption

 

[Uncle Muriko]

How will they distinguish?

 

[Waifu_tatyana]

It doesn't necessarily need to be spam, good assets are being rejected too. Doesn't matter the quality. A human asset won't be always good quality as well as an AI asset. I think that a marketplace shouldn't put their hands into what is ethical or not, they argue that is to protect the regular human asset creators. It's a marketplace or a charity?

Let's be honest. 90% of those using AI in these niches are generating pure spam to make a quick buck. People can detect good assets from bad ones so I am not concerned about that. There's blackhat, then there's pure shithat. I consider AI spammers to be shithatters (not talking about the ones who use AI to still bring something new to the table but that's few and far between).
Look at the number of dumb retards who've sprung up in the blogging sector after ChatGPT.

 

[bytebandit]

How will they distinguish?

Currently, GDM just looks at the asset and it they see irregularities they ask you first and if no response they ban your assets in a week or so.

Let's be honest. 90% of those using AI in these niches are generating pure spam to make a quick buck. People can detect good assets from bad ones so I am not concerned about that. There's blackhat, then there's pure shithat. I consider AI spammers to be shithatters (not talking about the ones who use AI to still bring something new to the table but that's few and far between).
Look at the number of dumb retards who've sprung up in the blogging sector after ChatGPT.

Sure, as you mention there is a bunch of spammers, but that is not necessarily related to AI, the core issue here is that marketplaces not only GDM are banning by the source, doesn't matter if it's spam or not, they even mention that if you spent time and did manual work but you just used AI your asset won't be accepted.

 

[N1ckG2]

For those planning to sell AI generated game assets, those marketplaces are already making a move.

Post: https://www.gamedevmarket.net/news/a-further-update-on-ai-assets-on-gdm/

What you can do instead is build ai powered app or game. AI ludo game, a chess alike or anything you can compete with ai or learn dlfrom it or parneter with ai bots could a viral game or app. Also you can ride the wave with ai powered tools for almost anything that you can automate. A fiendnof mine built ai powered seo tool and it is trending now on our local market with no competition and great results. You guy can make a lot of money with apps and games without ban ans spam.

 

[Nikolaos]

It doesn't necessarily need to be spam, good assets are being rejected too. Doesn't matter the quality. A human asset won't be always good quality as well as an AI asset. I think that a marketplace shouldn't put their hands into what is ethical or not, they argue that is to protect the regular human asset creators. It's a marketplace or a charity?

Yes but are you sure that A.I. products can't be made superior to those of a real human?

 

[SocialManager]

I am not familiar with this marketplace, but I think probably a good solution is to offer a paid tier for high end designers that use AI, so they are not just flooding the market with low quality or low effort things. AI is inevitable you can't just ban it, eventually we will have no way to distinguish between AI and other work.

 

[bytebandit]

Yes but are you sure that A.I. products can't be made superior to those of a real human?

About quality level, really depends on technology, currently, humans can reach better work than AI, but the relation of quality/time is incredibly better with AI.

As you get a professional result in just minutes with a curated prompt. In my experience in that marketplace, AI can create better raw assets than 90% of the static assets from that site. I point "raw assets" cause most of the time you need to curate the content, crop the results and organise the content but all the designing part is done by the AI.

I am not familiar with this marketplace, but I think probably a good solution is to offer a paid tier for high end designers that use AI, so they are not just flooding the market with low quality or low effort things. AI is inevitable you can't just ban it, eventually we will have no way to distinguish between AI and other work.

They currently control flooding manually as they used to do before AI, with low-quality content. IMO they don't need to change the current process.
Agree with you in the last part, it's inevitable.