I read your post. I agree with it not going to slow down now. However, governments have a lot to lose in simply allowing it to happen this way, since they will have no answer for the amount of people getting fucked by this technology. What are they gonna do if people start losing jobs in mass and demand a solution for it?
Keep in mind that we have jobs for almost everyone and we still have a lot of people living in poverty. In my country, the average salary is around 800 euros. That's what would cost you renting a very cheap apartment. Now imagine people start losing jobs left and right. I don't see how governments can possibly allow that.
They can't slow down the development of these technologies, but they can absolutely ban them from behind used in the job market. Lets not forget they forced the entire society to stay at home for months. Banning ChatGPT and similar tech would be nothing in comparision. They can and will probably do it. If it's right or wrong, that's another conversation. Same with if they would be successful or not. But the attempt will probably happen.
But if something doesn't provide society with positive results, and rather starts pushing people towards unemployment and poverty, wouldn't the governments be right to stop it? Usually people ask their government to fight anything that harms them. The government is there to protect its people.
One good example is a few countries not allowing foreigners to buy houses there, because that drives prices up and the natives stop having the ability to find a place to live. That's happening in my country and a lot of people are asking for the government to stop purchases from foreigners. We have single bedrooms being rented for over 1000 euros a month. That's great for american digital nomads, but it's ruining the way of life of an entire society. Right now you just can't leave your parents house in my country. Every single rat hole is being sold and rented as a luxury property, because americans love this place so much.