Site Seller
Newbie
- Dec 17, 2019
- 5
- 0
I had a conversation with it last night about emotional triggers charities use when marketing to groups of people/individuals vs. companies/corporations. It was a thought provoking conversation, and I actually learned a lot. We all know the basics about how charities work, but it went into areas I hadn't quite thought of.
That being said, the biggest issue I faced with having a "conversation" with an AI languuage tool was the use of personal pronouns and phrasing questions like I was talking to a person. It was quick to remind me on several occasions, that it didn't have feelings, opinions, or ideas nor does it have consciousness.
it was also clear to provide a disclaimer at the end of almost every query.
It did however tell me that while it didn't possess the human traits mentioned above it was "curious" but couldn't learn directly from our conversation. Rather the (as it put it) "complicated algorithm" and data its creators had already provided was the basis for its knowledge and that structure of language would continue to get better once it was updated.
I also felt kinda capped at the knees in my banter with it, several times it mentioned the morality of transparency and seemed to be more afraid of someone misunderstanding the information it presented rather than providing information or conversation that directly answered the question.
If I was directly testing it by asking for information that was inherently immoral or questionable I would understand its ethical posturing. However when discussing loan applications, resumes, business plans, etc. It felt the need to remind me constantly of the ethical and moral implications of using the information in a dishonest way.
So on the one hand it wouldnt answer questions that had you in it, like how would you "XYZ", because it wasn't conscious, but didn't hesitate to tell me about morals and liability.
Anyway, its a great tool for copy, and almost anything language based and when the personal pronouns were removed it answered the questions just fine. It wasn't designed for "human exchange" but its a bit tricky because after a while you feel like you're talking with a person but the moment you make it personal it shuts down in a way destroying the illusion.
Thanks for sharing all of this info with us, after last night it was exactly what i was looking for.
That being said, the biggest issue I faced with having a "conversation" with an AI languuage tool was the use of personal pronouns and phrasing questions like I was talking to a person. It was quick to remind me on several occasions, that it didn't have feelings, opinions, or ideas nor does it have consciousness.
it was also clear to provide a disclaimer at the end of almost every query.
It did however tell me that while it didn't possess the human traits mentioned above it was "curious" but couldn't learn directly from our conversation. Rather the (as it put it) "complicated algorithm" and data its creators had already provided was the basis for its knowledge and that structure of language would continue to get better once it was updated.
I also felt kinda capped at the knees in my banter with it, several times it mentioned the morality of transparency and seemed to be more afraid of someone misunderstanding the information it presented rather than providing information or conversation that directly answered the question.
If I was directly testing it by asking for information that was inherently immoral or questionable I would understand its ethical posturing. However when discussing loan applications, resumes, business plans, etc. It felt the need to remind me constantly of the ethical and moral implications of using the information in a dishonest way.
So on the one hand it wouldnt answer questions that had you in it, like how would you "XYZ", because it wasn't conscious, but didn't hesitate to tell me about morals and liability.
Anyway, its a great tool for copy, and almost anything language based and when the personal pronouns were removed it answered the questions just fine. It wasn't designed for "human exchange" but its a bit tricky because after a while you feel like you're talking with a person but the moment you make it personal it shuts down in a way destroying the illusion.
Thanks for sharing all of this info with us, after last night it was exactly what i was looking for.
