Nope, they have not stated that.Google hates AI.
They don't like poor quality content and don't like 'scraped' content.
Nope, they have not stated that.Google hates AI.
They are a big fan of AI content, at least when generating by them. They are not fans of indexing AI content produced by others .They are more like a hypocrite then. Though I'm not saying they hate AI. I am saying they're aren't a big fan of 'AI content'
I am quite sure it had nothing to do with AI content but rather with some other patterns that are easy to detect like thousands of pages pushed daily, maybe some common AI generated text footprints.Have you seen the October spam update yet? Most of the sites that got hit are a result of carelessly implemented AI content. So...
Manual HQ written content is key for big bank and passionate writers (bloggers). No AI can beat themGoogle hates AI. With the deep pockets, strong muscles and long arms that Google has, I'm wondering if soon, Google will start a legal battle with the AI content writing industry. Though it logically makes no sense, however with deep pockets, strong muscles and long arms, logic & reality stands no chance.
Automated HQ content is key for big automation and high roller SEOs. No writer can beat them.Manual HQ written content is key for big bank and passionate writers (bloggers). No AI can beat them
Google will soon patent all electricity and allow generation of that only to some people in the world.Google hates AI. With the deep pockets, strong muscles and long arms that Google has, I'm wondering if soon, Google will start a legal battle with the AI content writing industry. Though it logically makes no sense, however with deep pockets, strong muscles and long arms, logic & reality stands no chance.
Whats your instructions?Just made a quick test on some medical blog topics. It is impressive! Much longer content from a single instruct and in higher quality!
This test was run with a simple "create a detailed blogpost about XXX in NNN words. Keyword: YYY".Whats your instructions?
Nnn words means *500-600* the amount you put? Are the results satisfying? Do you need to edit them or just copy pasting the article is EnoughThis test was run with a simple "create a detailed blogpost about XXX in NNN words. Keyword: YYY".
NNN stands for the number of words, ie. 500. Make sure you set the number of max tokens accordingly, using a multiplier of 1.3. 500 words = approx. 650 tokens.Nnn words means *500-600* the amount you put? Are the results satisfying? Do you need to edit them or just copy pasting the article is Enough
Can you share more instructions that can be used?This test was run with a simple "create a detailed blogpost about XXX in NNN words. Keyword: YYY".
There is plenty of examples on openai. Just play with it and your own instructions. The engine is fairly smart to understand instructions.Can you share more instructions that can be used?
Do you think all these ai writing assistants are useless since there is openai? I'm referring to copy ai jasper..etc.There is plenty of examples on openai. Just play with it and your own instructions. The engine is fairly smart to understand instructions.
It depends on your needs. Some people like writing assistants, others (like me) prefer to create content from scripts.Do you think all these ai writing assistants are useless since there is openai? I'm referring to copy ai jasper..etc.
My developer and I already started exploring it right after the launch. It will astonish you, really.
I observed the high level of creativity as well. I also figured that if you just input some nonsensical prompts, Davinci 003 will still make sense of your nonsense and output some badass creative, unique content. See the https://www.blackhatworld.com/seo/isnt-davinci-003-amazing.1457481/.What kind of capabilities have you figured out.
For me, I have found out that I can be creative with my prompts.