It?s an antithesis thing. Nobody wants to think that he didn?t do anything wrong simply because HaRRo thinks he did and everyone would simply follow along, he didn?t do anything wrong. I?m sure many members aren?t pitching in on this subject because they know it is quite ridiculous and it shouldn?t even be this far.
If he actually did anything that broken the rules, yesterday, show me which rules, or if he did broke the rules any other time before yesterday, why did you just ban him yesterday? Oh? yeah, because you?re ?sick? of the ?way? (stated in the other thread) blah blah, HaRRo is just an egocentric bigot and that?s not an insult, I?m just using the appropriate definitions for which I see.
As for the massive support for his banning, I think they?re simply members with no independent thinking, at-least most or has been subjected to the duress idea that Clayton did anything wrong in the first place. He didn?t give HaRRo a review of his product which wasn?t even complete yet when HaRRo was basically breathing down his neck, so what? I wouldn?t either if I searched Google and found what I found about HaRRo.
I?m really not concerned of what he did, which was harmless, like any marketer would, I?m concerned that he was banned, for no reason other than a debatable opinion from HaRRo, that his business sickens him for all we know, what could that mean? I like the smart talk, but let?s not play stupid; I?d like a solid answer to his banning, in the first place. I?d say a direct copy & paste from the rulebook?
It?s funny how many people seem to hate the guy, like they know him, but I think it?s because their precious administrator couldn?t get a review. For all we know, the content could be awesome. It?s ridiculous how everyone is trying to smear on the guy simply because one forum major does, where?s independent thinking? It was a dead horse then, HaRRo said he didn?t need the content, he?d wipe his ass with it, he?s ?semi-retired? and has a ?mansion?, ?Lamborghini?, whatever (indirect quote, just that I have better grammar saying it) ? sounds like a diehard jerk.
You can tell he did nothing wrong, this is HaRRo?s guilty conscience at play, ?I banned him for 7 days?, ?Should Clayton be banned for good? ? such a sneaky pos. this reason you give in this thread why he should be banned, is highly opinion and debatable, not anything I see in the rulebook or do you make up stuff as you go?
I?d like to see the actual rules broken, stop the B.S. All of you, who feel he has broken the rules, show the money. I keep hearing this B.S., but I don?t see it which rules Clayton broken, show me, I must be blind.
P.S. ? I?m sorry if I disrespect or offended someone, but this doesn?t make sense. That?s another bold lie brought to you by Harro, he never made it to the BST, arg, such a blatant liar, and he never made it that far. His threads were closed, he left, recently returned to clear the mess about his product. He never had a BST about incomegreed up, so harro is saying he had some type of credit, had his product sold in the BST, skipped fees, and now didn?t pay? No! This is way ridiculous now, people are simply lying, the admin. Do you guys HONESTLY think they would allow him to sell something in the BST (HE OBVIOUSLY didn?t sell anything, he would HAVE to pay the fees, he didn?t bypass shit, he never made it that far, lies, wow.)
My $0.02, if anybody else is allowed.
- Peace