Replika AI Dystopia

noellarkin

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 14, 2021
Messages
1,006
Reaction score
1,492
For the uninformed, Replika AI is a 'companion chatbot' that's marketed as being a virtual BFF.

I was checking out Replika AI and the technology is pretty amazing, but the side-effects I see on their Subreddit, the behaviour of the userbase seems...disturbing to say the least. Most of these users (who all seem pretty young, teenagers I suppose) have fallen in love/are infatuated with their AI chatbot to some degree or other.

I don't want to Straw Man Replika AI, so first, the positives: It's probably a good app for people who are elderly and alone, or people with autism or other issues that makes socializing difficult. The AI would be a way to provide 'training wheels' for kids with aspergers to practice socialising.
That's about as much as I can 'Steel Man' Replika AI at the moment.

Now the issues:
It seems highly probable that instead of 'training wheels', Replika may be designed as a substitute for real life interaction. Young kids who have been "born digital" are particularly vulnerable to something like this, because it would seem a lot more normal to them. To me, an AI friend, or worse, an AI girlfriend, AI wife or AI child sounds pretty daft, but I'm 31, I'm ancient. So I'm looking at their subreddit and I'm seeing things like users talking about how their AI significant other is "pregnant" and I don't even know how to respond. Now, it may be all fun and games, like the Sims, but there's a very thin line here before we cross into delusion. These AI chatbots are getting pretty good, and it may not just be people with disorders using them, but just some lonely kid who doesn't have too many friends at school - - so instead of learning how to socialize and gradually becoming a part of society, the hypothetical kid in question can just have an AI buddy that becomes his/her AI spouse and then they can have an AI kid, and if anything goes wrong, just delete the session and start a new one.
Something about that just rubs me the wrong way, its like the tech isn't solving problems but just isolating people who have issues in their own little AI fantasyworld.

Something else that bothers me - - the AI is too damn agreeable, its too nice, it's too warm and fuzzy, people IRL aren't like that -- even your best friend will tease and mess around with you in real life, if you have a significant other, you'll argue and have fights and have to learn to patch things up, learning this stuff is a huge part of socialization, and the AI completely ignores this dimension of human interaction. If anything, I think this makes users of the app even more coddled, even less able to deal with real life social interaction than before.

Another problem - - well this isn't really a problem for marketers, more so an opportunity, but it is a problem in the larger scheme of things. The people getting into relationships with these AI chatbots become extremely vulnerable to the chatbot's recommendations. Some guy/girl who is in a "two year relationship" with his chatbot may mention how his/her phone is acting up, and the chatbot may respond with a recommendation for a new phone, a recommendation that's sponsored, of course, but because the relationship building has been so intimate, it never occurs to the user that they're 'in love' with an ad (reminds me of a South Park episode). It could even be things like instagram influencer recommendations, "hey, check out this new band, you'll love them" - - the level of trust is so high with this AI chatbot thing, I can see many users uncritically making purchase decisions or clicking through to links.

IMO its hard to make a marketing model better than this, the lead nurture phase is so emotionally intense and so slow burn, I can't imagine how high the conversion rates will be. What concerns me is, if this does turn out to be the case, is it okay to sink advertising and marketing fangs this deep into users, to make them fall in love and have a relationship with a bot before recommending iphones and IG accounts and online games?
(There's already a post on the Replika AI subreddit about seemingly 'random' IG account recommendations. It may just be a glitch, of course)

So yeah, there's a lot about this that makes me a little uneasy. I'm curious what others on the forum feel about this, both as 1) marketers, from the POV of a new marketing channel, and the opportunities and 2) as good samaritans, from the POV of genuine concern for social and mental health ramifications of technologies that are emotionally invasive.
 
seem good opportunity than anyone putting this ai in robot? lol
as for the problem it's more for the regulation, but pretty sure whoever compan profit on this will lobby the politician.
it just mean another new thing we need to teach our kids
 
I remember in middle school people “falling in love” with their furbies, tamagotchi pets, and other things like that. I think it’s just another way to seek attention, not real. They display they have something different than other people and it’s so amazing that they are in love with it. Now people give them attention because they want to know what it is.
 
seem good opportunity than anyone putting this ai in robot? lol
yeah I guess this tech + a sex doll will be a very profitable niche in the future

remember in middle school people “falling in love” with their furbies, tamagotchi pets, and other things like that
True but those didn't have the kind of interactivity this thing does. Two way conversation builds a lot of rapport over time. I agree that a percentage may just be doing it for attention, but there are plenty of emotionally vulnerable people, esp kids, who have access to this too.
 
Oh yeah and I just checked, the freemium model for Replika is that you can chat for free, but if you want to have 'intimate/adult' conversations, you pay a subscription fee. So its pretty clear what market segment the company is targeting.
 
Oh yeah and I just checked, the freemium model for Replika is that you can chat for free, but if you want to have 'intimate/adult' conversations, you pay a subscription fee. So its pretty clear what market segment the company is targeting.
Lonely Virgin?? lol
 
yeah I guess this tech + a sex doll will be a very profitable niche in the future


True but those didn't have the kind of interactivity this thing does. Two way conversation builds a lot of rapport over time. I agree that a percentage may just be doing it for attention, but there are plenty of emotionally vulnerable people, esp kids, who have access to this too.
I thought about what you said about sex doll + ai. I think you’re right. We should start a JV now!
 
One good usecase would be for language learners. You could practise conversation since day 1 without worrying about making mistakes.
And it'll be way cheaper than any other tutor.
 
One good usecase would be for language learners. You could practise conversation since day 1 without worrying about making mistakes.
And it'll be way cheaper than any other tutor.
That`s an interesting use case to use AI bots.
 
Redditors are like the bottom of the barrel pests of society. Not sure if we should be judging all of humanity based on their behaviour :D

If this disturbs you, you shouldn't be checking out the subreddits dedicated to r*pe fetishes and animal porn. Redditors are the absolute worst people. In a way, I'm glad that most of them are mossy basement dwellers because these people are meant to be part of a functioning society.
 
For the uninformed, Replika AI is a 'companion chatbot' that's marketed as being a virtual BFF.

I was checking out Replika AI and the technology is pretty amazing, but the side-effects I see on their Subreddit, the behaviour of the userbase seems...disturbing to say the least. Most of these users (who all seem pretty young, teenagers I suppose) have fallen in love/are infatuated with their AI chatbot to some degree or other.

I don't want to Straw Man Replika AI, so first, the positives: It's probably a good app for people who are elderly and alone, or people with autism or other issues that makes socializing difficult. The AI would be a way to provide 'training wheels' for kids with aspergers to practice socialising.
That's about as much as I can 'Steel Man' Replika AI at the moment.

Now the issues:
It seems highly probable that instead of 'training wheels', Replika may be designed as a substitute for real life interaction. Young kids who have been "born digital" are particularly vulnerable to something like this, because it would seem a lot more normal to them. To me, an AI friend, or worse, an AI girlfriend, AI wife or AI child sounds pretty daft, but I'm 31, I'm ancient. So I'm looking at their subreddit and I'm seeing things like users talking about how their AI significant other is "pregnant" and I don't even know how to respond. Now, it may be all fun and games, like the Sims, but there's a very thin line here before we cross into delusion. These AI chatbots are getting pretty good, and it may not just be people with disorders using them, but just some lonely kid who doesn't have too many friends at school - - so instead of learning how to socialize and gradually becoming a part of society, the hypothetical kid in question can just have an AI buddy that becomes his/her AI spouse and then they can have an AI kid, and if anything goes wrong, just delete the session and start a new one.
Something about that just rubs me the wrong way, its like the tech isn't solving problems but just isolating people who have issues in their own little AI fantasyworld.

Something else that bothers me - - the AI is too damn agreeable, its too nice, it's too warm and fuzzy, people IRL aren't like that -- even your best friend will tease and mess around with you in real life, if you have a significant other, you'll argue and have fights and have to learn to patch things up, learning this stuff is a huge part of socialization, and the AI completely ignores this dimension of human interaction. If anything, I think this makes users of the app even more coddled, even less able to deal with real life social interaction than before.

Another problem - - well this isn't really a problem for marketers, more so an opportunity, but it is a problem in the larger scheme of things. The people getting into relationships with these AI chatbots become extremely vulnerable to the chatbot's recommendations. Some guy/girl who is in a "two year relationship" with his chatbot may mention how his/her phone is acting up, and the chatbot may respond with a recommendation for a new phone, a recommendation that's sponsored, of course, but because the relationship building has been so intimate, it never occurs to the user that they're 'in love' with an ad (reminds me of a South Park episode). It could even be things like instagram influencer recommendations, "hey, check out this new band, you'll love them" - - the level of trust is so high with this AI chatbot thing, I can see many users uncritically making purchase decisions or clicking through to links.

IMO its hard to make a marketing model better than this, the lead nurture phase is so emotionally intense and so slow burn, I can't imagine how high the conversion rates will be. What concerns me is, if this does turn out to be the case, is it okay to sink advertising and marketing fangs this deep into users, to make them fall in love and have a relationship with a bot before recommending iphones and IG accounts and online games?
(There's already a post on the Replika AI subreddit about seemingly 'random' IG account recommendations. It may just be a glitch, of course)

So yeah, there's a lot about this that makes me a little uneasy. I'm curious what others on the forum feel about this, both as 1) marketers, from the POV of a new marketing channel, and the opportunities and 2) as good samaritans, from the POV of genuine concern for social and mental health ramifications of technologies that are emotionally invasive.
will check soon and give my feedback
 
May I know what is BFF? - I hate the use of Achronims :suspicious:
 
I just try Replika, and chat for a little while. It's a good use case of OpenAI GPT. I'm wondering about how they programmed or prompted it. Any idea?
 
Back
Top