Permanently Closed Marketplace Sales Thread

[DigimetriqOfficial]

You can add ticks / checkboxes "format for wordpress" + "format for html" or similar.

Don't fear to extend your product's interface.

Yes, will do that or simply add <p> tags.
Will work for both, wordpress/ outside wordpress.

 

[123jj]

Do you support other languages? French, German, .etc

 

[DigimetriqOfficial]

Do you support other languages? French, German, .etc

Not yet but multi-language will be coming in as well

 

[OccultKingdoms]

I generated 10 articles yesterday. It took 20 minutes. This could be done quicker, but doesn't affect quality, so just saying.

I sent them to another human and below are the results.

5 were accepted, 4 were reviewed as duplicate (not full articles, some sentences looked paraphrased) / non-factual / not coherent content. 1 was really repetitive and looked like straight from Open-AI.

Yes, the reviewer was really picky.

I didn't edit any of them, except some AI flaws like no spaces between words in one article and no line breaks between some points. Also I had to remove spaces before punctuation marks. This can and should be fixed.

With editing, they do pass, but that's not my goal.

So I wouldn't say "go to autoblogging and make money by selling articles". No way! Unless you are selling to people who don't care about quality.

Humans will be picky about these. Digimetriq said why here: https://www.blackhatworld.com/seo/recommendation-for-1-click-ai-writer-for-answer-post.1422832/#post-15455034

Overall, Digimetriq is honest about their product and you can do a lot with it for:

a) blogging for easy non-technical, no YMYL niches,
b) clients who don't obsess on perfect articles,
c) content for your SEO services where the quality is secondary.

 

[DigimetriqOfficial]

Major Update -
New Module Launched in the App

One-Click Amazon Product Review Writer


Convert any Amazon product to a review in one click!

Use cases -
- Spin up different review sites in matter of hours.
- Generate and schedule content on new/ existing sites.
- Edit and Combine multiple products to create a very lengthy top-10 best products type reviews. (We got an automated one that does that > https://top-notch10.com but that's a story for another day)
- Create a perfect SILO Structured site with top-10/ top-5 products in each category and linking to individual product reviews.

Live in the dashboard. Trial and Paid users can use it right away!

Please share your reviews as well!

 

[DigimetriqOfficial]

 

[idealu]

Hey, got a review copy of 5 articles

Here are the pros:

- very long articles
- grammar seems fine
- decent creation time 5 minutes for 5 articles



Here are the negatives:

- very repetitive keywords
- wrong bullet points: puts a dot and a coma EG: 1.,
- they do seem to be computer generated
- won't use them on a money site


Recommended? for money site definetly no, but I would use them as pbn content or tier1 content for web20, etc

 

[DigimetriqOfficial]

Hi Everyone.

Another major update!
V 2.0 of Article Generation (General keywords to articles)

What we did -
1. Repetitions have been reduced in the outputs. Articles are now more apt. Quality has been improved.
2. Removed option for keywords in single article generations. This leads to better outputs. This mode will be renamed to "Quick Generate" in coming updates.
3. Custom Sub-headings - Keywords is now compulsory to be used under each sub-heading. It's for pro users who would want better outputs. This will be renamed to "Pro Mode" in coming updates.
4. We know waiting for generations take time. Hence, added something to entertain you.

New samples >

https://autoblogging.ai/why-is-my-poodle-sleeping-more-v-2-0/https://autoblogging.ai/how-do-light-rays-travel-v-2-0/https://autoblogging.ai/how-to-make-cheese-cakev2-0/https://autoblogging.ai/how-to-get-rid-of-sprain-v2-0/https://autoblogging.ai/how-to-save-money-on-your-wedding-dress-final-test-v2-0/
Feel free to test it out.
Those who got free trials, can again ask for a code to redeem. You can review again.

Looking forward to more feedback so that we can improve the quality more.

Thanks and cheers!

 

[OccultKingdoms]

So here's my opinion on the subheading module.

I believe this is davinci-002 token + custom machine learning and natural language processing tricks applied by the owner.

I made a tool like this and it was just davinci-002 token. I had to spend 5 minutes to get an article in order. Here it is smooth and saves me a lot of headaches. Worth the price of 30 cents per 1500 word article.

Pros:
- one submission gives you 1500 words on average,
- you can use one submission to generate many short (and unrelated!) articles if you want,
- each heading / paragraph pair uses its own keywords, one keyword per heading is enough,
- repetition is rare with the keyword module, can't find it almost (the unique feature of this product),
- not much bullshit and paragraphs don't start with repetitive fluff,
- does much better job than extracting keywords with OpenAI and then using them in OpenAI prompts (tried it, the output on non-trained model many times looked like markov chains),
- much better than the one click title module (you pay the price for not doing keyword extraction).

So find a good article on the internet, extract keywords using your best technique and use it inside of AutoBlogging. You can also use common sense. The module seems to follow common sense, as for AI it's really good.

Cons:

- it gives you a paragraph you might consider useless and you can't ask to replace it with a normal heading + paragraph pair, it goes like this "Welcome to my blog! Here I'll be sharing my experiences as a student studying abroad in USA, as well as discussing various topics related to software companies and international business. I hope you find my insights useful and entertaining!",
- can't go for 10 custom articles and create a long queue of articles in the subheading module, you can only send 10 articles using titles, but the title module doesn't let you control much.

I will report if I find any issues and possible improvements in the future.

 

[DigimetriqOfficial]

So here's my opinion on the subheading module.

I believe this is davinci-002 token + custom machine learning and natural language processing tricks applied by the owner.

I made a tool like this and it was just davinci-002 token. I had to spend 5 minutes to get an article in order. Here it is smooth and saves me a lot of headaches. Worth the price of 30 cents per 1500 word article.

Pros:
- one submission gives you 1500 words on average,
- you can use one submission to generate many short (and unrelated!) articles if you want,
- each heading / paragraph pair uses its own keywords, one keyword per heading is enough,
- repetition is rare with the keyword module, can't find it almost (the unique feature of this product),
- not much bullshit and paragraphs don't start with repetitive fluff,
- does much better job than extracting keywords with OpenAI and then using them in OpenAI prompts (tried it, the output on non-trained model many times looked like markov chains),
- much better than the one click title module (you pay the price for not doing keyword extraction).

So find a good article on the internet, extract keywords using your best technique and use it inside of AutoBlogging. You can also use common sense. The module seems to follow common sense, as for AI it's really good.

Cons:

- it gives you a paragraph you might consider useless and you can't ask to replace it with a normal heading + paragraph pair, it goes like this "Welcome to my blog! Here I'll be sharing my experiences as a student studying abroad in USA, as well as discussing various topics related to software companies and international business. I hope you find my insights useful and entertaining!",
- can't go for 10 custom articles and create a long queue of articles in the subheading module, you can only send 10 articles using titles, but the title module doesn't let you control much.

I will report if I find any issues and possible improvements in the future.

Thanks for an Amazing review.
Glad you liked the custom-sub headings option.

The pros made me feel happy since all those points were what we targeted to fix in this update.

The cons part, will look into it and think on it

Cheers

 

[DigimetriqOfficial]

Updated Roadmap -

1. Multi-language is coming in 5 days (Spanish, French, German - first 3 languages)
2. Free tools - SEO title generator, NLP keywords extractor from any url and a bunch more. - Coming in 2 weeks.
3. Tone of voice - Coming in a week.

If you guys have more feature requests, please let me know in your review copies/ feedback.

 

[Bervalin]

Can I get a review copy please?

 

[OccultKingdoms]

Try making it less repetitive. Seriously. It's more repetitive than the original gpt-3 api. I don't have time to write now, but you should keep an eye on synonyms.

 

[DigimetriqOfficial]

Try making it less repetitive. Seriously. It's more repetitive than the original gpt-3 api. I don't have time to write now, but you should keep an eye on synonyms.

Hey it's still the gpt3 davinci. And with all feedbacks combined, repetitions have reduced a lot.

 

[melaniegray74]

Sample please?

 

[OccultKingdoms]

Hey it's still the gpt3 davinci. And with all feedbacks combined, repetitions have reduced a lot.

I mean, try to make more templates for the 1 click module. I can see it's some sort of a template and articles look repetitive when you compare them. All of them have that FAQ section, lengthy introduction and I consider it fluff. There is also less synonyms than in the original GPT-3, especially in lists (a single list under one heading). I compared it as well.

 

[suehemmings486]

I will take review copy

 

[jenniferellison410]

Any review copies?

 

[DigimetriqOfficial]

Sample please?

Sent via pm

I will take review copy

Sent via pm

I will take review copy

Sent via pm

I will take review copy

Sent via pm

Any review copies?

Sent via pm

I mean, try to make more templates for the 1 click module. I can see it's some sort of a template and articles look repetitive when you compare them. All of them have that FAQ section, lengthy introduction and I consider it fluff. There is also less synonyms than in the original GPT-3, especially in lists (a single list under one heading). I compared it as well.

More options coming like tone of voice.
That would change how headings are created by the AI.
You can always use custom headings if you want control over the outputs.
In our experience, and what I've been seeing from users is, people who use single/ bulk generation, dont much care about the headings. (Like myself)

One can easily target low competition keywords and rank it easily, Like i did with these sites within a week -

 

[andrewmay805]

Any review copy